You are here:

Caring dialogue: A step toward realising the dream of online learning communities

, AUT University ; , University of Southern Queensland

ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference, ISBN 978-1-74138-403-1 Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education


Online educators dream of facilitating interpersonal interactions equivalent to those in face -to-face classrooms as an important factor for promoting learning in online classes. Many current university students are comfortable with online networks as social spaces where they interact with family and friends, but they need help in making them effective as places of learning. A design research study found that the caring dimension of Lipman’s (2003) community of inquiry was fundamental to supporting the critical and creative dialogues necessary for development of higher order thinking. It developed and refined an interactive website that may support online educators in realizing the dream of building relationships that mo re effectively support learning.


Swann, J. & Albion, P. (2013). Caring dialogue: A step toward realising the dream of online learning communities. In Proceedings of Electric Dreams. Proceedings ascilite 2013 Sydney (pp. 854-864). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved February 24, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Amiel, T., & Reeves, T.C. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking Technology and the research agenda. Educational Technology& Society, 11(4), 29–40.
  2. Brookfield, S. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning: A comprehensive analysis of principles and effective practices (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  3. Brookfield, S. (2003). Adult cognition as a dimension of lifelong learning. In J. Field& M. Leicester (Eds.), Lifelong learning: Education across the lifespan. London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
  4. Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
  5. Davey, S. (2006). Consensus, caring and community: An inquiry into dialogue. Analytic Teaching, 25(1), 18– 51.
  6. De Bono, E. (1987). Six thinking hats. London, UK: Penguin.
  7. De Laat, M. (2006). Networked Learning. Apeldoorn, Netherlands: Politieacademie.
  8. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational enquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
  9. Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. 3–19). Springer Netherlands.
  10. Fine, L. (2011). The SWOT analysis (ebook). LLC: Kick It.
  11. Flecha, R. (2000). Sharing words: Theory and practice of dialogic learning. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  12. Gaggioli, A., Riva, G., Milani, L., & Mazzoni, E. (2013). Analyzing the experience of networked flow through social network analysis. In Networked Flow (pp. 71–99). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. Retrieved from
  13. Kelly, A.E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115–128.
  14. Laurillard, D. (2013). Foreword to the second edition. In Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed.). Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  15. Lingis, A. (1994). The community of those who have nothing in common. Bloomington, IA: Indiana University.
  16. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mercer, N., & Hodgkinson, S. (Eds.). (2008). Exploring classroom talk. London, UK: Sage.
  17. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London, UK: Routledge.
  18. Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California.
  19. Reed, R.F., & Johnson, T.F. (1999). Friendship and moral education: Twin pillars of philosophy for children. New York, NY: P Lang.
  20. Reeves, T.C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravmeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). London, UK: Routledge.
  21. Scott, J.P., & Carrington, P. (2011). Social network analysis: An introduction. In P. Carrington& J.P. Scott (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  22. Sprod, T. (2001). Philosophical discussion in moral education: The community of ethical inquiry. London, UK: Routledge.
  23. Swann, J. (2010). A dialogic approach to online facilitation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1),
  24. Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture: Changing the way we argue and debate. New York, NY: Virago.
  25. Tanner, J.L., Arnett, J.J., & Leis, J.A. (2009). Emerging adulthood: Learning and development during the first stage of adulthood. In M.C. Smith& N. DeFrates-Densch (Eds.), Handbook of research on adult learning and development (pp. 34–67). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  26. Vella, J. (2002). Learning to listen, Learning to teach: The power of dialogue in educating adults (Revised.). San Fancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  27. Wegerif, R. (2010). Mind expanding: Teaching for thinking and creativity in primary education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University.
  28. Wegerif, R., Chamrada, M., de Laat, M., Williams, M., Mansour, N., & Hever, R. (2009). ARGUNAUT deliverable D5.2: Patterns of interaction and intervention rules. Retrieved from

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact