You are here:

Transforming Pre-Service Teachers’ Metacognitive Planning and Self-efficacy in a Flipped Classroom Environment
PROCEEDING

, , Arkansas Tech University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate preservice teachers’ metacognitive planning and self-efficacy skills in flipped classroom setting. The investigators employed mixed with 80 pre-service teachers at a Midwestern university, (65 undergraduates, and 15 graduates). The results revealed significant and positive correlation between students’ metacognitive planning and self-efficacy. Students’ reflection indicated that it is essential for students to review the learning materials before the class time and collaborate with classmates on the classwork to capitalize on the flipped classroom setting. Students also indicated that the use of metacognitive skills questionnaire to make them aware of their own learning techniques influenced directly their own knowledge in meaningful and measurable ways, or as a student said” Through my metacognitive tests and reflections I have learned many ways for me to enhance my learning and I do a plethora of things now that I have never done before”.

Citation

Ibrahim, M. & Watts, A. (2016). Transforming Pre-Service Teachers’ Metacognitive Planning and Self-efficacy in a Flipped Classroom Environment. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1433-1444). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 22, 2019 from .

© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Abar, B., & Loken, E. (2010). Self-regulated learning and self-directed study in a pre-college sample. Learning and individual differences, 20(1), 25-29.
  2. Artino Jr, A. (2008). Learning online: Understanding academic success from a self-regulated learning perspective: ProQuest.
  3. Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental psychology, 25(5), 729.
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  5. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164180.
  6. Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Atlanta.
  7. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 199-231.
  8. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1-40.
  9. Borkowski, J., Chan, L., & Muthukrishna, N. (2000). 1. A Process-Oriented Model of Metacognition: Links Between Motivation and Executive Functioning.
  10. Butler, D., & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
  11. Cardenas, V. (2009). Metacognitive awarness-raising in EFL teacher education with special reference to a Chilean context: University of Birmingham.
  12. Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (2001). On the self-regulation of behavior: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies: Sage Publications, Inc.
  14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences: Routledge.
  15. Cornford, I. (2002). Learning-to-learn strategies as a basis for effective lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(4), 357-368.
  16. Coutinho, S. (2008). Self-efficacy, metacognition, and performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 165.
  17. Demetry, C. (2010). Work in Progress-An Innovation Merging "Classroom Flip" and Team-Based Learning. Paper presented at the the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington, DC.
  18. Dunlosky, J., & Bjork, R. (2013). Handbook of metamemory and memory: Psychology Press.
  19. Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. (2012). Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 271-280.
  20. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and coregulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277-287.
  21. Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6-25.
  22. Ellis, A., Bond, J., & Denton, D. (2012). An analytical literature review of the effects of metacognitive teaching strategies in primary and secondary student populations. AsiaPacific Journal of Educational Development, 1(1), 9-23.
  23. Everson, H., & Tobias, S. (1998). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 65-79.
  24. Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Schuyten, G. (2008). Relationships between student cognitions and their effects on study strategies. Learning and individual differences, 18(2), 271-278.
  25. Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. The nature of intelligence, 12, 231-235.
  26. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
  27. Hacker, D., Bol, L., & Keener, M. (2008). Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration. Handbook of metamemory and memory, 429455.
  28. Hammann, L., & Stevens, R. (1998). Metacognitive Awareness Assessment in Self-Regulated Learning and Performance Measures in an Introductory Educational Psychology Course.
  29. Houston, M. (2012). Humanizing the Classroom by Flipping the Homework versus Lecture Equation.
  30. Lackaye, T., & Margalit, M. (2006). Comparisons of achievement, effort, and self-perceptions among students with learning disabilities and their peers from different achievement groups. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 432-446.
  31. Lage, M., Platt, G., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
  32. Lenz, K., & Hughes, C. (1990). A word identification strategy for adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(3), 149-158.
  33. Linnenbrink, E., & Pintrich, P. (2003). The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Student Engagement and Learning in the Classroom. Reading& Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119-137.
  34. Lovett, M.C. (2008, January). Teaching metacognition. In Presentation to the Educause Learning Initiative Annual Meeting. Retrieved on September (Vol. 10, P. 2013).
  35. McCann, E., & Garcia, T. (1999). Maintaining motivation and regulating emotion: Measuring individual differences in academic volitional strategies. Learning and individual differences, 11(3), 259-279.
  36. Metcalfe, J. (1998). Cognitive optimism: Self-deception or memory-based processing heuristics? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 100-110.
  37. Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2007). Principles of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors, and feedback. Psychonomic Bulletin& Review, 14(2), 225-229.
  38. Middlebrooks, P., & Sommer, M. (2011). Metacognition in monkeys during an oculomotor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 325.
  39. Nietfeld, J., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Educational, 7-28.
  40. Ormrod, J., & Davis, K. (2004). Human learning: Merrill.
  41. Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents: IAP-Information Age Pub., Incorporated.
  42. Pieschl, S. (2009). Metacognitive calibration—an extended conceptualization and potential applications. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 3-31.
  43. Pintrich, P. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667.
  44. Pintrich, P. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
  45. Pintrich, P., Smith, D., García, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801813.
  46. Prins, F., Veenman, M., & Elshout, J. (2006). The impact of intellectual ability and metacognition on learning: New support for the threshold of problematicity theory. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 374-387.
  47. Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The Amer. Jrnl. Of Distance Education, 22(2), 72-89.
  48. Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 316): Springer.
  49. Schraw, G., Crippen, K., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 111-139.
  50. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
  51. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.
  52. Schunk, D. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 359-382.
  53. Schwartz, B., & Metcalfe, J. (1994). Methodological problems and pitfalls in the study of human metacognition.
  54. Scott, B., & Berman, A. (2013). Examining the domain-specificity of metacognition using academic domains and task-specific individual differences1. Australian Journal of Educational& Developmental Psychology, 13, 28-43.
  55. Seifert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational research, 46(2), 137-149.
  56. Sinkavich, F. (1994). Metamemory, attributional style, and study strategies: Predicting classroom performance in graduate students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 21, 172-172.
  57. Sperling, R., Howard, B., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117-139.
  58. Stewart, P., Cooper, S., & Moulding, L. (2007). Metacognitive development in professional educators. The Researcher, 21(1), 32-40.
  59. Stone, N. (2000). Exploring the relationship between calibration and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 12(4), 437-475.
  60. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
  61. Tobias, S., Everson, H., Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. (2009). The importance of knowing what you know: A knowledge monitoring framework for studying metacognition in education. Handbook of metacognition in education, 107-127.
  62. Vander Stel, M., & Veenman, M. (2010). Development of metacognitive skillfulness: A longitudinal study. Learning and individual differences, 20(3), 220-224.
  63. Veenman, M., & Spaans, M. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and individual differences, 15(2), 159-176.
  64. Walker, C., Greene, B., & Mansell, R. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and selfefficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and individual differences, 16(1), 1-12.
  65. Winne, P. (2004). Students’ calibration of knowledge and learning processes: Implications for designing powerful software learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 466-488.
  66. Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. Metacognition in educational theory and practice, 93, 27-30.
  67. Winne, P., & Nesbit, J. (2010). The psychology of academic achievement. Annual review of psychology, 61, 653678.
  68. Zaromb, F., Karpicke, J., & Roediger, H. (2010). Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: Effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 552.
  69. Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation: a social cognitive perspective. Handbook of self-regulation, 1339.
  70. Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.
  71. Zimmerman, B., & Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of selfregulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628.
  72. Zimmerman, B., & Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections