State Educational Twitter Hashtags: An Introduction and Research Agenda PROCEEDING
Joshua Rosenberg, Matthew Koehler, Michigan State University, United States ; Mete Akcaoglu, Georgia Southern University, United States ; Spencer Greenhalgh, Michigan State University, United States ; Erica Hamilton, Grand Valley State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
Affinity spaces refer to digital and geographical spaces in which learning can happen, and some of the largest affinity spaces dedicated to education are those that currently exist on Twitter. These spaces are public, largely unmoderated, and thriving, yet very little is known about them. This paper seeks to shed some light on these basic questions about Twitter-based affinity spaces by presenting descriptive data about the participants and their patterns of activity across 47 State Educational Twitter Hashtags, or SETHs. We examine over 580,000 tweets collected over six months and identify who is participating and their degree of activity. We conclude with directions for future research on SETHs (or related affinity spaces on Twitter) focused on participants’ individual characteristics, the structure of the affinity space, and the content of tweets.
Rosenberg, J., Koehler, M., Akcaoglu, M., Greenhalgh, S. & Hamilton, E. (2016). State Educational Twitter Hashtags: An Introduction and Research Agenda. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 355-360). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 20, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/171698/.
© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Britt, V.G., & Paulus, T. (2016). "Beyond the four walls of my building": A case study of #edchat as a community of practice. American Journal of Distance Education, 30, 48-59.
- Carpenter, J.P., & Krutka, D.G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: A survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46, 414-434.
- Gee, J.P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Junkins, S. (2014). Twitter chats for teachers (by state). Retrieved from https://sjunkins.wordpress.com/2014/07/28/twitter-chats-for-teachers-by-state/
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press.-360-SITE 2016-Savannah, GA, United States, March 21-26, 2016
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.