Article #2011
ARTICLE
P Raju
Journal of STEM Education Volume 17, Number 3, ISSN 1557-5284 Publisher: Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE)
Abstract
Pages 55-63
Citation
Raju, P. (2016). Article #2011. Journal of STEM Education, 17(3),. Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE). Retrieved July 6, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/173637/.
© 2016 Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Andrews, T.M., Leonard, M.J., Colgrove, C.A., & Kalinowski, S.T. (2011). Active Learning Not Associated with Student Learning in a Random Sample of College Biology Courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 394-405.
- Brownell, S.E., & Tanner, K.D. (2012). Barriers to Faculty Pedagogical Change: Lack of Training, Time, Incentives, and… Tensions with Professional Identity? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 339-346.
- D’Avanzo, C. (2013). Post–Vision and Change: Do We Know How to Change? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 373-382.
- Ebert-May, D., Derting, T.L., Hodder, J., Momsen, J.L., Long, T.M., & Jardeleza, S.E. (2011). What We Say Is Not What We Do: Effective Evaluation of Faculty Professional Development Programs. BioScience, 61(7), 550-558.
- Eddy, S.L., & Hogan, K.A. (2014). Getting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453-468.
- Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M.P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.
- Freeman, S., Haak, D., & Wenderoth, M.P. (2011). Increased Course Structure Improves Performance in Introductory Biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 175-186.
- Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific Teaching: Macmillan.
- Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952-984.
- Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012). Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovationdecision process? Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020104.
- Henderson, C., & Dancy, M.H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102.
- Henderson, C., & Dancy, M.H. (2008). Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Physics, 76(1), 79-91. Doi: doi: Kober, N., & Council, N.R. (2015). Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Konietschke, F., Placzek, M., Schaarschmidt, F., & Hothorn, L.A. (2014). Nparcomp: An R Software Package for Nonparametric Multiple Comparisons and Simultaneous Confidence Intervals. Journal of Statistical Software, 61(10), 1-17.
- Macdonald, R.H., Manduca, C.A., Mogk, D.W., & Tewksbury, B.J. (2005). Teaching methods in undergraduate geoscience courses: Results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge survey of US faculty. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(3), 237.
- Machemer, P.L., & Crawford, P. (2007). Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 9-30.
- Michael, J. (2007). Faculty Perceptions About Barriers to Active Learning. College Teaching, 55(2), 42-47.
- Miller, C.J., & Metz, M.J. (2014). A comparison of professionallevel faculty and student perceptions of active learning: its current use, effectiveness, and barriers. [Journal Article]. Advances in Physiology Education, 38(3), 246-252.
- NACE. (2014). Jobs Outlook 2014: National Association of Colleges and Employers.
- Silverthorn, D.U., Thorn, P.M., & Svinicki, M.D. (2006). It’s difficult to change the way we teach: lessons from the Integrative Themes in Physiology curriculum module project. [Journal Article]. Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 204-214.
- Smith, C.V., & Cardaciotto, L. (2012). Is active learning like broccoli? Student perceptions of active learning in large lecture classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 53-61.
- Smith, M.K., Vinson, E.L., Smith, J.A., Lewin, J.D., & Stetzer, M.R. (2014). A Campus-Wide Study of STEM Courses: New Perspectives on Teaching Practices and Perceptions. CBELife Sciences Education, 13(4), 624-635.
- Team, R.D.C. (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.0.1). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
- Wood, W.B. (2009). Innovations in Teaching Undergraduate Biology and Why We Need Them. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 25(1), 93-112. Doi: . Patrick is a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Biological Sciences at Louisiana State University. She has active research projects in mammalian ecology, biogeography, assessment of course-based undergraduate research, and graduate teaching assistant professional development. Dr. Patrick is a 2013-2014 National Academies Education Fellow in the Life Sciences and a 2015-2016 National Academies Education Mentor in the Life Sciences.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Correlates of children’s travel to school in Johannesburg-Soweto—Evidence from the Birth to Twenty Plus (Bt20+) study, South Africa
Julia de Kadt, Gauteng City-Region Observatory, South Africa; Alastair van Heerden, Human and Social Development Programme, South Africa; Linda Richter, MRC/WITS Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, South Africa; Seraphim Alvanides, Geography and Built Environment, United Kingdom
International Journal of Educational Development Vol. 68, No. 1 (July 2019) pp. 56–67
-
Blended Learning Adoption in an ESL Context: Obstacles and Guidelines
William J. Shebansky
TESL Canada Journal Vol. 35, No. 1 (2018) pp. 52–77
-
How Learners Participate in Connectivist Learning: An Analysis of the Interaction Traces From a cMOOC
Zhijun Wang, Jiangnan University; Terry Anderson & Li Chen
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 19, No. 1 (Feb 23, 2018)
-
Investigating Students’ Perceptions of Motivating Factors of Online Class Discussions
Joohi Lee & Leisa Martin, University of Texas at Arlington
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 18, No. 5 (Aug 15, 2017)
-
Networked interactive whiteboards: Rationale, affordances and new pedagogies for regional Australian higher education
Phillip Dawson & Phillip Dawson
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 26, No. 4 (Jan 01, 2010)
-
The Fallacies of Open: Participatory Design, Infrastructuring, and The Pursuit of Radical Possibility
Stephanie West-Puckett, University of Rhode Island, United States; Anna Smith, Illinois State University, United States; Christina Cantrill, National Writing Project, United States; Mia Zamora, Kean University, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 18, No. 2 (June 2018) pp. 203–232
-
Online Hunting, Gathering and Sharing – A Return to Experiential Learning in a Digital Age
Maristela Petrovic-Dzerdz, Carleton University (Athabasca University PBDID (finished) MEd (in process)); Anne Trpanier, Carleton University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 19, No. 2 (May 01, 2018)
-
Challenges of Implementing Free and Open Source Software (FOSS): Evidence from the Indian Educational Setting
Briju Thankachan & David Moore, Ohio University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 18, No. 6 (Sep 25, 2017)
-
Examining Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Technology Self-Efficacy: Impact of Mobile Technology-Based Physics Curriculum
Deepika Menon, Towson University, United States; Meera Chandrasekhar, Dorina Kosztin & Douglas Steinhoff, University of Missouri-Columbia, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 17, No. 3 (September 2017) pp. 336–359
-
Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education
Catherine Cronin, National University of Ireland, Galway
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 18, No. 5 (Aug 15, 2017)
-
Usage Data as Indicators of STEM OER Utility
Marcia Mardis & Chandrahasa Ambavapuru, Florida State University, United States
Journal of Online Learning Research Vol. 3, No. 2 (August 2017) pp. 197–221
-
Playing and Learning: An iPad Game Development & Implementation Case Study | Jouer et apprendre : une étude de cas du développement et de la mise en œuvre d’un jeu sur iPad
Jennifer Jenson, Suzanne de Castell, Rachel Muehrer & Erin McLaughlin-Jenkins
Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie Vol. 42, No. 3 (Aug 08, 2016)
-
Data Driven Decision Making: Integrating Authentic Technologies in Teacher Preparation
Jason Trumble, Donna Wake & Michael Mills, University of Central Arkansas College of Education, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 1199–1205
-
In Search for the Open Educator: Proposal of a Definition and a Framework to Increase Openness Adoption Among University Educators
Fabio Nascimbeni & Daniel Burgos, Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (UNIR)
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 6 (Dec 06, 2016)
-
Anatomy of an Established Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) about Statistics
Lloyd Rieber, The University of Georgia, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2016 (Nov 14, 2016) pp. 1245–1252
-
MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012
Tharindu Liyanagunawardena, University of Reading; Andrew Adams, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan; Shirley Williams, University of Reading
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 14, No. 3 (Jun 03, 2013) pp. 202–227
-
Imagining the future of assessment: for evidence, for credit and for payment
Beverley Oliver & Kay Souter, Deakin University
ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2013 (2013) pp. 657–660
-
Massive online obsessive compulsion: What are they saying out there about the latest phenomenon in higher education?
Vera Dolan, OISE - University of Toronto DePaul University Athabasca University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 15, No. 2 (Apr 01, 2014)
-
Seamless Support: Technology Enhanced Learning in Open Distance Learning at NWU
Hennie Esterhuizen
Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 14, No. 3 (July 2015) pp. 120–137
-
Utilizing Geo-Referenced Mobile Game Technology for Universally Accessible Virtual Geology Field Trips
Natalie Bursztyn, Joel Pederson, Brett Shelton, Andrew Walker & Todd Campbell
International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology Vol. 3, No. 2 (April 2015) pp. 93–100
-
Much aMOOC about Nothing: Is Real Research Coming?
Vicki Williams & Nai-Fen Su, The Pennsylvania State University, United States
International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 14, No. 3 (July 2015) pp. 373–383
-
Developing MOOCs to Narrow the College Readiness Gap: Challenges and Recommendations for a Writing Course
Shoba Bandi-Rao, Borough of Manhattan Community College, CUNY, United States; Christopher Devers, Indiana Wesleyan University, United States
International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 14, No. 3 (July 2015) pp. 351–371
-
The disruptive potential of the Massive Open Online Course: A literature review
Jean Jacoby
Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning Vol. 18, No. 1 (Aug 14, 2014) pp. 73–85
-
Benchmarking the habits and behaviours of successful students: A case study of academic-business collaboration
Elizabeth Archer, Yuraisha Chetty & Paul Prinsloo, University of South Africa
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 15, No. 1 (Jan 15, 2014)
-
Perceptions of ICT: An Exploration of Gender Differences
Lesley Gardner, Don Sheridan & Xinzhuo Ella Tian, The University of Auckland Business School, New Zealand
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2014 (Jun 23, 2014) pp. 120–129
-
Opening teaching landscapes: The importance of quality assurance in the delivery of open educational resources
Javiera Atenas, University College London; Leo Havemann, IT Services Birkbeck, University of London; Ernesto Priego, School of Informatics City University London
Open Praxis Vol. 6, No. 1 (Feb 13, 2014) pp. 29–43
-
MOOCs: Why Low-Cost Will Not Create Equal Access
Nathan Garrett & Yesica Allala, Woodbury University, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013 (Oct 21, 2013) pp. 86–94
-
Using Social Media Technologies to Enhance Online Learning
Linda Weiser Friedman & Hershey Friedman, CUNY, United States
Journal of Educators Online Vol. 10, No. 1 () pp. 1–22
-
Benefiting from MOOC
Youdan Zhang, British Columbia Institute of Technology, Canada
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2013 (Jun 24, 2013) pp. 1372–1377
-
Students benefit from e-Journaling or using Web Journals in an Online Grief, Loss & Bereavement Course
Kirsti Dyer, Madonna University, United States
TCC 2009 (2009) pp. 28–39
-
Intellectual property rights and the myth of the open scholar: an exploratory study of Portuguese academics’ reluctance to make educational materials available online
Jorge Tiago Martins & Miguel Baptista Nunes, Information School, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2012 (Jun 26, 2012) pp. 208–215
-
Benefits and Potentials of Semantic Web in Teacher Education Programs
Betul Czerkawski, The University of Arizona South, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 3581–3583
-
Technology as a Context for Seconday Pre-teachers' Use of Algebraic Inequalities in a Capstone Course
Sergei Abramovich, State University of New York at Potsdam, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (Mar 07, 2011) pp. 3945–3952
-
Technological/Pedagogical Solutions for 21st Century Participatory Knowledge Creation
Cheryl Ward, Wendy Lampner & John Savery, University of Akron, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (Mar 02, 2009) pp. 4169–4174
-
Facing Your Selves: The Effects of Digital Storytelling on Teacher Education
Antonio Tendero, Grand Valley State University, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 6, No. 2 (June 2006) pp. 174–194
-
Literacy Practices and Digital Literacies: A Commentary on Swenson, Rozema, Young, McGrail, and Whitin
Jamie Myers, Pennsylvania State University, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 6, No. 1 (March 2006) pp. 61–66
-
Extended Time and Progressive Vision for the Development of Technology-Using Teachers
Melissa Pierson, University of Houston, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 4, No. 1 (2004) pp. 81–88
-
Commentary: The Growing Utilization of Design-Based Research
Chris Dede, Harvard Graduate School of Education, United States
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 5, No. 3 (2005) pp. 345–348
-
Rage Towards the Machine: Technology and Standards in 2001
Lawrence Baines & Lynnwood Belvin, Berry College, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2001 (2001) pp. 2660–2665
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.