You are here:

Different Storyboarding Methods in Multimedia Courseware Design
PROCEEDINGS

, Towson University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, ISBN 978-1-880094-37-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

When we use multimedia-authoring tools, such as ToolBook, or Hyperstudio, to develop courseware or course segment, we usually go through the major phases of systems development. One of the phases is systems design, in which output, inputs, and navigation are determined and blueprinted, which, technically, are detailed in storyboards. Traditionally, storyboards can be 5 by 7 index cards, or certain paper forms. The current paper will present another means of storyboarding—using PowerPoint as a storyboarding tool. The components and procedures of storyboarding will be introduced. In six undergraduate and four graduate teacher-education technology classes, students designed multimedia courseware using HyperStudio/ToolBook with three different storyboarding methods—index cards, paper forms, and PowerPoint. The evaluation scores on four criteria—screen display, interaction possibilities, orientation and navigation—were compared. Repeated measures were used for data analysis. Differences were found among the groups with different storyboarding methods.

Citation

Liu, L. (2000). Different Storyboarding Methods in Multimedia Courseware Design. In D. Willis, J. Price & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2000--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 784-789). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 24, 2019 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References