References

1. Adams, A.A., Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Rassool, N., & Williams, S. (2013). Use of open educational resources in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, in press.
2. Anderson, T., & McGreal, R. (2012). Disruptive pedagogies and technologies in universities. Education, Technology and Society, 15(4), 380-389. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/15_4/32.pdf.
3. Ardis, M.A., & Henderson, P.B. (2012). Software engineering education (SEEd): Is software engineering ready for MOOCs? ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 37(5), 14-14.
4. Bonino, R (2012). International student mobility: Status, trends and possible impact of e-learning and social media, media applications for business, learning and society. VCOBAM Conference Proceedings, 3(1), 81-91.
5. Bremer, C. (2012).New format for online courses: The open course future of learning. Proceedings of eLearning Baltics eLBa 2012. Retrieved from http://www.bremer.cx/vortrag67/Artikel_elba2012_opco_bremer.pdf
6. Bull, D. (2012). From ripple to tsunami: The possible impact of MOOCs on higher education. DE Quarterly, 2012 Spring, 10-11.
7. Butin, D.W. (2012). What MIT should have done. ELearn Magazine, June 2012. Retrieved from http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=2263018
8. Cabiria, J. (2012). Connectivist learning environments: Massive open online courses.The 2012 World Congress in Computer Science Computer Engineering and Applied Computing, Las Vagas, July 16-19, 2012. Retrieved from http://elrond.informatik.tu-freiberg.de/papers/WorldComp2012/EEE6065.pdf
9. Casey, D.M. (2008). A journey to legitimacy: The historical development of distance education through technology. TechTrends, 52(2), 45–51.
10. Corbyn, Z. (2012, December 6). This could be huge... Times Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26 & Storycode
11. Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/viewArticle/2012-18/html
12. DeWaard, I. (2011). Explore a new learning frontier: MOOCs. Learning Solutions Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/721/explore-a-new-learningfrontier-moocs/print
13. DeWaard, I., Abajian, S., Gallagher, M.S., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A., & Rodriguez, O.C. (2011). Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 94-115. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1046/2043
14. DeWaard, I., Koutropoulos, A., Keskin, N., Abajian, S.C., Hogue, R., Rodriguez, C.O., & Gallagher, M.S. (2011). Exploring the MOOC format as a pedagogical approach for mLearning. In Proceedings of 10th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (pp. 138-145).
15. Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism& Connective knowledge. Innovate, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article & Id=668
16. Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. Journal of Documentation, 45, 171–212.
17. Ellis, D., & Haugan, M. (1997). Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation, 53, 384–403.
18. Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The Case of the CCK08 course tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/643/1410
19. Fink, A. (2010). Conducting research literature reviews: From Internet to paper (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
20. Fournier, H., Kop, R., & Sitlia, H. (2011). The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 104-109).
21. Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008-2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 783-801.
22. Goldberg, C. (2001, April 4). Auditing classes at M.I.T., on the Web and free. The New York Times. Retrieved 2013 from http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/04/us/auditing-classes-at-mit-on-the-weband-free.html
23. Hyman, P. (2012). In the year of disruptive education. Communications of the ACM, 55(12), 20-22.
24. Kim, S. (2013, January 17). US software developer caught outsourcing his job to China. ABC News online.Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/story?id=18230346
25. Kirkwood, K. (2010). The wisdom of the clouds: Distributed learning, MOOCs, edupunks, and the challenge to formal education. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Open Source and Open Content (WOSOC) 2010 (pp. 96-103). Gunadarma University, Jakarta, Indonesia.
26. Kohil, S., & Kumar, E. (2011). Evolution of user dependent model to predict future usability of a search engine. In Information and Communication Technologies
27. Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2010). New dimensions to self-directed learning in an open networked learning environment. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 7(2).
28. Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Special IssueConnectivism: Design and Delivery of Social Networked Learning, 12(3). Retrieved from http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrccnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?action=rtdoc&an=18150443
29. Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J.S.F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Special Issue-Emergent Learning, Connections, Design for Learning, 12(7), 74-93.
30. Koutropoulos, A., & Hogue, R.J. (2012). How to succeed in a MOOC-Massive online open course. ELearning Guild, October 08, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.cedmaeurope.org/newsletter%20articles/eLearning%20Guild/How%20to%20Succee
31. Koutropoulos, A., Gallagher, M.S., Abajian, S.C., deWaard, I., Hogue, R.J., Keskin, N. Ö., & Rodriguez, C.O. (2012). Emotive vocabulary in MOOCs: Context& Participant retention. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=Special & Sp=init2 & Article=507
32. Lane, A., & McAndrew, P. (2010). Are open educational resources systematic or systemic change agents for teaching practice? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 952-962.
33. Liyanagunawardena, T.R. (2012). Information communication technologies and distance education in Sri Lanka: A case study of two universities (PhD Thesis). University of Reading, Reading.
34. MacIsaac, P.L. (2012). What a librarian can bring to your open online course development team. EDUCAUSE, 2012. Retrieved from http://auspace.athabascau.ca:8080/bitstream/2149/3218/2/MacIsaac_MOOC S_and_Information_literacy_draft_paper.docx
35. Mackness, J., Mak, S. & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, 266-275.
36. Mahraj, K. (2012). Using information expertise to enhance massive open online courses. Public Services Quarterly, 8(4), 359-368.
37. Mak, S., Williams, R., & Mackness, J. (2010). Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC. In Networked Learning Conference.University of Lancaster, Lancaster, 275-285.
38. Martin, F.G. (2012). Will massive open online courses change how we teach? Communications of the ACM, 55(8), 26-28. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2240246
39. Masters, K. (2011). A brief guide to understanding MOOCs. The Internet Journal of Medical Education, 1(2).
40. McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice, SSHRC Knowledge Synthesis Grant on the Digital Economy. Retrieved from http://www.edukwest.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/07/MOOC_Final.pdf
41. Mehaffy, G.L. (2012). Challenge and change. EDUCAUSE Review, September/October 2012, 25-41. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM1252.pdf
42. Milligan, C., Margaryan, A., & Littlejohn, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in massive open online courses. Journal of Online Learning with Technology (Special Issue on MOOCs) – Under Review.
43. Roberts, G. (2012). Open Line Project (Final Report). Oxford Brookes University. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/oer/brookes_final_report_101012.pdf
44. Roderick, S. (2008). Rethinking (e)learning: A manifesto for connected generations. Distance Education, 29(2), 153-164.
45. Rodriguez, C.O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=Special & Sp=init2 & Article=516
46. Sadigh, D., Seshia, S.A., & Gupta, M. (2012). Automating exercise generation: A step towards meeting the MOOC challenge for embedded systems. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Embedded Systems Education (WESE). Retrieved from http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~dsadigh/WESE12.pdf
47. Schrire, S., & Levy, D. (2012). Troubleshooting MOOCs: The case of a massive open online course at a college of education. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2012(1), 761-766.
48. Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Research blogs and the discussion of scholarly information. PLoS ONE, 7(5).
49. Shimbun, Y. (2011). Web exam leak rocks elite school/ Poster asked for answers in mathematics, English on Yahoo! Japan site. February 28, 2011. Retrieved from www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T110227003929.htm
50. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism-A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
51. Stewart, B. (2010). Social media literacies and perceptions of value in open online courses. Retrieved from http://portfolio.cribchronicles.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/11/612701_Social_Media_Literacies_MOOCs.pdf
52. Vardi, M.Y. (2012). Will MOOCs destroy academia? Communications of the ACM, 55(11). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2366317
53. Vihavainen, A., Luukkainen, M., & Kurhila, J. (2012). Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming. SIGITE’12, October 11–13, 2012, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, ACM. Retrieved http://sigite2012.sigite.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/08/session13-paper02.pdf
54. Weller, M. (2007). Learning objects, learning design, and adoption through succession. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 19(1), 26–47.
55. Zimmer, M. (2010). "But the data is already public": On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313-325.

Cited By

• MOOCs for language learning. Reality and prospects.

  Panagiotis Panagiotidis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

  Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2019 (Mar 18, 2019) pp. 540–546

• Decision, Implementation, and Confirmation: Experiences of Instructors behind Tourism and Hospitality MOOCs

  Jingjing Lin, USI Università della Svizzera italiana; Lorenzo Cantoni, Faculty of Communication Sciences, USI Università della Svizzera italiana

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 19, No. 1 (Feb 23, 2018)

• The rhizome: A problematic metaphor for teaching and learning in a MOOC

  Jenny Mackness, Frances Bell & Mariana Funes

  Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 32, No. 1 (Mar 23, 2016)

• Are Computer Adaptive Tests suitable for assessment in MOOCs

  Veronica Rossano, Enrica Pesare & Teresa Roselli

  Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Vol. 13, No. 3 (Sep 30, 2017)

• Chinese English Teachers' Perspectives on “Distributed Flip MOOC Blends”: From BMELTT to BMELTE

  Bin Zou, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China; Yuanyan Hu & Li Wei, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China; Marina Orsini-Jones, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom

  International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching Vol. 7, No. 4 (October 2017) pp. 1–14

• Massive Open Online Courses: Misperceptions of Completion Rates The Misalignment of Measurements and Actual Participation

  Anne Montgomery & Leo Mallette, University of Phoenix, United States

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2018 (Oct 15, 2018) pp. 850–857

• A Systematic Review of MOOC Research Methods and Topics: Comparing 2014-2016 and 2016-2017

  Meina Zhu, Annisa Sari & Curtis Bonk, Indiana University, United States

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2018 (Jun 25, 2018) pp. 1673–1682

• Supporting peer interactions in a MOOC: Utilizing social networking tools to personalize learning

  Nathaniel Ostashewski & Jon Dron, Athabasca University, Canada; Jennifer Howell, Curtin University, Australia

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2017 (Oct 17, 2017) pp. 833–845

• Instructor Experiences in Designing and Delivering Interactive MOOCs in Higher Education

  Meina Zhu, Curtis J. Bonk & Annisa Sari, Indiana University, United States

  E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2017 (Oct 17, 2017) pp. 509–515

• A Far Cry from School History: Massive Online Open Courses as a Generative Source for Historical Research

  Silvia Gallagher & Ciaran Wallace, The University of Dublin, Trinity College

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 5 (Sep 26, 2016)

• Trends and Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and Content Analysis of Research on MOOCs (2008-2015)

  Aras Bozkurt & Ela Akgn-zbek, Anadolu University; Olaf Zawacki-Richter, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 18, No. 5 (Aug 15, 2017)

• Understanding Learners’ Motivation and Learning Strategies in MOOCs

  Carlos Alario-Hoyos & Iria Estvez-Ayres, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Mar Prez-Sanagustn, Pontificia Universidad Catlica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Carlos Delgado Kloos & Carmen Fernndez-Panadero, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 12, 2017)

• Theories and Applications of Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) : The Case for Hybrid Design

  Abram Anders, University of Minnesota Duluth

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 6 (Dec 03, 2015)

• Does Formal Credit Work for MOOC-Like Learning Environments?

  Engin Kursun, Ataturk University

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 16, 2016)

• Online Video in Higher Education: Uses and Practices

  Joseph Chapes, University of Kansas, United States

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2017 (Jun 20, 2017) pp. 1133–1138

• Setting-up a European Cross-Provider Data Collection on Open Online Courses

  Marco Kalz & Karel Kreijns, Open University of the Netherlands; Jaap Walhout; Jonatan Castao-Munoz, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS); Anna Espasa, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya; Edmundo Tovar, Technical University Madrid

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 6 (Dec 03, 2015)

• A Systematic Analysis and Synthesis of the Empirical MOOC Literature Published in 2013–2015

  George Veletsianos, Royal Roads University; Peter Shepherdson

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 2 (Mar 01, 2016)

• Experience with a Massive Open Online Course in Rural Rwanda

  Christine Warugaba & Brienna Naughton, Partners in Health; Bethany Gauthier, Institution: Harvard Medical School, Partners In Health; Ernest Muhirwa & Cheryl Amoroso, Partners In Health

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 2 (Mar 01, 2016)

• A path analysis of educator perceptions of open educational resources using the technology acceptance model

  Hope Kelly, University of Florida

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 15, No. 2 (Apr 01, 2014)

• MOOCifying courses: real and authentic learning in higher education

  Jennifer Howell, Curtin University, Australia; Nathaniel Ostashewski, Athabasca University, Canada

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2015 (Jun 22, 2015) pp. 1663–1668

• University of Toronto Instructors' Experiences with Developing MOOCs

  Hedieh Najafi, Carol Rolheiser, Laurie Harrison & Stian Håklev

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 3 (Jun 19, 2015) pp. 233–255

• Learners’ goal profiles and their learning patterns over an academic year

  Clarence Ng, Learning Sciences Institute Australia, Australian Catholic University

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 3 (Jun 19, 2015)

• Implementation of MOOCs as Part of the Academic Curriculum at Tel Aviv University

  Tal Soffer & Anat Cohen, Tel Aviv University, Israel

  Global Learn 2015 (April 2015) pp. 724–730

• Evaluation of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Case Study

  Brenda Cecilia Padilla Rodríguez, University of Leicester, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico; Terese Bird, University of Leicester, United Kingdom; Gráinne Conole, University of Bath Spa, United Kingdom

  Global Learn 2015 (April 2015) pp. 527–535

• MOOCs, Communities and Distributed TPACK

  Paolo Paolini, Nicoletta DI Blas & Aldo Torrebruno, Politecnico di Milano, Italy

  Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 3364–3369

• IDT Experts' Views on Gamification Elements' Effectiveness in E-Learning Settings

  Can MEŞE, Onur Dönmez & Ö Özcan Dursun, Anadolu University, Turkey

  Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 815–817

• The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs

  Alexandria Radford, Jessica Robles, Stacey Cataylo & Laura Horn, RTI International; Jessica Thornton & Keith Whitfield, Duke University

  The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 15, No. 5 (Oct 06, 2014)

• Delivery Method and Persistence and Performance

  Jennifer Thomas, Pace University, United States; Danielle Morin & Samie Ly, Concordia University, Canada

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2014 (Jun 23, 2014) pp. 1797–1801

• Wicked problems in designing open online learning

  Margaret Lloyd & Michelle Mukherjee, Queensland University of Technology, Australia

  EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2014 (Jun 23, 2014) pp. 1347–1360

• Exploring Motivation in an Online Context: A Case Study

  Maggie Hartnett & Alison St. George, Massey University, New Zealand; Jon Dron, Athabasca University, Canada

  Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 14, No. 1 (March 2014) pp. 31–53

• Developing the Open Factors Instrument: An Implementation Questionnaire for Gauging Openness

  Fredrick W. Baker III, University of South Alabama, United States

  Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 1378–1385

• In their own words: Student stories of seeking learning support

  Mark Brown & Helen Hughes, Massey University; Mike Keppell & Natasha Hard, Charles Sturt University University of Southern Queensland; Liz Smith

  Open Praxis Vol. 5, No. 4 (Nov 26, 2013) pp. 345–354

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

• Full Text (external link)