Distance Learning: Universal Design, Universal Access
Sheryl Burgstahler, University of Washington, United States
AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal) Volume 10, Number 1, ISSN 1065-6901 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Distance learning courses offer opportunities for education and career enhancement for those who have access to the technologies they employ. However, many people find themselves on the wrong side of the digital divide that separates those with access to new technologies and those without. Even if they have access to these technologies, some people with disabilities find themselves on the wrong side of a second digital divide that is caused by the inaccessible design of coursework. This paper discusses access, legal and policy issues, and it presents an overview of design considerations for assuring that a distance learning course is accessible to potential instructors and students with a wide range of abilities and disabilities. The field of universal design provides a framework for this discussion. The content of this article can be used to help distance learning programs develop policies, guidelines and procedures for making their courses accessible to everyone.
Burgstahler, S. (2002). Distance Learning: Universal Design, Universal Access. AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal), 10(1), 32-61. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 25, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/17776/.
© 2002 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
- Anders, R., & Fechtner, D. (1992), Universal Design. Brooklyn, NY: Pratt Institute
- Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (2000). Electronic
- Burgstahler, S.E. (2000). Access to Internet-based instruction for people with disabilities. In Petrides, L.A. (Ed.), Case Studies on Information Technology in Higher Education (pp. 76-88). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
- Burgstahler, S. (1997). Teaching on the net: What’s the difference? T.H.E. (Technology and Higher Education) Journal, 24 (9), 61-64.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Case Study Examination: Evaluation of Distance Education Course in Terms of Universal Design Principles
Suleyman Ari, Anadolu University eskisehir Turkey, Turkey
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2014 (Jun 23, 2014) pp. 592–601
Are Your Online Assessments Getting at Learning or Something Else?
Gayle V. Davidson-Shivers & Rebecca M. Reese, University of South Alabama, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2012 (Jun 26, 2012) pp. 2611–2616
Using Virtual Environments to Model Inclusive Design in Distance Education
Thomas Conway, Megan Conway, Steven Brown & Hana Omar, Center on Disability Studies, University of Hawaii, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2011 (Oct 18, 2011) pp. 2216–2223
Evaluating Web Accessibility and Usability at Thailand Cyber University for Totally Blind Users
Salinee Kuakiatwong, Boston University, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010 (Oct 18, 2010) pp. 1904–1907
A Research Agenda for Transforming Pedagogy and Enhancing Inclusive Learning through Synchronised Multimedia Captioned Using Speech Recognition
Mike Wald, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2007 (Jun 25, 2007) pp. 4479–4485
THE REALIZATION OF ACCESSIBLITY: Guidelines for the Creation and Refinement of Universal Online Learning Applications
Bobby Hoffman, Kendall Hartley & Randall Boone, UNLV, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2003 (2003) pp. 3206–3213
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.