You are here:

Teaching STEM Through Historical Reconstructions: The Future Lies in the Past ARTICLE

, James Madison University, United States ; , California State University, Long Beach, United States ; , Georgia State University, United States ; , International Technology and Engineering Educator Association, United States

CITE Journal Volume 15, Number 3, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA


Although we would agree that the components of STEM do not need to be taught all together, all the time, authentic exemplary integrated STEM curricula are difficult to find. When educators refer to integrated STEM teaching and learning, they often mean SM (science and math) or TE (technology and engineering), and one might even find STM or SEM. Integrated STEM is defined in this paper as a lesson that combines all aspects of STEM: science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in a unique way that is dependent upon all of the fields.


Slykhuis, D.A., Lisa, M.H., Thomas, C.D. & Barbato, S. (2015). Teaching STEM Through Historical Reconstructions: The Future Lies in the Past. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 255-264. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved October 17, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Achieve Inc.(2013). Next generation
  2. Carnegie Science Center. (2014). Work to do: The role of STEM education in improving the tri-state region's workforce (Report). Retrieved from
  3. Choi, M. (2006). Communities of practice: An alternative learning model for knowledge creation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 143-146.
  4. Common Core Standards Initiative. (2015). Standards for mathematical practice. Retrieved from
  5. Earnest, J. (2015, March 23). President Obama announces over $240 million in new STEM commitments at the 2015 WhiteHouse Science Fair (fact sheet). Retrieved from the WhiteHouse Briefing Room website: DASHDASH
  6. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Duncan, R.G., & Chinn, C.A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006).Educational Psychologist, 42, 99-107.
  7. International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). Standards for students. Retrieved from
  8. International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. (2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Retrieved from
  9. Locke, G. (2011, July 14). STEM jobs help America win the future (blog post). Retrieved from The WhiteHouse Blog:
  10. National Technology Leadership Coalition. (2009). Retrieved from
  11. Pasley,J., & Miller, B.(2012). Professional learning communities for mathematics/science education improvement: What do we know? (National Science Foundation's Mathematics and Science Partnership webinar). Retrieved from
  12. Watson, G.H., & Groh, S.E. (2001). Faculty mentoring faculty: The Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education. In B.J. Duch, S.E. Groh, & D.E. Allen (Eds.),The power of problem-based learning: A practical 'how to' for teaching courses in any discipline (pp. 13-25). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  13. Williams, J. (2011). STEM education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education, 16, 26-35.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact