Evaluation of an Instructional Design and Technology Master Level Program
Enilda Romero-Hall, University of Tampa, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-24-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
This paper highlights the importance of evaluation by reviewing a case study of a master level instructional design and technology (ID&T) program. An electronic questionnaire with closed and open-ended items was used to survey current students (n = 20) and alumni (n = 11) of the program. The results of this program evaluation suggest that instructional design students in this master level program are focused on learning theoretical content as well as the required design and development skills needed to be successful instructional design practitioners. Both current students and alumni feel that the program is effective and that it allows them to reach their career goals. Suggestions were provided for core courses, electives, internship, and professional portfolio requirements. Instructional design educators may use this article as a teaching tool for program evaluation courses or as an opportunity to reflect on the formal evaluation needs of their own program.
Romero-Hall, E. (2016). Evaluation of an Instructional Design and Technology Master Level Program. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2016--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 229-235). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 17, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/172956/.
© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- King, J., & Stevahn, L. (2013). Interactive Evaluation Practice: Mastering the Interpersonal Dynamics of Program Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (Fourth Edition ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations. New York: Routledge.
- Tutkun, Ö. F., Erdoğan, D.G., & Demirtaş, Z. (2014). The Opinions of Students toward Curriculum of Distance Education Non-Thesis Master. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(2), 307-318.
- Waters, K. (2011). The Importance of Program Evaluation: A Case Study. Journal of Human Services, 31, 83-93.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.