Our Designs and the Social Agendas They Carry
Journal of the Learning Sciences Volume 16, Number 2, ISSN 1050-8406
Although the work of learning scientists and instructional designers has brought about countless curricula, designs, and theoretical claims, the community has been less active in communicating the explicit and implicit critical social agendas that result (or could result) from their work. It is our belief that the community of learning scientists is well positioned to build transformative models of what could be, to develop learning and teaching interventions that have impact, and to advance theory that will prove valuable to others. This potential, we argue, would be significantly heightened if we as a community embrace the critical agendas that are central to so many discussions in anthropology, philosophy, or even curriculum development more generally. Instead of simply building an artifact to help individuals accomplish a particular task, or to meet a specific standard, the focus of critical design work is to develop sociotechnical structures that facilitate individuals in critiquing and improving themselves and the societies in which they function, and then we use our understanding of participation with these structures to advance theory. As an example of critical design work, we describe the Quest Atlantis project and the methodology used in its creation.
Barab, S., Dodge, T., Thomas, M.K., Jackson, C. & Tuzun, H. (2007). Our Designs and the Social Agendas They Carry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 263-305.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Using Social Media and Video Conferencing to Extend Design-Based Research (DBR) for Conceptualizing Learning in the School for Today
Basiyr Rodney, Webster University, United States; Merlene Gilb, John Simpson, Kristin Denbow & Jason Heisel, Webster Groves School District, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 1277–1285
Same content, different context: Advancing designs to position teachers as active agents in gaming environments.
Maria Solomou, Sinem Siyahhan & Adam Ingram-Goble, Indiana University Bloomington, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2011 (Jun 27, 2011) pp. 3518–3523
Robert Wright & Debbie Blackwell, University of North Texas, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (Mar 02, 2009) pp. 1598–1602
Gail Fitzgerald, University of Missouri-Columbia, United States; Kevin Koury & Katherine Mitchem, California University of Pennsylvania, United States; Candice Hollingsead, Bethel College, United States; Kevin Miller, Buffalo State College, United States; Meeaeng Ko Park, University of Missouri-Columbia, United States; Hui-Hsien Tsai, SUNY Empire State College, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 17, No. 1 (January 2009) pp. 31–63
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.