Fair and Equitable Measurement of Student Learning in MOOCS: An Introduction to Item Response Theory, Scale Linking, and Score Equating
Research & Practice in Assessment Volume 8,
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are playing an increasingly important role in higher education around the world, but despite their popularity, the measurement of student learning in these courses is hampered by cheating and other problems that lead to unfair evaluation of student learning. In this paper, we describe a framework for maintaining test security and preventing one form of cheating in online assessments. We also introduce readers to item response theory, scale linking, and score equating to demonstrate the way these methods can produce fair and equitable test scores. Patrick Meyer is an Assistant Professor in the Curry School of Education at the University of Virginia. He is the inventor of jMetrik, an open source psychometric software program. Shi Zhu is a doctoral student in the Research, Statistics, and Evaluation program in the Curry School of Education. He holds a Ph.D. in History from Nanjing University in China.
Meyer, J.P. & Zhu, S. (2013). Fair and Equitable Measurement of Student Learning in MOOCS: An Introduction to Item Response Theory, Scale Linking, and Score Equating. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 26-39.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Ali Alkazimi, Florida Atlantic University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2018 (Mar 26, 2018) pp. 87–93
Yong Chen & Wu He, Old Dominion University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 14, No. 5 (Oct 31, 2013)
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.