You are here:

Revising the Community of Inquiry Framework for the Analysis of One-To-One Online Learning Relationships
ARTICLE

, , , KTH Royal Institute of Technology

IRRODL Volume 17, Number 3, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Abstract

In online learning research, the theoretical community of inquiry framework has been used extensively to analyze processes of inquiry among learners and instructors within a community. This paper examines a special case of community of inquiry consisting of only one learner and one instructor. Together they en­gage in an online coaching discourse to form a relationship of inquiry. Within these relationships, coachees pass through processes of practical inquiry process while a coach supports the process. In this study, a framework and coding scheme were developed for use in a transcript coding procedure including 3,109 messages from an online coaching case in math for K–12 students. It is found that the elements of cognitive, teaching, and social presence, as well as the newly proposed emotional presence, which outlines a community of inquiry, comprise an effective structure for the analysis of one-to-one online coaching environments. The findings of this exploratory study suggest that a relationship of inquiry framework has the potential to support development of one-to-one online learning.

Citation

Stenbom, S., Jansson, M. & Hulkko, A. (2016). Revising the Community of Inquiry Framework for the Analysis of One-To-One Online Learning Relationships. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved March 18, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Akyol, Z., Arbaugh, J.B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, D.R., Ice, P., Richardson, J.C., & Swan, K.(2009). A response to the review of the community of inquiry framework. International Journal of E-Learning& Distance Education, 23(2), 123–136. Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/630
  2. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D.R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.iheduc.2011.01.005
  3. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 5(2), 1–17.
  4. Arbaugh, J.B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S.R., Garrison, D.R., Ice, P., Richardson, J.C., & Swan, K.P.(2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 133–136. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.iheduc.2008.06.003
  5. Bloom, B.S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 4–16. Retrieved from
  6. Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 269–292. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1234
  7. Cleveland-Innes, M., Stenbom, S., & Hrastinski, S. (2014). The influence of emotion on cognitive presence
  8. Dirkx, J.M. (2008). The meaning and role of emotions in adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2008(120), 7–18. Retrieved from
  9. Fahy, P.J., Crawford, G., & Ally, M. (2001). Patterns of interaction in a computer conference transcript. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/36/73
  10. Garrison, D.R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York: Taylor& Francis. Retrieved from
  11. Garrison, D.R. (2013). Theoretical foundations and epistemological insights. In Z. Akyol& D.R. Garrison
  12. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of distance education, 15(1), 7–23.
  13. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from
  14. Neuendorf, K. (2002). Defining content analysis, In Neuendorf, K (Ed.), Content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  15. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315– 341. Retrieved from
  16. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R.P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated
  17. Schutz, P.A., & Lanehart, S.L. (2002). Introduction: Emotions in education. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 67–68. Retrieved from
  18. Sutton, R.E., & Wheatley, K.F. (2003). Teachers' emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327–358. Retrieved from
  19. Swan, K., & Ice, P. (2010). The community of inquiry framework ten years later: Introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 1–4. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org.focus.lib.kth.se/
  20. Swan, K., Richardson, J.C., Ice, P., Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J.B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-mentor, 2(24), 1– 12. Retrieved from http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/24/id/543

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.