An Investigation of Concept Mapping to Improve the Reading Comprehension of Science Texts
ARTICLE
Kevin Oliver
Journal of Science Education and Technology Volume 18, Number 5, ISSN 1059-0145
Abstract
This study investigated how well 74 6th-grade science students represented text structures from a 900-word textbook chapter on soil conservation, given a concept map template with four superordinate terms and 24 unsorted concepts. Findings suggest students were more successful at classifying pre-selected terms under given superordinate categories than they were at fully identifying relevant concept sets and articulating three different relationship types between terms. No significant differences were noted in the mapping performance of students at different reading levels. About two-third of students indicated they enjoyed concept mapping and would prefer to both read and map rather than just read without mapping. Students also expressed a strong preference for mapping in pairs or small groups compared to mapping alone. Multiple recommendations are provided for improving the relational thinking of students tasked with concept mapping expository science texts, including bridging to more open-ended maps, embedding mapping in longer-term inquiry projects, and leveraging collaborative and tool-based scaffolds.
Citation
Oliver, K. (2009). An Investigation of Concept Mapping to Improve the Reading Comprehension of Science Texts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 402-414. Retrieved March 23, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/166941/.

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.
Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.
Keywords
Cited By
View References & Citations Map-
Fostering Multimedia Learning with Collaborative Concept Mapping: The Effect of Cognitive Aid on Performance and on Collaboration
Santiago Roger Acuña, Gabriela López Aymes & Carlos Sergio López Medrano
International Journal of Higher Education Vol. 3, No. 2 (2014) pp. 141–152
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.