You are here:

Exploring principles of successful eGroup mentoring on the interface of higher education and working life
article

, Centria University of Applied Sciences, Finland

Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Volume 27, Number 4, ISSN 1055-8896 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

An eGroup mentoring model developed by three Finnish universities of applied sciences is examined in this article. The model is part of a more extensive eMentoring programme. In the operational model higher university of applied sciences degree students act as eMentors for undergraduate students in cross-disciplinary groups with the aim of enhancing the latter’s transition to working life. The groups primarily work virtually. The reports of ten groups and individual reflections of eMentors and eActors provide a picture of successful eGroup mentoring principles. These principles are establishment of a structured eGroup mentoring process and promotion of dialogue interaction through diverse and participatory mentoring methods, employing enabling digital tools, appropriate for virtual teamwork. Furthermore eGroup mentoring on the interface of education and working life requires a multi-disciplinary implementation so that it supports the 21st century skills needed in working life.

Citation

Leppisaari, I. (2018). Exploring principles of successful eGroup mentoring on the interface of higher education and working life. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 27(4), 481-505. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 21, 2020 from .

© 2018 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bierema, L.L., & Merriam, S.B. (2002). E-Mentoring: Using computed-mediated communication to enhance mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), 211–227.
  2. LeppisaariRumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Dordrecht: Springer.
  3. Boud, D. (2006). Creating a space for reflection. In D. Boud, P. Cressey & P. Docherty (Eds.) Productive reflection art work (pp. 158–169). London and
  4. Butler, A.J., Whiteman, S., & Crow, G.M. (2013). Technology’s role in fostering transformational educator mentoring. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 2(3), 233–248.
  5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education (5th ed.) London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  6. Colky, D.L., & Young, W.H. (2006). Mentoring in the virtual organization: keys to build successful schools and businesses. Mentoring& Tutoring, 14(4), 433–447.
  7. Docherty, P., Boud, D., & Cressey, P. (2006). Lessons and issues for practice and development. In D. Boud, P. Cressey & P. Docherty (Eds.) Productive reflection at work (pp. 193–206). London and New York: Routledge.
  8. Emelo, R. (2011). Group mentoring best practices. Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(4), 221–227.
  9. Garrison, D.R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century. New York: Taylor& Francis.
  10. Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 31–36.
  11. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2000). Mentoring in the New Millenium. Theory into Practice, 39(1), 50–56.
  12. Heikkinen, L.T., Jokinen, H., & Tynjälä, P. (Eds.) (2012). Peer Group Mentoring for Teacher Development. London and New York: Routledge.
  13. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise. Professional and educational perspectives. Earli. Oxford: Elsevier.
  14. Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Devine, J. (2015). Promoting Effective Digital-Age Learning. A European Framework for Digitally-Competent Educational Organisations. European Union. EUR 27599.
  15. Klasen, N., & Clutterbuck, D. (2004). Implementing mentoring schemes. Oxford: Elsevier.
  16. Kupias, P., & Salo, M. (2014). Mentorointi 4.0 (Mentoring 4.0). Helsinki: Talentum.
  17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripherial participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Exploring Principles of Successful eGroup Mentoring mämentorointi ammattikorkeakouluopettajan osaamisen kehittymisen tukena (Virtual group mentoring supporting a teacher’s professional development). Aikuiskasvatus, 28(4), 278–287.
  18. Leppisaari, I., Vainio, L., Kleimola, R., Hartnell-Young, E., & Makino, Y. (2006). Comparing online mentoring cases in educational context in Finland, Australia and Japan. In Proceedings of EMCC European Mentoring and Coaching Council Conference, November 1–3, 2006, Cologne, Germany.
  19. Leppisaari, I., Vainio, L., Herrington, J., & Im, Y. (2011). International e-benchmarking: flexible peer development of authentic learning principles in higher education. Educational Media International, 48(3), 179–191.
  20. Leppisaari, I., & Åkerlund, H. (2016). Designing eMentoring Training through Authentic Learning Principles at the Interface of Higher Education Studies and Working Life. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2016 (pp. 1165–1174). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement
  21. Lewis, D., & Allan, B. (2005). Virtual learning communities. Berkshire: Open University Press.
  22. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T.C. (2014). Educational Design Research. In J.M. Spector et al. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 131–140). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
  23. Mezirov, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  24. Miller, L., Devaney, S., Kelley, G., & Kuehn, A. (2008). E-mentoring in public health nursing practice. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39(9), 394–399.
  25. McLoughlin, C., Brady, J., Lee, M.J.W., & Russell, R. (2007). Peer-to-peer: An e-mentoring approach to developing community, mutual engagement and professional identity for pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Conference Fremantle, Western Australia, 25–29, November 2007.
  26. McManus, S.E., & Russell, J.E.A. (2007). Peer Mentoring Relationships. In B.R. Ragins & K.E. Kram (Eds.) The Handbook of Mentoring at Work (pp. 273–297). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  27. Owen, H.D. (2015). Making the most of mobility: virtual mentoring and education practitioner professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 23(1), 25-56.
  28. Parsloe, E., & Leedham, M. (2009). Coaching and Mentoring. Practical Conversations to improve learning. 2nd edition. London and Philadelphia: KoganPage.
  29. Peters, L.M., & Manz, C.C. (2007). Identifying antecedents of virtual team collaboration. Team Performance Mangement, 13 (3/4), 117–129.
  30. Tucker, B. (2012). The Flipped Classroom: Online instruction at home frees class time for learning. Education Next, 12 (1).
  31. Welsh, S.C. (2004). Mentoring the future. Cochrane: Momentum Learning Inc.
  32. Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J.D. (2009). Digital Habitats stewarding technology for communities. Portland: CPsquare. Exploring Principles of Successful eGroup Mentoring

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.