You are here:

Measures of student success with textbook transformations: the Affordable Learning Georgia Initiative
ARTICLE

Open Praxis Volume 9, Number 1, ISSN 1369-9997 e-ISSN 1369-9997 Publisher: International Council for Open and Distance Education

Full Text

Abstract

In 2014, the state of Georgia\u2019s budget supported a University System of Georgia (USG) initiative: Affordable Learning Georgia (ALG). The initiative was implemented via Textbook Transformation Grants, which provided grants to USG faculty, libraries and librarians, and institutions to “transform their use of textbooks and other learning materials into using lower cost options\u201d, in other words to use open educational resources (OER) in lieu of a traditional bound textbook. The Round One Textbook Transformation Grants have already shown to be successful in that they saved students approximately $760,000. What is not known, is the collective impact on student learning. This study examines the learning gains or losses pre- and post-transformation in ALG Round One courses where traditional resources were replaced with OER. It estimates differences between pre- and post- textbook transformation across the following outcomes: 1) Drop Fail Withdraw (DFW) rates, 2) rates of completion, 3) numbers of students receiving a final grade of A or B, C and D, 4) numerical final grades as a percent, 5) final exam grades as a percent, and, 6) course-specific assessment grades measured in percent. Twenty-four data sets were analyzed for DFW rate, eight data sets for completion rate, fourteen data sets for grade distribution, three data sets for final exam grades, three data sets for course specific assessment and one data set for final grades. The null hypothesis that there would be no differences between pre- and post-transformation rates in these learning outcomes was supported. Thus, this study demonstrates that the USG\u2019s ALG initiative helped students save money without negatively impacting learning outcomes. In addition, it is the first of its kind to measure some of these learning outcomes (e.g. final exam grade, assessment grade, and distribution of letter grades) at this scale.

Citation

Croteau, E. (2017). Measures of student success with textbook transformations: the Affordable Learning Georgia Initiative. Open Praxis, 9(1), 93-108. International Council for Open and Distance Education. Retrieved December 4, 2023 from .

This record was imported from OpenPraxis on November 9, 2017. [Original Record]

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Affordable Learning Georgia (2015). Textbook Transformation Grants Round One: Spring Semester 2015 Final Report Summary. Retrieved from: http://affordablelearninggeorgia.org/documents/ALG_R1_Final_Report.pdf
  2. Affordable Learning Georgia (2016). Https://affordablelearninggeorgia.org
  3. Allen, G., Guzman-Alvarez, A., Molinaro, M., & Larsen, D. (2015). Assessing the Impact and Efficacy of the Open-Access ChemWiki Textbook Project. Educause Learning Initiative Brief. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2015/1/assessing-the-impact-and-efficacy-of-theopenaccess-chemwiki-textbook-project
  4. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the Curriculum: Open Educational Resources in US Higher Education, 2014. Babson Survey Research Group.
  5. Bowen, W.G., Chingos, M.M., Lack, K.A., & Nygren, T.I. (2014). Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from a Six-Campus Randomized Trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94–111. Https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.22464Brown,M.B.& Forsythe, A.B. (1974). Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 364–367.
  6. Buczynski, J.A. (2007). Faculty begin to replace textbooks with “freely” accessible online resources. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11(4), 169–179.
  7. Charalambous, C.Y. & Hill H.C. (2012). Teacher knowledge, curriculum materials, and quality of instruction: Unpacking a complex relationship. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(4), 443–466.
  8. College Board (2016). Https://collegeboard.org
  9. Florida Virtual Campus. (2012). 2012 Florida Student Textbook Survey. Tallahassee, FL. Retrieved from http://www.openaccesstextbooks.org/%5Cpd F%5C2012_F lor ida_S tuden t_Tex tbook_
  10. Hewlett (2013). Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/programs/ Education-program/open-educational-resources
  11. Lovett, M., Meyer, O., & Thille, C. (2008). The open learning initiative: Measuring the effectiveness of the OLI statistics course in accelerating student learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2008(1), Art-13. Http://doi.org/10.5334/2008-14 National Association of College Stores (NACS) (2016). Https://nacs.org
  12. OpenStax (2016). Https://openstax.org
  13. Open Textbook Library (2016). Http://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/ Paulsen, M.B., & St John, E.P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(2), 189– 236.
  14. Pawlyshyn, N., Braddlee, D., Casper, L., & Miller, H. (2013). Adopting OER: A Case Study of CrossInstitutional Collaboration and Innovation. Educause Review. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/11/adopting-oer-a-case-study-of-cross Institutional-collaboration-and-innovation
  15. Polanin, J.R., Tanner-Smith, E.E. & Hennessy, E.A. (2016). Estimating the difference between published and unpublished effect sizes: A meta-review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 207–236. ., & Planty, M. (2008). Community Colleges: Special Supplement to The Condition
  16. Shapiro, S.S., & Wilk, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52, 591–611.
  17. UNESCO (2002). Forum on the impact of opencourseware for higher education in developing countries: Final report. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/iiep/eng/focus/opensrc/PDF/OER ForumFinalReport.pdf 108 Emily Croteau
  18. Wilcoxon, F., Katti, S.K., & Wilcox, R.A. (1970). Critical values and probability levels for the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Selected tables in mathematical statistics, 1, 171–259.
  19. Wiley, D., Bliss, T.J., & McEwen, M. (2014). Open Educational Resources: a review of the literature. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 781–789). New

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links