You are here:

Teachers' Perspective on Using Technology as an Instructional Tool
ARTICLE

, ,

Research in Higher Education Journal Volume 24,

Full Text

Abstract

Federal mandates require technology use in the classroom, but not all English language arts (ELA) teachers have implemented technology as an integral part of teaching. The purpose of this qualitative case study was to investigate why ELA teachers in 2 local high schools rarely or never use technology as an instructional tool. The study was supported by theories of constructivism, multiple intelligences, and problem-based learning. The guiding research questions sought to explore teachers' perspectives regarding integrating technology within the ELA curriculum. Qualitative data were collected via face-to-face interviews, field notes from classroom visits, and unobtrusive documents which included lesson plans and check-out logs for equipment from 8 participants. Open coding was used as themes emerged during the data analysis. A qualitative typological analysis was used to analyze individual cases, and a cross-case analysis clustered themes from participants' interview responses. Findings suggested teachers' limited use of technology resulted from inadequate access to equipment, inability to troubleshoot minor technology problems, and the absence of training in learning activities. The project included professional development training sessions focused on technology use as a teaching tool. Recommendations include initiating opportunities for teachers to demonstrate proficiency in embedding technology as a pivotal teaching strategy in all disciplines. By providing effective technology training and embedding technology in instruction, students may be better prepared to compete in the technological society of the 21st century and global workforce.

Citation

Davidson, L.Y.J., Richardson, M. & Jones, D. (2014). Teachers' Perspective on Using Technology as an Instructional Tool. Research in Higher Education Journal, 24,. Retrieved January 30, 2023 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on November 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Cauley, F., Aiken, K., & Whitney, L. (2010). Technologies across our curriculum: A study of technology integration in the classroom. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 114-118. Retrieved from ERIC.
  2. Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  3. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  4. Davies, R. (2011). Understanding technology literacy: A framework for evaluating educational technology integration. TechTrends, 55(5), 45-52.
  5. Gaytan, J. & McEwen, B. (2010). Instructional technology professional development evaluation: Developing a high quality model. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 52(2), 77-94. Retrieved from ERIC.
  6. Groff, J. & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACe Journal, 16(1), 21-46. Retrieved from ERIC.
  7. Hatch, J. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  8. Ikpeze, C. (2009). Integrating technology in one literacy course: Lessons learned. Journal of Literacy and Technology, (10)1, 3-39. Retrieved from ERIC.
  9. Janesick, V. (2004). Stretching exercises for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  10. Jones, A. & Vincent, J. (2010). Collegial mentoring for effective whole school professional development in the use of IWB technologies. Australasian Journal of Research in Higher Education Journal Volume 24 – August, 2014 Educational Technology, 26(4), 477-493. Retrieved from ERIC.
  11. Kemker, K, Barron, A., & Harmes, J. (2007). Laptop computers in the elementary classroom: Authentic instruction with at-risk students. Educational Media International, 44(4), 305-321. Doi:10.1080/09523980701680888
  12. Kingsley, K. (2007). Empower diverse learners with educational technology and digital Media. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43(1), 52-56. Retrieved from ERIC.
  13. Lombardi, M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. The EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, 1-10. Is this a chapter in an edited book? www.educause.edu/ELI/AuthenticLearningforthe21stCentury/156769 Retrieved from ERIC.
  14. Lu, R., & Overbaugh, R. (2008). The impact of a NCLB-EETT funded professional development program on teacher self-efficacy and resultant implementation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, (41)1, 43-61.
  15. Moore-Hart, M. (2008). Supporting teachers in their integration of technology literacy. Reading Horizons 48(3), 177-200. Retrieved from ERIC. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (2002). Public Law 107-110. Department of State and Federal Student Initiatives. Texas Education Agency.
  16. Overbay, A., Patterson, A., Vasu, E., & Grable, L. (2010). Constructivism and technology use: Findings form the IMPACTing leadership project. Educational Media International, 47(2), 103-120. Doi:10.1080/09523987.2010.492675
  17. Swan, K., Hooft, M. & Kratcoski, A. (2005). Uses and effects of mobile computing devices in k-8 classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(1), 99-112. Retrieved from ERIC.
  18. Texas Education Agency (2006). Long-range plan for technology, 2006-2010. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/technology/etac
  19. Texas Education Agency (2010). Progress Report on the Long-Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2010. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=5082 & Menu
  20. Texas Education Agency (2011). School technology and readiness: STaR chart report. Retrieved from http://starchart2.epsilen.com/ U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. National Education Technology Plan 2010, Executive Summary. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010
  21. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  22. Zhao, Y. (2007). Social studies teachers’ perspectives of technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 311-333.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links