You are here:

Self-Regulated Strategy Development in Writing: Going beyond NLEs to a More Balanced Approach

, ,

ISAIJLS Volume 36, Number 5, ISSN 0020-4277


In this article, we present an argument for consideration by those researching and promoting new learning environments (NLEs). We believe advocates of NLEs should consider the literature and research base indicating effective instruction is not based on a forced dichotomy between theoretical perspectives, but rather a thoughtful, pragmatic blending of practices based on evidence gained from various perspectives and lines of research. While unguided or minimally guided instructional approaches are popular and intuitively appealing, these approaches ignore substantial evidence indicating these approaches are less effective and less efficient than instructional approaches that incorporate guidance of the learning process that is faded as internal guidance is developed (Kirschner et al., Educ Psychol 41:75-86, 2006). We illustrate how integrating evidence from multiple theoretical perspectives leads to the development of more powerful approaches to learning and instruction through a review of the premises, evolution, and research behind Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD) in the area of writing.


Harris, K.R., Santangelo, T. & Graham, S. (2008). Self-Regulated Strategy Development in Writing: Going beyond NLEs to a More Balanced Approach. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 36(5), 395-408. Retrieved April 1, 2020 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on December 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.