References

1. Akpinar, Y., & Hartley, J.R. (1996). Designing interactive learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 12(1), 33-46.
2. Akpinar, Y., & Simsek, H. (2007). Should K-12 teachers develop learning objects? Evidence from the field with K-12 students. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4(3), 31-44. Retrieved 02 June 2008 from www.itdl.org/Journal/Mar_07/Mar_07.pdf
3. Churchill, D. (2007). Towards a useful classification of learning objects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 479-497.
4. Cochrane, T. (2005). Interactive quicktime: Developing and evaluating multimedia learning objects to enhance both face-to-face and distance e-learning environments. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge Akpinar and Learning Objects, 1, 33–54. Retrieved June 02, 2008, from http://www.ijklo.org/Volume1/v1p033-054Cochrane.pdf
5. Cohen, J. (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
6. Dron, J., Boyle, C., & Mitchell, R. (2002). Evaluating assessment using n dimensional filtering. In Proceedings of the World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Montreal, Canada, October 15-19. Pp. 268-274. Norfolk, VA, AACE Publication.
7. Friesen, N. (2005). Interoperability and learning objects: An overview of e-learning standardization. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1, 23-31. Retrieved June 02, 2008, from http://ijklo.org/Volume1/v1p023-031Friesen.pdf
8. Haughey M., & Muirhead, B. (2005). Evaluating learning objects for schools. The e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology. 8(1), Article3. Retrieved at 15 March 2008 from http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/e-jist/docs/vol8_no1/fullpapers/Haughey_Muirhead.pdf
9. Jonassen, Z.D., & Churchill, D. (2004). Is there a learning orientation in learning objects? International Journal on E-Learning, 3(2), 32-41.
10. Kay, R., & Knaack, L. (2005). Developing learning objects for secondary school students: A multicomponent model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1, 229-254. Retrieved June 02, 2008, from http://www.ijklo.org/Volume1/v1p229-254Kay_Knaack.pdf
11. Kay, R., & Knaack, L. (2007). Evaluating the learning in learning objects. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 22(1), 5–28.
12. Krauss, F., & Ally, M. (2005). A study of the design and evaluation of a learning object and implications for content development. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1, 1-22. Retrieved June 02, 2008, from http://ijklo.org/Volume1/v1p001-022Krauss.pdf
13. Li, J.Z., Nesbit, J.C., & Richards, G. (2006). Evaluating learning objects across boundaries: The semantics of localization. Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 4(1), 17-30.
14. Maceviciute, E., & Wilson T.D. (2008). Evaluation of learning objects from the user's perspective: The case of the EURIDICE Service. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 4, 8395. Retrieved June 02, 2008, from http://www.ijklo.org/Volume4/IJELLOv4p083095Maceviciute501.pdf
15. McCormick, R. & Li, N. (2006). An evaluation of European learning objects in use. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(3), 213-231.
16. Merrill, M.D. (2001). Knowledge objects and mental models. In D.A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects. Retrieved 02 June 2008 from http://www.reusability.org/read/chapters/merrill.doc
17. Nesbit, J.C., & Li, J. (2004). Web-based tools for learning object evaluation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Information Systems: Technologies and Applications, 2, 334-339.
18. Nurmi, S., & Jaakkola, T. (2005). Problems underlying the learning object approach. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(11), 61–66. Retrieved 02 June 2008 from www.itdl.org/Journal/Nov_05
19. Parrish, P.E. (2004). The trouble with learning objects. Educational Technology, Research& Development, 52(1), 49–67.
20. Polsani, P.R. (2003). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital Information, 3(4) Article No. 164, Retrieved June 02, 2008, from http://jodi.tamu.edu/Articles/v03/i04/Polsani/
21. Squires, D., & Preece, J. (1999). Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating for learning, usability and the synergy between them. Interacting with Computers, 11(5), 467–483.
22. Strijker, A. (2004). Reuse of learning objects in context: Human and technical issues. Enschede, PrintPartners Ipskamp.
23. Tao, P.K., & Gunstone R.F. (1999). The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 859-882.
24. Tzikopoulos, A., Manouselis, N., & Vuorikari, R. (2007). An overview of learning object repositories. In P. Northrup (Ed.), Learning objects for instruction: Design and evaluation (pp. 29-55). Hershey, PA:
25. Varlamis, I., & Apostolakis, I. (2006). The present and future of standards for e-learning technologies. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 2, 59-76. Retrieved June 02, 2008, from http://ijklo.org/Volume2/v2p059-076Varlamis.pdf
26. Vuorikari, R., Manouselis, N., & Duval, E. (2006). Using metadata for storing, sharing and reusing evaluations for social recommendations. In Go, D.H. & Foo, S. (Eds.), Social Information retrieval systems: Emerging technologies and applications for searching the web effectively. Pp.165-178. Hershey, PA:
27. Wiley, D.A. (2005). Learning objects in public and higher education. In J.M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. Van Schaack, & D.A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technolog, (pp. 1–10). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.