Grade Performance of Face-to-Face versus Online Agricultural Economics Students
Gina A. Greenway, Larry D. Makus
Natural Sciences Education Volume 43, Number 1, ISSN 2168-8281
Online course offerings have been growing at a rapid pace in post-secondary education. An ordered probit model is estimated to analyze the effects of online vs. face-to-face course format in achieving specific letter grades. An upper-division agricultural economics course taught over 9 years using both formats is used for the analysis. For a sample of 81 students, variables of grade point average, number of credit hours taken, verbal SAT score, gender, course format, and major were used to predict final score in the course. Results indicate that online students performed better than face-to-face students at a marginal significance level. Online students were 2% less likely to earn a D in the course, and 15% less likely to earn a C in the course than their face-to-face counterparts. Online students were 8% more likely to earn a B in the course and 9% more likely to earn an A in the course than face-to-face students.
Greenway, G.A. & Makus, L.D. (2014). Grade Performance of Face-to-Face versus Online Agricultural Economics Students. Natural Sciences Education, 43(1), 57-63. Retrieved March 27, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/154556/.
ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.
Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.
- academic achievement
- Advanced Courses
- agricultural education
- College Credits
- College Entrance Examinations
- College Students
- Comparative Analysis
- Conventional Instruction
- Economics Education
- gender differences
- Grade Point Average
- Grades (Scholastic)
- Majors (Students)
- online courses
- Predictor Variables
- Statistical Analysis