MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012
Tharindu Liyanagunawardena, University of Reading ; Andrew Adams, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan ; Shirley Williams, University of Reading
IRRODL Volume 14, Number 3, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are a recent addition to the range of online learning options. Since 2008, MOOCs have been run by a variety of public and elite universities, especially in North America. Many academics have taken interest in MOOCs recognising the potential to deliver education around the globe on an unprecedented scale; some of these academics are taking a research-oriented perspective and academic papers describing their research are starting to appear in the traditional media of peer reviewed publications. This paper presents a systematic review of the published MOOC literature (2008-2012): Forty-five peer reviewed papers are identified through journals, database searches, searching the Web, and chaining from known sources to form the base for this review. We believe this is the first effort to systematically review literature relating to MOOCs, a fairly recent but massively popular phenomenon with a global reach. The review categorises the literature into eight different areas of interest, introductory, concept, case studies, educational theory, technology, participant focussed, provider focussed, and other, while also providing quantitative analysis of publications according to publication type, year of publication, and contributors. Future research directions guided by gaps in the literature are explored.
Liyanagunawardena, T., Adams, A. & Williams, S. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved June 10, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171313/.
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
- Adams, A.A., Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Rassool, N., & Williams, S. (2013). Use of open educational resources in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, in press.
- Anderson, T., & McGreal, R. (2012). Disruptive pedagogies and technologies in universities. Education, Technology and Society, 15(4), 380-389. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/15_4/32.pdf.
- Ardis, M.A., & Henderson, P.B. (2012). Software engineering education (SEEd): Is software engineering ready for MOOCs? ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 37(5), 14-14.
- Bonino, R (2012). International student mobility: Status, trends and possible impact of e-learning and social media, media applications for business, learning and society. VCOBAM Conference Proceedings, 3(1), 81-91.
- Bremer, C. (2012).New format for online courses: The open course future of learning. Proceedings of eLearning Baltics eLBa 2012. Retrieved from http://www.bremer.cx/vortrag67/Artikel_elba2012_opco_bremer.pdf
- Bull, D. (2012). From ripple to tsunami: The possible impact of MOOCs on higher education. DE Quarterly, 2012 Spring, 10-11.
- Butin, D.W. (2012). What MIT should have done. ELearn Magazine, June 2012. Retrieved from http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=2263018
- Cabiria, J. (2012). Connectivist learning environments: Massive open online courses.The 2012 World Congress in Computer Science Computer Engineering and Applied Computing, Las Vagas, July 16-19, 2012. Retrieved from http://elrond.informatik.tu-freiberg.de/papers/WorldComp2012/EEE6065.pdf
- Casey, D.M. (2008). A journey to legitimacy: The historical development of distance education through technology. TechTrends, 52(2), 45–51.
- Corbyn, Z. (2012, December 6). This could be huge... Times Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26 & Storycode
- Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/viewArticle/2012-18/html
- DeWaard, I. (2011). Explore a new learning frontier: MOOCs. Learning Solutions Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/721/explore-a-new-learningfrontier-moocs/print
- DeWaard, I., Abajian, S., Gallagher, M.S., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A., & Rodriguez, O.C. (2011). Using mLearning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 94-115. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1046/2043
- DeWaard, I., Koutropoulos, A., Keskin, N., Abajian, S.C., Hogue, R., Rodriguez, C.O., & Gallagher, M.S. (2011). Exploring the MOOC format as a pedagogical approach for mLearning. In Proceedings of 10th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (pp. 138-145).
- Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism& Connective knowledge. Innovate, 5(1). Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article & Id=668
- Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. Journal of Documentation, 45, 171–212.
- Ellis, D., & Haugan, M. (1997). Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation, 53, 384–403.
- Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The Case of the CCK08 course tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/643/1410
- Fink, A. (2010). Conducting research literature reviews: From Internet to paper (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
- Fournier, H., Kop, R., & Sitlia, H. (2011). The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 104-109).
- Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008-2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 783-801.
- Goldberg, C. (2001, April 4). Auditing classes at M.I.T., on the Web and free. The New York Times. Retrieved 2013 from http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/04/us/auditing-classes-at-mit-on-the-weband-free.html
- Hyman, P. (2012). In the year of disruptive education. Communications of the ACM, 55(12), 20-22.
- Kim, S. (2013, January 17). US software developer caught outsourcing his job to China. ABC News online.Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/story?id=18230346
- Kirkwood, K. (2010). The wisdom of the clouds: Distributed learning, MOOCs, edupunks, and the challenge to formal education. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Open Source and Open Content (WOSOC) 2010 (pp. 96-103). Gunadarma University, Jakarta, Indonesia.
- Kohil, S., & Kumar, E. (2011). Evolution of user dependent model to predict future usability of a search engine. In Information and Communication Technologies
- Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2010). New dimensions to self-directed learning in an open networked learning environment. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 7(2).
- Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Special IssueConnectivism: Design and Delivery of Social Networked Learning, 12(3). Retrieved from http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrccnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?action=rtdoc&an=18150443
- Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J.S.F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Special Issue-Emergent Learning, Connections, Design for Learning, 12(7), 74-93.
- Koutropoulos, A., & Hogue, R.J. (2012). How to succeed in a MOOC-Massive online open course. ELearning Guild, October 08, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.cedmaeurope.org/newsletter%20articles/eLearning%20Guild/How%20to%20Succee
- Koutropoulos, A., Gallagher, M.S., Abajian, S.C., deWaard, I., Hogue, R.J., Keskin, N. Ö., & Rodriguez, C.O. (2012). Emotive vocabulary in MOOCs: Context& Participant retention. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=Special & Sp=init2 & Article=507
- Lane, A., & McAndrew, P. (2010). Are open educational resources systematic or systemic change agents for teaching practice? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 952-962.
- Liyanagunawardena, T.R. (2012). Information communication technologies and distance education in Sri Lanka: A case study of two universities (PhD Thesis). University of Reading, Reading.
- MacIsaac, P.L. (2012). What a librarian can bring to your open online course development team. EDUCAUSE, 2012. Retrieved from http://auspace.athabascau.ca:8080/bitstream/2149/3218/2/MacIsaac_MOOC S_and_Information_literacy_draft_paper.docx
- Mackness, J., Mak, S. & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, 266-275.
- Mahraj, K. (2012). Using information expertise to enhance massive open online courses. Public Services Quarterly, 8(4), 359-368.
- Mak, S., Williams, R., & Mackness, J. (2010). Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC. In Networked Learning Conference.University of Lancaster, Lancaster, 275-285.
- Martin, F.G. (2012). Will massive open online courses change how we teach? Communications of the ACM, 55(8), 26-28. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2240246
- Masters, K. (2011). A brief guide to understanding MOOCs. The Internet Journal of Medical Education, 1(2).
- McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice, SSHRC Knowledge Synthesis Grant on the Digital Economy. Retrieved from http://www.edukwest.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/07/MOOC_Final.pdf
- Mehaffy, G.L. (2012). Challenge and change. EDUCAUSE Review, September/October 2012, 25-41. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM1252.pdf
- Milligan, C., Margaryan, A., & Littlejohn, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in massive open online courses. Journal of Online Learning with Technology (Special Issue on MOOCs) – Under Review.
- Roberts, G. (2012). Open Line Project (Final Report). Oxford Brookes University. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/oer/brookes_final_report_101012.pdf
- Roderick, S. (2008). Rethinking (e)learning: A manifesto for connected generations. Distance Education, 29(2), 153-164.
- Rodriguez, C.O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=Special & Sp=init2 & Article=516
- Sadigh, D., Seshia, S.A., & Gupta, M. (2012). Automating exercise generation: A step towards meeting the MOOC challenge for embedded systems. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Embedded Systems Education (WESE). Retrieved from http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~dsadigh/WESE12.pdf
- Schrire, S., & Levy, D. (2012). Troubleshooting MOOCs: The case of a massive open online course at a college of education. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2012(1), 761-766.
- Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Research blogs and the discussion of scholarly information. PLoS ONE, 7(5).
- Shimbun, Y. (2011). Web exam leak rocks elite school/ Poster asked for answers in mathematics, English on Yahoo! Japan site. February 28, 2011. Retrieved from www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T110227003929.htm
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism-A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
- Stewart, B. (2010). Social media literacies and perceptions of value in open online courses. Retrieved from http://portfolio.cribchronicles.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/11/612701_Social_Media_Literacies_MOOCs.pdf
- Vardi, M.Y. (2012). Will MOOCs destroy academia? Communications of the ACM, 55(11). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2366317
- Vihavainen, A., Luukkainen, M., & Kurhila, J. (2012). Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming. SIGITE’12, October 11–13, 2012, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, ACM. Retrieved http://sigite2012.sigite.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/08/session13-paper02.pdf
- Weller, M. (2007). Learning objects, learning design, and adoption through succession. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 19(1), 26–47.
- Zimmer, M. (2010). "But the data is already public": On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313-325.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
MOOCs for language learning. Reality and prospects.
Panagiotis Panagiotidis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2019 (Mar 18, 2019) pp. 540–546
Decision, Implementation, and Confirmation: Experiences of Instructors behind Tourism and Hospitality MOOCs
Jingjing Lin, USI Università della Svizzera italiana; Lorenzo Cantoni, Faculty of Communication Sciences, USI Università della Svizzera italiana
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 19, No. 1 (Feb 23, 2018)
The rhizome: A problematic metaphor for teaching and learning in a MOOC
Jenny Mackness, Frances Bell & Mariana Funes
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 32, No. 1 (Mar 23, 2016)
Are Computer Adaptive Tests suitable for assessment in MOOCs
Veronica Rossano, Enrica Pesare & Teresa Roselli
Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Vol. 13, No. 3 (Sep 30, 2017)
Chinese English Teachers' Perspectives on “Distributed Flip MOOC Blends”: From BMELTT to BMELTE
Bin Zou, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China; Yuanyan Hu & Li Wei, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China; Marina Orsini-Jones, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom
International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching Vol. 7, No. 4 (October 2017) pp. 1–14
Massive Open Online Courses: Misperceptions of Completion Rates The Misalignment of Measurements and Actual Participation
Anne Montgomery & Leo Mallette, University of Phoenix, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2018 (Oct 15, 2018) pp. 850–857
A Systematic Review of MOOC Research Methods and Topics: Comparing 2014-2016 and 2016-2017
Meina Zhu, Annisa Sari & Curtis Bonk, Indiana University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2018 (Jun 25, 2018) pp. 1673–1682
Supporting peer interactions in a MOOC: Utilizing social networking tools to personalize learning
Nathaniel Ostashewski & Jon Dron, Athabasca University, Canada; Jennifer Howell, Curtin University, Australia
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2017 (Oct 17, 2017) pp. 833–845
Instructor Experiences in Designing and Delivering Interactive MOOCs in Higher Education
Meina Zhu, Curtis J. Bonk & Annisa Sari, Indiana University, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2017 (Oct 17, 2017) pp. 509–515
A Far Cry from School History: Massive Online Open Courses as a Generative Source for Historical Research
Silvia Gallagher & Ciaran Wallace, The University of Dublin, Trinity College
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 5 (Sep 26, 2016)
Trends and Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and Content Analysis of Research on MOOCs (2008-2015)
Aras Bozkurt & Ela Akgn-zbek, Anadolu University; Olaf Zawacki-Richter, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 18, No. 5 (Aug 15, 2017)
Understanding Learners’ Motivation and Learning Strategies in MOOCs
Carlos Alario-Hoyos & Iria Estvez-Ayres, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Mar Prez-Sanagustn, Pontificia Universidad Catlica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Carlos Delgado Kloos & Carmen Fernndez-Panadero, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 18, No. 3 (May 12, 2017)
Theories and Applications of Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) : The Case for Hybrid Design
Abram Anders, University of Minnesota Duluth
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 6 (Dec 03, 2015)
Does Formal Credit Work for MOOC-Like Learning Environments?
Engin Kursun, Ataturk University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 3 (May 16, 2016)
Online Video in Higher Education: Uses and Practices
Joseph Chapes, University of Kansas, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2017 (Jun 20, 2017) pp. 1133–1138
Setting-up a European Cross-Provider Data Collection on Open Online Courses
Marco Kalz & Karel Kreijns, Open University of the Netherlands; Jaap Walhout; Jonatan Castao-Munoz, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS); Anna Espasa, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya; Edmundo Tovar, Technical University Madrid
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 6 (Dec 03, 2015)
A Systematic Analysis and Synthesis of the Empirical MOOC Literature Published in 2013–2015
George Veletsianos, Royal Roads University; Peter Shepherdson
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 2 (Mar 01, 2016)
Experience with a Massive Open Online Course in Rural Rwanda
Christine Warugaba & Brienna Naughton, Partners in Health; Bethany Gauthier, Institution: Harvard Medical School, Partners In Health; Ernest Muhirwa & Cheryl Amoroso, Partners In Health
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 2 (Mar 01, 2016)
A path analysis of educator perceptions of open educational resources using the technology acceptance model
Hope Kelly, University of Florida
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 15, No. 2 (Apr 01, 2014)
MOOCifying courses: real and authentic learning in higher education
Jennifer Howell, Curtin University, Australia; Nathaniel Ostashewski, Athabasca University, Canada
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2015 (Jun 22, 2015) pp. 1663–1668
University of Toronto Instructors' Experiences with Developing MOOCs
Hedieh Najafi, Carol Rolheiser, Laurie Harrison & Stian Håklev
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 3 (Jun 19, 2015) pp. 233–255
Learners’ goal profiles and their learning patterns over an academic year
Clarence Ng, Learning Sciences Institute Australia, Australian Catholic University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 3 (Jun 19, 2015)
Implementation of MOOCs as Part of the Academic Curriculum at Tel Aviv University
Tal Soffer & Anat Cohen, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Global Learn 2015 (April 2015) pp. 724–730
Evaluation of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Case Study
Brenda Cecilia Padilla Rodríguez, University of Leicester, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico; Terese Bird, University of Leicester, United Kingdom; Gráinne Conole, University of Bath Spa, United Kingdom
Global Learn 2015 (April 2015) pp. 527–535
MOOCs, Communities and Distributed TPACK
Paolo Paolini, Nicoletta DI Blas & Aldo Torrebruno, Politecnico di Milano, Italy
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 3364–3369
IDT Experts' Views on Gamification Elements' Effectiveness in E-Learning Settings
Can MEŞE, Onur Dönmez & Ö Özcan Dursun, Anadolu University, Turkey
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 815–817
The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs
Alexandria Radford, Jessica Robles, Stacey Cataylo & Laura Horn, RTI International; Jessica Thornton & Keith Whitfield, Duke University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 15, No. 5 (Oct 06, 2014)
Delivery Method and Persistence and Performance
Jennifer Thomas, Pace University, United States; Danielle Morin & Samie Ly, Concordia University, Canada
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2014 (Jun 23, 2014) pp. 1797–1801
Wicked problems in designing open online learning
Margaret Lloyd & Michelle Mukherjee, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2014 (Jun 23, 2014) pp. 1347–1360
Exploring Motivation in an Online Context: A Case Study
Maggie Hartnett & Alison St. George, Massey University, New Zealand; Jon Dron, Athabasca University, Canada
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 14, No. 1 (March 2014) pp. 31–53
Developing the Open Factors Instrument: An Implementation Questionnaire for Gauging Openness
Fredrick W. Baker III, University of South Alabama, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (Mar 17, 2014) pp. 1378–1385
In their own words: Student stories of seeking learning support
Mark Brown & Helen Hughes, Massey University; Mike Keppell & Natasha Hard, Charles Sturt University University of Southern Queensland; Liz Smith
Open Praxis Vol. 5, No. 4 (Nov 26, 2013) pp. 345–354
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.