You are here:

Situating Authentic Tasks with Digital Video: Scaffolding the Development of Critical Thinking and Reflection in Preservice Teacher Preparation
PROCEEDINGS

, The University of Texas, United States ; , Wake Forest University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-47-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Advances in technologies have generated a new range of possibilities for teaching, learning, and professional development with digital video. Planning and editing meaningful video is a process that engages learners with an extended cognitive challenge and promotes critical thinking and reflection. Extensive hours of classroom videotaping can be summarized, organized, and presented in more succinct and meaningful forms. Growth can be visualized, reviewed and documented for authentic assessment or portfolio development. Resources once considered impossible to develop can now be created using a laptop. Integrating digital tools to facilitate collection and editing of video simplifies the process of creating meaningful instructional materials or selecting representative samples of teaching performance. This paper presents two approaches to integrating digital video tools with preservice teachers to support their development as instructional designers and reflective practitioners.

Citation

Petrosino, A. & Cunningham, A. (2003). Situating Authentic Tasks with Digital Video: Scaffolding the Development of Critical Thinking and Reflection in Preservice Teacher Preparation. In C. Crawford, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2003--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1524-1530). Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 23, 2020 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Beck, R.J., King, A., & Marshall, S. (2002, April). Effects of videocase construction on preservice teachers’ observations of teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Researchers Association, New Orleans, LA.
  2. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
  3. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2-10.
  4. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  5. Cunningham, A.C., & Benedetto, S. (2002). Using digital video tools to promote reflective practice. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, 551-553.
  6. Costa, A.L., & Kallick, B. (2000). Getting into the habit of reflection. Educational Leadership. 57(7), 6062.
  7. Danielson, C. (2001). New trends in teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership 58(5), 12-15.
  8. Finn, L. (2002). Using video to reflect on curriculum. Educational Leadership 59(6), 72-74.
  9. Goldman, S.R., Petrosino, A.J., Sherwood, R.D., Garrison, S., Hickey, D., Bransford, J.D., & Pellegrino, J.W. (1996). Multimedia environments for enhancing science instruction. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  10. Hole, S., & McEntee, G.H. (1999). Reflection is at the heart of practice. Educational Leadership 56(8), 3437.
  11. Krajcik, J.S., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (2002). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  12. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P.C., Max, R.W., Bass, K.M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 313-350.
  13. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P.W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  14. Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999) Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics 99(5), 258-271.
  15. Lucas, C.A. (1999). Developing competent practitioners. Educational Leadership 56(8), 45-48.
  16. Lyons, N. (1999). How portfolios can shape emerging practice. Educational Leadership 56(8), 63-65.
  17. Perry, G., & Talley, S. (2001). Online video case studies and teacher education: A new tool for preservice education. Journal of Computing and Teacher Education 17(4), 26-31.
  18. Phlegar, J.M., & Hurley, N. (2001) Designing job-embedded professional learning: The authentic task approach. Stoneham, MA: Learning Innovations, a Division of WestEd.
  19. Sherin, M.G. (2000). Viewing teaching on videotape. Educational Leadership 57(8), 36-38.
  20. Sparks, D., & Hirsh, S. (1997). A new vision for staff development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
  21. Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1994). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development 10(4), 40-57.
  22. Thompson, C., & Zeuli, J. (1997). The frame and tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In G. Sykes (Ed.), The heart of the matter: Teaching as the learning profession. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  23. Whitehead, D. (1929). The aims of education. New York: MacMillan

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections