You are here:

A Learning Analytics Tool for Usability Assessment in Moodle Environments ARTICLE

, ,

Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Volume 13, Number 3, ISSN 1826-6223 e-ISSN 1826-6223 Publisher: Italian e-Learning Association

Abstract

The use of analytics technologies is increasingly successful in the e-learning domain. In this paper, we propose a novel model aiming at evaluating usability of interfaces adopted by Learning Management Systems and Massive Open Online Courses platforms based on the comparison between desktop and mobile versions, using specific native indicators. The indicators obtained from log files typically tracked by the e-learning platforms are defined as comparable scores. Then, to put the model into practice, we implemented it into Moodle LMS as a preliminary case study. This contribution promises to reduce both time and cost for quality assessment of user interfaces in the e-learning domain, while ensuring adaptability to different platforms.

Citation

Fenu, G., Marras, M. & Meles, M. (2017). A Learning Analytics Tool for Usability Assessment in Moodle Environments. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(3),. Italian e-Learning Association. Retrieved September 26, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Conde, M. Á., Hernández-García, Á., Oliveira, A. (2015), Endless horizons: addressing current concerns about learning analytics. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 259262, ACM.
  2. Del Blanco, Á., Serrano, Á., Freire, M., Martínez-Ortiz, I. (2013), E-Learning standards and learning analytics. Can data collection be improved by using standard data models? In: Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1255-1261, IEEE.
  3. Fenu, G., Marras, M., Boratto, L. (2017), A multi-biometric system for continuous student authentication in e-learning platforms. In: Pattern Recognition Letters, Elsevier. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.patrec.2017.03.027Liaw,S.(2008),Investigatingstudents’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. In: Computers& Education, 51, 864-873. Elsevier.
  4. Lukarov, V., Chatti, M.A, Schroeder, U. (2015), Learning Analytics Evaluation: Beyond Usability. In: Proceedings of DeLFI Workshops 2015 co-located with 13th e-Learning Conference of the German Computer Society, 123-131.
  5. Nanduri, S., Babu, N.S.C., Jain, S., Sharma, V., Garg, V., Rajshekar, A.P., Rangi, V. (2012), Quality Analytics Framework for E-learning Application Environment. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), 204-207, IEEE.
  6. Nespereira, C.G, Vilas, A.N., Redondo R.P.D. (2015), Am I failing this course? Risk prediction using e-learning data. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 271276, ACM.
  7. Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011), Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley& Sons. Rohini, Chhabra, I. (2014), Quality Analytics for Evaluation of Dynamic Web Based Learning Environment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), 138-141, IEEE.
  8. Sauro J., Lewis J.R. (2012), Quantifying the User Experience, Morgan Kaufmann
  9. Pub (2012).
  10. Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Specht, M. (2015), Developing an Evaluation Framework of Quality Indicators for Learning Analytics. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK), 16-20, ACM.
  11. Tempelaara, D.T., Rientiesb, B., Giesbersc, B. (2015), In search for the most informative data for feedback generation, Learning analytics in a data-rich context. In: Learning Analytics, Educational Data Mining and Educational Decision Making, 157-167.
  12. Thakkar, S.R, Joshi, H.D. (2015), E-Learning Systems: A Review. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), 37-40. IEEE.
  13. Vasanthapriyan, S., Tian, J., Xiang, J. (2015), A survey on knowledge management in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security-Companion (QRS-C), IEEE.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.