You are here:

Curriculum mapping: An automated solution
Proceeding

, , , University of Auckland Business School, New Zealand

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-24-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

An institution that maintains a triple crown accreditation will incur ‘license’ fees of US$265K per five-year cycle plus even more annual, internal costs associated with administrators, unique quality assurance processes, data capture, collection, and processing. A ‘worst case’ example is Vanderbilt University with an annual estimate of 5K hours and $2.92M! These institutional costs, if visible, seldom calculate the time consumed on the part of the “worker bees” who would rather do their research and teaching. A key process cycle is documenting the curriculum - which in most tertiary institutions is fraught with difficulties, mainly because the actual implementation of the curriculum is more of a negotiation process involving peers, heads of departments, deans and administrators. This paper discusses an innovative method to map and monitor a curriculum to relieve the costs and stress for everyone involved.

Citation

Gardner, L., Nguyen, A. & Sheridan, D. (2016). Curriculum mapping: An automated solution. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2016--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 325-330). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abbott, S. (2014). Hidden curriculum. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/hidden-curriculum
  2. Clawson, S. (2014). Preparing students for competency-based hiring. In Educause 2014. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/blogs/alexroth/preparing-students-competency-based-hiring
  3. Hughes, C., & Barrie, S. (2010). Influences on the assessment of graduate attributes in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 53(3), 325–334.
  4. Jacobs, H.H. (1997). Mapping the big picture: Integrating curriculum and assessment K–12. Alexandria, VA, USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  5. Jacobs, H.H. (2004). Getting results with curriculum mapping. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED489051
  6. Johnson, A., Carlile, C., Checkley, J., & Baker, R. (2006). Getting results with curriculum mapping. Nature (Vol. 334). Alexandria, VA, USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  7. Sharp, S., & Sparrow, H. (2002). Developing frameworks to embed graduate attributes in tertiary courses. In Educause. Retrieved from http://ctl.curtin.edu.au/events/conferences/tlf/tlf2002/abstracts/sharp-abs.html
  8. Weelan, B.S., & Elgart, M.A. (2015). The real costs of accreditation, and the process’s value. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2015/10/22/real-costs DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.