You are here:

Synchronous and Asynchronous E-Language Learning: A Case Study of Virtual University of Pakistan
ARTICLE

, Virtual University of Pakistan

Open Praxis Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 1369-9997 e-ISSN 1369-9997 Publisher: International Council for Open and Distance Education

Abstract

This case study evaluated the impact of synchronous and asynchronous E-Language Learning activities (ELL-tivities) in an E-Language Learning Environment (ELLE) at Virtual University of Pakistan. The purpose of the study was to assess e-language learning analytics based on the constructivist approach of collaborative construction of knowledge. The courses selected for random sampling were English Comprehension (Eng101), Business & Technical English (Eng201) and Business Communication (Eng301). Three methods were employed to collect the data: observation of the communication and performance on given channels, students’ opinions on Graded Discussion Board (GDB), and a survey questionnaire. Out of a total population of 9919, 1025 responses were received for the survey questionnaire. The findings revealed that asynchronous e-language learning was quite beneficial for second language (L2) learners, but with some limitations which could be scaffolded by synchronous sessions. Based on the findings, the researcher suggested a blend of both synchronous and asynchronous paradigms to create an ideal environment for e-language learning in Pakistan.

Citation

Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and Asynchronous E-Language Learning: A Case Study of Virtual University of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21-39. International Council for Open and Distance Education. Retrieved February 18, 2019 from .

This record was imported from OpenPraxis on March 7, 2016. [Original Record]

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. AbuSeileek, A.F. & Qatawneh, K. (2013). Effects of synchronous and asynchronous computermediated communication (CMC) oral conversations on English language learners’ discourse functions. Computers& Education, 62, 181–190. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.compedu.2012.10.013Asoodar,M.,Atai,M.R.,Vaezi,S., & Marandi, S.S. (2014). Examining effectiveness of communities of practice in online English for academic purposes (EAP) assessment in virtual classes. Computers& Education, 70, 291–300. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.compedu.2013.08.016
  2. Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K. (1999). Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, 161–181.
  3. Borg, S. & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 66(3), 283–292. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr065Chambers,F.(1980).Are-evaluationof needs analysis in ESP. The ESP Journal, 1(1), 25–33.
  4. Chen, C.M., & Lee, T.H. (2011). Emotion recognition and communication for reducing secondlanguage speaking anxiety in a web-based one-to-one synchronous learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 417–440.
  5. Crystal, D. (2012). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Dudley-Evans, T. & St John, M.J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic books.
  8. Garrison, D.R. & Anderson T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century. A Framework for Research and Practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  9. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
  10. Ge, Z.G. (2011). Exploring e-learners’ perceptions of net-based peer-reviewed English writing. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 75–91.
  11. Greller, W. & Drachsler, H. (2012). Translating learning into numbers: A generic framework for learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology& Society, 15(3), 42–57.
  12. Guichon, N. (2010). Preparatory study for the design of a desktop videoconferencing platform for synchronous language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(2), 169–182.
  13. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause quarterly, 31(4), 51–55. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0848.pdf Huang, X. & Hsiao, E.L. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment: Faculty experiences and perceptions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 15–30.
  14. Johns, A.M. (1991). English for specific purposes (ESP): Its history and contributions. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 67–75.
  15. Jordan, R.R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Keegan, D., Schwenke, E., Fritsch, H., Kenny, G., Kismihók, G., Bíró, M., Nix, J. (2005). Virtual classrooms in educational provision: synchronous e-learning systems for European institutions. FernUniversität ZIFF Papiere, 126.
  17. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of educational computing research, 32(2), 131–152.
  18. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers& Education, 49(3), 740–762. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.compedu.2005.11.012Krashen,S.D.(1982).Principlesand practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  19. Larsen-Freeman, D. & Anderson, M. (2013). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (3rd edition). Oxford University Press.
  20. Laurillard, D. (2007). Pedagogical forms of mobile learning: framing research questions. London: Institute of Education.
  21. Laurillard, D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge. 38 Ayesha Perveen
  22. Lin, H.S., Hong, Z.R., & Lawrenz, F. (2012). Promoting and scaffolding argumentation through reflective asynchronous discussions. Computers& Education, 59(2), 378–384. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.compedu.2012.01.019
  23. MacIntyre, P.D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K.A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: a situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.
  24. Martín-Blas, T. & Serrano-Fernández, A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers& Education, 52(1), 35–44. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.compedu.2008.06.005McBrien,J.L.,Cheng,R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing asynchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.
  25. McLuhan, M. (1995). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  26. Mellow, J.D. (2002). Towards principled eclecticism in language teaching: The two-dimensional model and the centering principle. TESL-EJ, 5(4), 1–18.
  27. Murphy, E., Rodríguez-Manzanares, M.A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583–591.
  28. Parsad, B. & Lewis, L. (2008). Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2006–07 (NCES 2009–044). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009044.pdf
  29. Pérez, L.C. (2013). Foreign language productivity in synchronous versus asynchronous computermediated communication. CALICO journal, 21(1), 89–104.
  30. Pfister, H.R. (2005). How to support synchronous net-based learning discourses: Principles and perspectives (pp. 39–57). Springer US.
  31. Polkinghorne, D.E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of counseling psychology, 52(2), 137.
  32. Reynolds, D., Wang, X., & Poor, H.V. (2002). Blind adaptive space-time multiuser detection with multiple transmitter and receiver antennas. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(6), 1261–1276. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2002.1003052Salmon,G.(2013).E-tivities:Thekey to active online learning. Routledge.
  33. Somenarain, L., Akkaraju, S., & Gharbaran, R. (2010). Student perceptions and learning outcomes in asynchronous and synchronous online learning environments in a biology course. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 353–356. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/Vol6no2/somenarain_0610.pdf
  34. Stein, P. & Newfield, D. (2006). Multiliteracies and multimodality in English in education in Africa: Mapping the terrain. English Studies in Africa, 49(1), 1–21.
  35. Sun, S.Y.H. (2011). Online language teaching: the pedagogical challenges. Knowledge Management& E-learning: An International Journal (KM & EL), 3(3), 428–447. Retrieved from http://www.kmeljournal.org/ojs/index.php/online-publication/article/view/89
  36. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance education, 22(2), 306–331. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
  37. Wang, Y. & Chen, N.S. (2009). Criteria for evaluating synchronous learning management systems: arguments from the distance language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 1–18. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588220802613773Watkins,C.,Carnell,E.,Lodge,C.& Whalley, C. (1996). Effective learning. The School Improvement Network, Research Matters, No. 5. Institute of Education, University of London.
  38. Watson, J., Gemin, B., Ryan, J., & Wicks, M. (2009). Keeping Pace with K-12 Online Learning: An Annual Review of State-Level Policy and Practice, 2009. Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535909.pdf West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language teaching, 27(01), 1–19.
  39. Yamagata-Lynch, L.C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1778/2837 Yang, Y.F. (2011). Engaging students in an online situated language learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 181–198. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.538700

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.