You are here:

WBT and Learning Motivation in Health and Nursing Education
Proceeding

, , Fernuniversität in Hagen, Germany ; , Fernuniversität in Hagen (Germany) and Open University of the Netherlands (The Netherlands), Netherlands

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-24-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

In the study the emphasis is put on web-based trainings (WBT). WBTs are the most common form of e-learning in on-the-job trainings in the private and public sector in Germany, whereas blended-learning scenarios and virtual classrooms are only used by 55% and 41% respectively. In spite of the increasing distribution of e-learning applications in sectors like higher education as well as private and professional further education, virtual teaching and learning scenarios are not widely used in the health and nursing education. Beside this deficit, the existing academic void of the motivational effect of a WBT in general proves the relevance of the research question: Does the use of the WBT have a positive effect on the learning motivation of the learners? The results collectively indicate that the acceptance of the participants during the use of the WBT has the highest positive impact on the learning motivation of the students.

Citation

Bern, L., Schulmann, C. & Bastiaens, T. (2016). WBT and Learning Motivation in Health and Nursing Education. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2016--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1002-1009). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 1, 2023 from .

© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Arnold, P., Kilian, L., Thillosen, A., & Zimmer, G. (2013). Handbuch E-Learning (3rd ed.). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
  2. Baacke, D. (1997). Medienpädagogik: Grundlagen der Medienkommunikation Band I. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
  3. Bühl, A. (2014). SPSS 22: Einführung in die moderne Datenanalyse (14th ed.). Hallbergmoos: Pearson.
  4. Böhler, C., Leinhardt, C., Robes, J., Sauter, W., Süß, M., & Wessendorf, K. (2011). Webbasiertes Lernen in Unternehmen-Entscheider/innen, Zielgruppen, Lernformen und Erfolgsfaktoren. In M. Ebner& S. Schön (Eds.), Lehrbuch für Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien. Retrieved from http://l3t.tugraz.at/index.php/LehrbuchEbner10/article/view/40 [21.09.2014]
  5. Chen, K.-C. (2007). Self-determination Theory: Implications for Motivation in Online Learning. In T. Bastiaens& S. Carliner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (pp. 6745–6750). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  6. Gagné, R., Wager, W., Golas, K., & Keller, J. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth. Keller, J.M. (1987a). Development and Use of the ARCS Model of Motivational Design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10.
  7. Kerres, M. (2012). Mediendidaktik (3rd ed.). München: Oldenbourg.
  8. Mao, J. & Thompson, M. (2007). ARCS Model and Instructional Design for Adult Learners in Online Learning Environment. In T. Bastiaens& S. Carliner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (pp. 1692–1695). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  9. Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  10. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Instrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
  11. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perpective. In E.L. Deci & R.M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of
  12. Schäfer, T. (2010). Statistik I: Deskriptive und Explorative Datenanalyse. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften / GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden.
  13. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections