You are here:

Factors to consider when designing writing groups for off- campus doctoral candidates

, , Macquarie University

ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference, ISBN 978-1-74138-403-1 Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Abstract

In this paper, we outline factors to consider when organizing writing groups for off-campus doctoral candidates, identifying possible design options and the broader considerations that should inform which options are taken. We begin by reviewing issues typically faced by doctoral candidates pursuing their degrees at a distance, such as social isolation and limited access to resources and communities of practice. We then draw on prior studies on doctoral education to discuss ways of meeting the logistical, sustainability and pedagogical demands to be considered by institutions seeking to improve the experience of their off -campus doctoral candidates. We argue that writing groups conducted via CMC tools have the potential to address a number of the issues identified and conclude by outlining a framework capable of informing relevant stakeholders in designing writing groups for off-campus doctoral candidates.

Citation

Kozar, O. & Lum, J. (2013). Factors to consider when designing writing groups for off- campus doctoral candidates. In Proceedings of Electric Dreams. Proceedings ascilite 2013 Sydney (pp. 498-502). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved December 15, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Aitchison, C. (2009). Writing groups for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 905-916.
  2. Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 265-278.
  3. Albion, P., & Erwee, R. (2011). Preparing for doctoral supervision at a distance: lessons from experience. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference.
  4. Ali, A., Kohun, F., & Cohen, E. (2006). Dealing with isolation feelings in IS doctoral programs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1(1), 21-33.
  5. Caffarella, R.S., & Barnett, B.G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39-52.
  6. Casanave, C.P., & Hubbard, P. (1992). The writing assignments and writing problems of doctoral students: Faculty perceptions, pedagogical issues, and needed research. English for Specific Purposes, 11(1), 33-49.
  7. Chiang, K.-H. (2003). Learning experiences of doctoral students in UK universities. International journal of sociology and social policy, 23(1/2), 4-32.
  8. Cotterall, S. (2011). Doctoral students writing: where's the pedagogy? Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 413-425.
  9. Deem, R., & Brehony, K.J. (2000). Doctoral Students' Access to Research Cultures-are some more unequal than others? Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-165.
  10. Eastmond, D.V. (1995). Alone but together: Adult distance study through computer conferencing. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
  11. Erwee, R., & Albion, P.R. (2011). New communication media challenges for supervisors and external doctoral students. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE 2011) (pp. 252-259). Association for the Advancement of Computing in
  12. Evans, T., Hickey, C., & Davis, H. (2005). Research issues arising from doctoral education at a distance. Research in Distance Education, 6, 120-131.
  13. Ferguson, T. (2009). The ‘Write’ Skills and More: A Thesis Writing Group for Doctoral Students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 285-297. ascilite Conference 2013 Proceedings Page 501
  14. Huang, C.-K., Chen, Y.-H., Olmanson, J., Sung, W.H., & Kim, Y.S. (2010). On Initiating Maintaining and Growing an Affinity Based Student Led Research and Design Group. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2010, Toronto, Canada. Http://www.editlib.org/p/35183 Kahn, J.H., & Scott, N.A. (1997). Predictors of research productivity and science-related career goals among counseling psychology doctoral students. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(1), 38-67.
  15. Kamler, B. & Thomson, P. (2006) Helping Doctoral Students Write: pedagogies for supervision. London/New York: Routledge
  16. Katz, E.L. (1997). Key players in the dissertation process. New Directions for Higher Education, 1997(99), 516.
  17. Lindner, J.R., Dooley, K.E., & Murphy, T.H. (2001). Differences in competencies between doctoral students on‐campus and at a distance. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 25-40. Doi:10.1080/08923640109527082
  18. Lovitts, B.E., & Nelson, C. (2000). The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from Ph. D. Programs. Academe, 86(6), 44-50.
  19. Mercer, T., Kythreotis, A., Lambert, C., & Hughes, G. (2011). Student-led research training within the PhD:“PhD experience” conferences. International Journal for Researcher Development, 2(2), 152-166.
  20. Palincsar, A.S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual review of psychology, 49(1), 345-375.
  21. Rose, M., & McClafferty, K.A. (2001). A call for the teaching of writing in graduate education. Educational Researcher, 30(2), 27-33.
  22. RMIT Study and Learning Centre (2013). Research writing group kit. Retrieved from: http://emedia.rmit.edu.au/learninglab/content/research-writing-group-kit Sterling, S.R. (2001). Sustainable Education– Revisioning Learning and Change, Dartington, UK : Schumacher Briefings, Green Books
  23. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society:The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.