You are here:

If You Build It, Will They Come? Predictors of Teachers’ Participation in and Satisfaction with the Effective Classroom Interactions Online Courses
ARTICLE

, , , , University of Virginia

IRRODL Volume 17, Number 1, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

The Effective Classroom Interactions (ECI) online courses were designed to provide an engaging, effective and scalable approach to enhancing early childhood teachers’ use of classroom practices that impact children’s school readiness. The created courses included several versions aimed at testing whether or not certain design aspects could increase participation and subsequent learning outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which early childhood teachers accessed the courses and varied in their a) participation in the core course content and b) optional discussion board as a result of the course experience they were assigned to as well as individual characteristics that may be associated with participation. Findings indicated that early childhood teachers accessed the course often on nights and weekends and reported high levels of satisfaction with their experience. Both persistence in the ECI courses and overall completion of activities were higher than those reported in other studies of online learning. Whether or not the participant was in the course that had regular interactions with the instructor, comfort with technology and took the course for credit consistently predicted participation, but not always in expected ways. Implications for exploring online learning as a feasible option for early childhood educators are discussed.

Citation

LoCasale-Crouch, J., Hamre, B., Roberts, A. & Neesen, K. (2016). If You Build It, Will They Come? Predictors of Teachers’ Participation in and Satisfaction with the Effective Classroom Interactions Online Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved March 27, 2023 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Angus, S., & Watson, J. (2009). Does regular online testing enhance student learning in the numerical sciences? Robust evidence from a large data set. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 255-272.
  2. Arbaugh, J.B. (2002). Managing the on-line classroom: a study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web-based MBA courses. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13(2), 203–223. Doi:10.1016/S1047-8310(02)00049-4
  3. Arbaugh, J.B., & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses – An exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs. Management Learning, 33(3), 331–347. the Study of Higher Education. (2006). Cost-efficiencies in online learning. ASHE Higher Education Report. 32 (1), 1-123. Doi: 10.1002/aehe.3201
  4. Carey, R., Kleiman, G., Russell, M., Douglas, J., & Louise. J. (2008). On-line courses for math teachers: Comparing self-paced and facilitated cohort approaches. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 7(3), 1-35.
  5. Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The
  6. Chronicle of Higher Education (2000, February 11), pp. A39–A41.
  7. Christensen, R.W., & Knezek, G.A. (2009). Construct validity for the teachers’ attitudes toward computers questionnaire. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(4), 143-155.
  8. Chyung, Y., Winiecki, D.J. & Fenner, J.A. (1998). A case study: Increase enrollment by reducing dropout rates in adult distance education. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning, Madison, WI: Publisher.
  9. Clay, M.N., Rowland, S., & Packard, A. (2009). Improving undergraduate online retention through gated advisement and redundant communication. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 10(1), 93–102.
  10. DeTure, M. (2004). Cognitive style and self-efficacy: Predicting student success in online distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 21–38. Doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1801_3
  11. Dupin-Bryant, P.A. (2004). Pre-entry variables related to retention in online distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 199–206. Doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1804_2
  12. Donohue, C., Fox, S., & Terrance, D. (2007). Early childhood educators as elearners: Engaging approaches to teaching and learning online. Young Children, 1(6), 34-40.
  13. Durlak J.A., & DuPre, E.P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3-4), 327-350.
  14. Early, D., & Winton, P. (2001). Preparing the workforce: Early childhood teacher preparation at 2-and 4-year institutions of higher education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16(3), 285-306. Doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(01)00106-5
  15. Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2), 7–41.
  16. Gardner, D.G., Discenza, R., & Dukes, R.L. (1993). The Measurement of Computer Attitudes: An empirical comparison of available scales. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9(4), 487–507.
  17. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. Doi:
  18. Garrison, D.R. & Arbaugh, J.B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: If You Build It, Will They Come? Predictors of Teachers’ Participation in and Satisfaction with the Effective Classroom Interactions Online Courses LoCasale-Crouch, Hamre, Roberts, Neesen Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157172. Doi:
  19. Gill, W.E. (2011). The Ready to Teach Program: A federal initiative in support of online courses for teachers. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED530966
  20. Habley, W.R., & McClanahan, R. (2004). What works in student retention: All survey colleges. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing (ACT).
  21. Hamre, B., LoCasale-Crouch, J., & Neesen, K. (2014). Can online coursework for early childhood teachers change their teaching practice? Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
  22. Hong, K.S. (2002). Relationships between students’ and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course. Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 267–281. Doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00105-7ImprovingHead Start for School Readiness Act of 2007, H.R. 1429, 110th Cong. (2007). Retrieved from GovTrack.us [database] http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd? Bill=h110-1429
  23. Jaggars, S.S., & Xu, D. (2010). Online learning in the Virginia community college system. New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
  24. Keller, J.M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
  25. Keller, J.M., & Kopp, T.W. (1987). Application of the ARCS model to motivational design. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories, 289-320. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  26. Knowles, M. (1996). Adult Learning. In R.L.Craig (Ed.), The ASTD Training and If You Build It, Will They Come? Predictors of Teachers’ Participation in and Satisfaction with the Effective Classroom Interactions Online Courses LoCasale-Crouch, Hamre, Roberts, Neesen Development Handbook (pp.253-264). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  27. Knowles, M.S, Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R.A. (2011). The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (7th ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  28. Kurthen, H., & Smith, G. (2006). Hybrid online face-to-face teaching: When is it an efficient tool? International Journal of Learning, 12(5), 237-245.
  29. Lebec, M., & Luft, J. (2007). A mixed methods analysis of learning in online teacher professional development: A case report. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(1), 554-574.
  30. Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593-618. Doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
  31. Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Education & Computers, 48(2), 185-204. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2004.12.004LoCasale-Crouch,J.,Kraft-Sayre,M.,Pianta,R.C.,Hamre,B.K.,Downer, J.T., Leach, A.,…
  32. Scott-Little, C. (2011). Implementing an early childhood professional development course across 10 sites and 15 sections: Lessons learned. NHSA Dialog, 14(4), 275-292.
  33. Maxwell, K.L., Lim, C.-I, & Early, D.M. (2006). Early childhood teacher preparation programs in the United States: National report. Chapel Hill, NC: the University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute.
  34. Mayer, R.E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760-769.
  35. Means, B. (2010). Technology and education change: Focus on student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 285-307.
  36. Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. New York, NY: Routledge. If You Build It, Will They Come? Predictors of Teachers’ Participation in and Satisfaction with the Effective Classroom Interactions Online Courses LoCasale-Crouch, Hamre, Roberts, Neesen
  37. Morris, L., Finnegan, C. & Wu, S. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221-231. Doi:10.1016/J.iheduc.2005.06.009
  38. Norris, D.J. (2010). Raising the educational requirements for teachers in infant toddler classrooms: Implications for institutions of higher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 31(2), 146-158. Doi:10.1080/10901021003781221
  39. O'Dwyer, L., Carey, R., & Kleiman, G. (2007). The Louisiana algebra online initiative as a model for teacher professional development: Examining teacher experiences. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(3), 69-93.
  40. Park, J.-H., & Choi, H.J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners' decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217.
  41. Peugh, J.L. & Enders, C.K. (2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525–556. .
  42. Pianta, R., Mashburn, A., Downer, J., Hamre, B., & Justice, L. (2008). Effects of Webmediated professional development resources on teacher-child interactions in prekindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(4), 431–451.
  43. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426.
  44. Rice, K. (2006). A comprehensive look at virtual education in the K-12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 425-448. Doi:10.1080/15391523.2006.10782468
  45. Richardson, J.C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
  46. Roblyer, M., Porter, M., Bielefeldt, T., & Donaldson, M. (2009). Teaching online made me a better teacher: Studying the impact of virtual course experiences on teachers’ face-to-face practice. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(4), 121-126. Doi:10.1080/10402454.2009.10784620
  47. Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Does online learning impede degree completion? A national study of community college students. Computers & Education, 75, 103-111. Doi:

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links