You are here:

A Usability Study on Low-Cost Virtual Reality Technology for Visualizing Digitized Canadian Cultural Objects: Implications in Education
PROCEEDING

, Algoma University, Canada ; , , University of Colima, Mexico

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Washington, DC ISBN 978-1-939797-29-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

A small cultural object from Algoma University’s archive was digitized using a commercial 3D scanner and was visualized using a low-cost and easy-to-use virtual reality (VR) headset and a free online 3D graphics viewer. We ran a preliminary usability study with university students to see whether our VR setting may positively affect the object’s visualization and analysis and in turn support learning about local Canadian culture. Initial results showed that in general the VR setting and the 3D model were effective, efficient and satisfactory to use, motivating students to keep using it in further courses. It will be interesting to see in future studies whether the technology integration in the classroom, technology acceptance, learning with VR technology, likeness, motivation, and other issues change over time in an educational setting.

Citation

Garcia-Ruiz, M.A., Santana-Mancilla, P.C. & Gaytan-Lugo, L.S. (2017). A Usability Study on Low-Cost Virtual Reality Technology for Visualizing Digitized Canadian Cultural Objects: Implications in Education. In J. Johnston (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2017 (pp. 259-264). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 17, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Algoma University Archive (2017). Bunny. Available: http://archives.algomau.ca/main/node/25490 Brooke, J. (2013). SUS-a retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies. Available: http://www.uxpajournal.org/sus-aretrospective/
  2. Bustillo A., Alaguero M., Miguel I., Saiz J.M. & Iglesias L.S. (2015). A flexible platform for the creation of 3D semi-immersive environments to teach Cultural Heritage. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 2(4), Pp 248-259.
  3. Castaneda, L., & Pacampara, M. (2016, March). Virtual reality in the classroom-An exploration of hardware, management, content and pedagogy. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference, Pp. 527-534.
  4. Fabola, A., Miller, A., & Fawcett, R. (2015, September). Exploring the past with Google Cardboard. In Proceedings of Digital Heritage, Granada, Spain (Vol. 1, pp. 277-284). IEEE.
  5. Jones, G., & Christal, M. (2002). The future of virtual museums: On-line, immersive, 3d environments. Created realities group, 4. Available: http://W.created-realities.com/pdf/Virtual_Museums.pdf
  6. Le, Q.T., Pedro, A., & Park, C.S. (2015). A social virtual reality based construction safety education system for experiential learning. Journal of Intelligent& Robotic Systems, 79(3-4), 487.
  7. Llorens Rodriguez, R. & Alcaniz Raya, ML. (2015). Effectiveness, usability, and cost-benefit of a virtual realitybased telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 96(3):418-425.
  8. MacFarlane, S., Sim, G, & Horton, M. (2005). Assessing usability and fun in educational software. In Proceedings of the Conference on interaction Design and Children IDC '05, Boulder, CO Matter& Form (2017). Matter and Form 3D scanner. Available: https://matterandform.net/scanner Nielsen, J. (2000). Why you only need to test with 5 users. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-youonly-need-to-test-with-5-users/
  9. Norman, D. (1999). The invisible computer. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  10. Ott, M., & Freina, L. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art and perspectives. In Conference proceedings of» eLearning and Software for Education «(eLSE) (No. 01, pp. 133-141).
  11. Santos, P., Pena Serna, S., Stork, A. & Fellner, D (2014). The Potential of 3D Internet in the Cultural Heritage Domain. In A Roadmap in Digital Heritage Preservation on 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage-Volume 8355, Marinos Ioannides and Ewald Quak (Eds.), Vol. 8355. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
  12. Sauro, J. (2011). A Practical Guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, Benchmarks& Best Practices. Denver, CO: CreateSpace.
  13. Virvou, M., & Katsionis, G. (2008). On the usability and likeability of virtual reality games for education: The case of VR-ENGAGE. Computers& Education, 50(1), 154-178.
  14. Zaharias, P.A. (2004). Usability and e-learning: the road towards integration. ELearn Magazine, Volume 2004, Issue 6.
  15. Zaharias, P.A. (2006). Usability evaluation method for e-learning: Focus on motivation and learning. In Proceedings of CHI 2006, Montreal, Canada, ACM. Acknowledgements The first author acknowledges support from Algoma University Research Fund.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides