You are here:

Linking Learning Styles and Learning on Mobile Facebook
ARTICLE

IRRODL Volume 16, Number 2, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

With continued development of related technologies, Web 2.0 has become an important site of learning innovation. In particular, social networking sites such as Facebook, which have become popular, have the potential to function as an educational tool enabling peer feedback, interaction, and learning in a social context. Preparing appropriate environments for learners with different needs is essential to learning in general and online learning in particular. Yet, in order to create such learning environments, educators must understand differences in students' learning styles. Although some research focuses on the effects of individual differences such as age and gender on the use of social networking sites, experimental research related to students' learning styles is still limited. This study used Kolb's Learning Style Model to investigate differences in student learning outcomes and satisfaction using mobile Facebook for learning, according to learning style. Results showed that participants with "Assimilating" and "Diverging" learning styles performed better than those with "Accomodating" and "Converging" learning styles did and had higher self-efficacy, observational modelling and habit strength toward learning in mobile Facebook. The paper also makes suggestions for integrating mobile Facebook into class and recommendations for future research.

Citation

Chen, Y.c. (2015). Linking Learning Styles and Learning on Mobile Facebook. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 94-114. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on November 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71–80.
  2. Aragon, S.R., Johnson, S.D., & Shaik, N. (2002). The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 227-243.
  3. Arnold, N. & Paulus, T. (2010). Using a social networking site for experiential learning: Appropriating, lurking, modeling and community building. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80.
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  5. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184.
  6. Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge Press.
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  8. Baran, B. (2010). Facebook as a formal instructional environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 146-149.
  9. Baranowski, T., Perry, C., & Parcel, G. (1997). How individuals, environments, and health behaviour interact: Social cognitive theory. In K. Glanz, F.M. Lewis, & B.K. Rimer (Eds.), Health behaviour and health promotion (pp. 143-178). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  10. Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2014). Analyzing the effect of learning styles and study habits of distance learners on learning performances: A case of an introductory programming course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(4), 161-185.
  11. Chen, Y. (2014). The effect of using a Facebook group as a learning management system. Computers in Education Journal, 5(4), 42-53.
  12. Chou, H. & Wang, T. (2000). The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training. International Journal of Information Management, 20(6), 455-472.
  13. Duncan, D.G. & Barczyk, C.C. (2013). Facebook in the university classroom: Do students perceive that it enhances community of practice and sense of community? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(3), 1-14.
  14. Facebook (2014). Company info. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/
  15. Friesen, N. & Lowe, S. (2012). The questionable promise of social media for education: Connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 183–194.
  16. Gabarre, S., Gabarre, C., Din, R., Shah, P.M., & Karim, A.A. (2013). Using mobile Facebook as an LMS: Exploring impeding factors. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 13(3), 99– 115.
  17. García, P., Schiaffino, S. & Amandi, A. (2008). An enhanced Bayesian model to detect students’ learning styles in web-based courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 305– 315.
  18. García-Martín, J. & García-Sánchez, J.N. (2013). Patterns of Web 2.0 tool use among young Spanish people. Computers& Education, 67, 105–120.
  19. Graf, S., Liu, T.-C., & Kinshuk (2010). Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 116–131.
  20. Griggs, S.A. (1991). Learning styles counseling. ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Personnel Services, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  21. Hsu, C.H.C. (1999). Learning styles of hospitality students: Nature or nurture? Hospitality Management, 18, 17–30.
  22. Hwang, A., Kessler, E.H., & Francesco, A.M. (2004). Student networking behaviour, culture, and grade performance: An empirical study and pedagogical recommendations. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(2), 139–150.
  23. Irwin, C., Ball, L., Desbrow, B., & Leveritt, M. (2011). Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1221–32.
  24. Khang, H., Han, E., & Ki, E. (2014). Exploring influential social cognitive determinants of social media use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 36, 48-55.
  25. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  26. Kolb, D.A. (1999). Learning Style Inventory. Version 3. Hay/McBer Training Resources Group, Boston.
  27. Kolb, A.Y., & Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 193– 212.
  28. LaRose, R., & Eastin, M.S. (2004). A social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48(3), 358-377.
  29. LaRose, R., Mastro, D., & Eastin, M.S. (2001). Understanding Internet usage: Social cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 395-413.
  30. Law, B. & Hall, C. (2009). Observational learning use and self-efficacy beliefs in adult sport novices. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(2), 263-270.
  31. Lee, D., Kim, H.S., & Kim, J.K. (2012). The role of self-construal in consumers electronic word of mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites: A social cognitive approach. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28(3), 1054-1062.
  32. Lee, C.S. & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28, 331-339.
  33. Lee, M.J.W., & McLoughlin, C. (2008). Harnessing the affordances of Web 2.0 and social software tools: Can we finally make “student-centered” learning a reality? In Papers Presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (eds. Luca J. & Weippl E.), pp. 3825–3834. Association for the
  34. Lin, P.C., Hou, H.T., Wang, S.M., & Chang, K.E. (2013). Analyzing knowledge dimensions and cognitive process of a project-based online discussion instructional activity using Facebook in an adult and continuing education course. Computers& Education, 60(1), 110–121.
  35. Lu, H., Jia, L., Gong, S., & Clark, B. (2007). The relationship of Kolb learning styles, online learning behaviours and learning outcomes. Educational Technology& Society, 10(4), 187–196.
  36. Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141–155.
  37. Manca, S. & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 487-504.
  38. Manochehr, N.N. (2006). The influence of learning styles on learners in e-learning environments: An empirical study. Cheer Virtual Edition, 18, 10-14.
  39. Mason, R. (2006). Learning technologies for adult continuing education. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 121–3133.
  40. Mbati, L. (2013). Online social media applications for constructivism and observational learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 166-185.
  41. Meishar-Tal, H., Kurtz, G., & Pieterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 33-48.
  42. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0? Retrieved from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web20.html
  43. Özgen, K. & Bindak, R. (2012). Examining student opinions on computer use based on the learning styles in mathematics education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 79-93.
  44. Pan, C., Gunter, G., Sivo, S., & Cornell, R. (2005). End-user acceptance of a learning management system in two hybrid large-sized introductory undergraduate courses. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33(4), 355-365 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Linking Learning Styles and Learning on Mobile Facebook Chen
  45. Pimmer, C., Linxen, S., & Grohbiel, U. (2012). Facebook as a learning tool? A case study on the appropriation of social network sites from mobile phones in developing countries. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 726–738.
  46. Podolny, M., & Baron, J.N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673–693.
  47. Popescu, E. (2010). Adaptation provisioning with respect to learning styles in a web-based educational system: An experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 243–257.
  48. Rambe, P. (2013). Converged social media: Identity management and engagement on Facebook Mobile and blogs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 315–336.
  49. Sánchez, R.A., Cortijo, V., & Javed, U. (2014). Students’ perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers& Education, 70, 138-149.
  50. Seibert, S.E., Kraimer, M.L., & Liden, R.C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219–237.
  51. Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 157-174.
  52. Smith, D.M., & Kolb, D.A. (1996). User’s guide for the Learning Style Inventory. McBer and Company, Boston.
  53. Stefanone, M.A., Lackaff, D., & Rosen, D. (2010). The relationship between traditional mass media and “social media”: Reality television as a model for social network site behaviour. Journal of Electronic Media, 54(3), 508-525.
  54. Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S.M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G. (2008) Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 420–433.
  55. Sun, K.T., Lin, Y.C., & Yu, C.J. (2008). A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a Web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Computers& Education, 50(4), 1411–1422.
  56. Teo, T. (2014). Modelling Facebook usage among university students in Thailand: The role of emotional attachment in an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, DOI:10.1080/10494820.2014.917110.
  57. The China Post (2014). More Taiwanese use Facebook per capita than anywhere else in world. Retrieved This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Linking Learning Styles and Learning on Mobile Facebook Chen from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/business/2014/03/01/401737/MoreTaiwanese.htm
  58. Veletsianos, G. & Navarrete, C.C. (2012). Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 144-166.
  59. Wang, S.L. & Wu, P.Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers& Education, 51(4), 1589–1598.
  60. Wang, K.H., Wang, T.H., Wang, W.L., & Huang, S.C. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: Enhancing student achievement in web-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 207–217.
  61. Yi, M.Y., & Davis, F.D. (2003). Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 146-169.
  62. Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links