You are here:

Exploring Ownership in Collaborative Knowledge Building: Three Case Examples
PROCEEDING

, University of Helsinki, Educational Technology Services, Finland

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Washington, DC, United States Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper explores the aspect of ownership in collaborative knowledge building. The three case examples from Higher Education examine ownership as access, as adaptation and as control. In all three ownership is seen as a valid concern especially in technologically complex settings. Therefore the very concept of technology should include the resources required for the use of the technical means in question. This way we could better grasp what makes a particular educational technology – whether it is a software package or a theory of learning- useful in a certain context and subsequently design and carry out more refined collaborative knowledge building and other learning activities.

Citation

Kivelä, M. (2016). Exploring Ownership in Collaborative Knowledge Building: Three Case Examples. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 415-420). Washington, DC, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 27, 2022 from .

© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Barry, A. (2001). Political machines: governing a technological society. London; New York: Athlone Press.
  2. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. London; New York: Continuum.
  3. Fox, A. (1995). Fazang. In MacGreal, I.P. (Ed.). Great thinkers of the Eastern world: the major great thinkers and the philosophical and religious classics of China, India, Japan, Korea, and the world of Islam (1. Ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.99-103.
  4. Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of ComputerSupported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 213–231. Http://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9064-x
  5. Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258 –273.
  6. Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science. 21(7),

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References