You are here:

Unpacking MOOC Scholarly Discourse: A Review of Nascent MOOC Scholarship ARTICLE

,

Learning, Media and Technology Volume 39, Number 3, ISSN 1743-9884

Abstract

The rapid rise of MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) signals a shift in the ways in which digital teaching and learning are engaged in and understood. Drawing upon a comprehensive search of nine leading academic databases, this paper examines the initial phase of MOOC scholarship (2009-2013), and offers an analysis of these empirical studies that conceptualizes themes in MOOC scholarship and locates them within a chronological framework. Two key phases of scholarship about MOOCs are identified, each with associated research imperatives and themes. Phase One: Connectivist MOOCs, Engagement and Creativity 2009-2011/2012. Themes of Phase One include: development of Connectivism as a learning theory, and technological experimentation and innovation in early cMOOCs. Phase Two: xMOOCs, Learning Analytics, Assessment, and Critical Discourses about MOOCs 2012-2013. Themes of Phase Two include: the rise of xMOOCs, further development of MOOC pedagogy and platforms, growth of learning analytics and assessment, and the emergence of a critical discourse about MOOCs.

Citation

Ebben, M. & Murphy, J.S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC Scholarly Discourse: A Review of Nascent MOOC Scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 328-345. Retrieved September 24, 2018 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on November 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Teaching Massive, Open, Online, Courses (MOOCs): Tales from the Front Line

    Patrick Lowenthal, Chareen Snelson & Ross Perkins, Boise State University

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 19, No. 3 (Jul 11, 2018)

  2. Explanations and Interactives Improve Subjective Experiences in Online Courseware

    Marshall Thomas, Harvard Medical School; Selen Trkay, Harvard University; Michael Parker, Harvard Medical School

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 18, No. 7 (Nov 29, 2017)

  3. Learning from decades of online distance education: MOOCs and the Community of Inquiry framework

    Dodzi Amemado & Stefania Manca

    Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Vol. 13, No. 2 (May 29, 2017)

  4. Graded and non-graded assessment tasks in MOOCs

    Paula Hodgson, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2017 (Jun 20, 2017) pp. 946–951

  5. A Systematic Analysis and Synthesis of the Empirical MOOC Literature Published in 2013–2015

    George Veletsianos, Royal Roads University; Peter Shepherdson

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 2 (Mar 01, 2016)

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.