You are here:

Collaborative knowledge in online learning environments.

, Penn State, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-24-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


Students are often expected to establish connections and share knowledge for group collaborative work in various cases. There often is significant imbalanced participation and contribution by each group member. Collaboration tools can be used to help ensure that each member contributes using online software tools. Students are able to improve learning with the assistance of the instructor and other students in this technique of creating a group knowledge map.


Taricani, E. (2016). Collaborative knowledge in online learning environments. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2016--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 739-743). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 11, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Chi, M.T.H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
  2. Chi, E.H., Gumbrecht, M., & Hong, L. (2007). Visual foraging of highlighted text: An eye-tracking study. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction, Part III (pp. 589–598). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  3. Clariana, R.B. (2010). Deriving individual and group knowledge structure from network diagrams and from essays. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N.M. Seel (Eds., Computer-Based Diagnostics and Systematic Analysis of Knowledge (pp. 117-130). New York, NY: Springer.
  4. Curşeu, P.L., Schalk, M.J.D., & Schruijer, S.G.L. (2010). The use of cognitive mapping in eliciting and evaluating group cognitions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1258-1291.
  5. Garbis, C., & Artman, H. (1998). Team communication and coordination as distributed cognition. Coop Third International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Cannes, France. Available from Pdf
  6. Gijlers, H., Weinberger, A., van Dijk, A.M., Bollen, L., & Van Joolingen, W. (2013). Collaborative drawing on a shared digital canvas in elementary science education: The effects of script and task awareness support. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 427-453.
  7. Gijlers Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 307-331. Doi:10.1080/10508400701413401
  8. Kraut, R.E., Fussell, S.R., & Siegel, J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 13-49.
  9. Lu, L., Yuan, Y.C., & McLeod, P.L. (2012). Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 54-75.
  10. Richardson, D.C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N.Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science, 18, 407-413. Available from Pdf
  11. Schneider, B., & Pea, R. (2013). Real-time mutual gaze perception enhances collaborative learning and collaboration quality. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8, 375-397.
  12. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
  13. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 7-44

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact