You are here:

Evaluating Instruction for Culturally Responsive Teaching Using a STEM Curriculum Review Rubric
PROCEEDING

, , , Texas State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, TX, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-27-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The purpose of this roundtable session is to introduce the Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) section of the STEM Curriculum Review Rubric developed by colleagues in the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research. The STEM Curriculum Review Rubric was developed in response to needing an evaluation guide, written by experts in the field, to evaluate NASA instructional lessons for alignment to NGSS Standards, best practices in Science and Engineering Teaching, alignment to Common Core state standards in Mathematics, best practices in Mathematics Teaching, and Culturally Responsive Teaching. Five basic categories of CRT principles and criteria will be emphasized as participants evaluate a lesson plan for CRT. Simultaneously, the vast array of NASA STEM EPDC resources available to educators at all levels will be shared.

Citation

Delaney, C.J., Lee, K.S. & Bos, B. (2017). Evaluating Instruction for Culturally Responsive Teaching Using a STEM Curriculum Review Rubric. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 394-397). Austin, TX, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 15, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Aspray, W. (2016). Organizations that help women to build STEM careers. In Women and Underrepresented Minorities in Computing (pp. 115-142). Springer International Publishing.
  2. Brown, C.S., Alabi, B.O., Huynh, V.W., & Masten, C.L. (2011). Ethnicity and gender in late childhood and early adolescence: Group identity and awareness of bias. Developmental Psychology, 47, 463-471.
  3. Colwell, R. (2003). Hearing testimony before the Committee on Science Basic Research Subcommittee. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/about/congress/108/rrc_minordigiwiretech070903.jsp DelliCarpini, M., & Alonso, O.B. (2014). Teacher education that works: Preparing secondary-level math and science teachers for success with English Language Learners through content-based instruction. Global Education Review, 1(4), 155-178.
  4. Dong, Y.R. (2002). Integrating language and content: How three biology teachers work with non-English speaking students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 5(1), 40-57.
  5. Ladson-Billings (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. 2nd edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  6. Ladson-Billings, G. (2011). Is meeting the diverse needs of all students possible? Kappa Delta Pi Record, (Fall), 1315.
  7. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2002). Schools and staffing survey, 1999–2000: Overview of the data for public, private, public charter, and Bureau of Indian Affairs elementary and secondary schools. Washington D.C.: NCES. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2002313
  8. National Science Foundation (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011. Special Report NSF 11-309. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/ National Science Foundation. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (NSF 13-304). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/start.cfm
  9. Ortiz, A.M. (2014). NASA STEM EPDC key points. LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research, Texas State University.
  10. Ortiz, A.M. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics [PowerPoint slides]. LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research, Texas State University.
  11. Rodriguez Amaya, L., Martinez Ortiz, A., Vomvoridi-Ivanovic, E., Sorto, M.A, Close, E., Dickinson, G., Bos, B., & Bowman, A. (2015). STEM Curriculum Review Rubric. LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research, Texas State University.
  12. Pentyala, S., Dilger, J., & Rebecchi, M. (2016). Minority students and STEM careers: Will mentoring help? Journal of Health Education Research& Development.
  13. Samson, J.F., & Collins, B.A. (2012). Preparing all teachers to meet the needs of English Language Learners: Applying research to policy and practice for teacher effectiveness. Center for American Progress.
  14. Sowers, J.A., Powers, L., Schmidt, J., Keller, T.E., Turner, A., Salazar, A., & Swank, P.R. (2016). A randomized trial of a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics mentoring program. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 2165143416633426.
  15. Spencer, J. (2005). Final school funding price tag still blank. Houston Chronicle, pp. A1, A4.
  16. Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., & O'Neill, T. (2013). Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: How middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1143-1179.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.