You are here:

The Effect of an Augmented Reality Enhanced Mathematics Lesson on Student Achievement and Motivation
ARTICLE

, , Iowa State University

Journal of STEM Education Volume 16, Number 3, ISSN 1557-5284 Publisher: Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE)

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess student achievement and motivation during a high school augmented reality mathematics activity focused on dimensional analysis. Included in this article is a review of the literature on the use of augmented reality in mathematics and the combination of print with augmented reality, also known as interactive print. The design and development process of the interactive print document is described in detail. Participants in the quasi-experimental study included 61 students and measures included the IMMS Survey as well as pre, post, and delay post achievement tests. Findings support claims that technology use within a mathematics lesson increases student achievement and augmented reality enhances student motivation to learn mathematics. However, analyzing technologies impact on student conceptual or technical use of mathematics shows variance of degree emphasizing the need for continued exploration to determine technologies impact not only on overall mathematical achievement but also on the specific type of mathematical activity, technical or conceptual.

Citation

Estapa, A. & Nadolny, L. (2015). The Effect of an Augmented Reality Enhanced Mathematics Lesson on Student Achievement and Motivation. Journal of STEM Education, 16(3),. Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE). Retrieved October 4, 2023 from .

© 2015 Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface. Computers& Graphics, 25(5), 745-753.
  2. Bonnard, Q., Verma, H., Kaplan, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2012). Paper interfaces for learning geometry. In 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills (pp. 37-50). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  3. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
  4. Bujak, K.R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers& Education, 68, 536-544.
  5. Chen, N.S., Teng, D.C.E., & Lee, C.H. (2011). Augmenting paper-based reading activity with direct access to digital materials and scaffolded questioning. Computers& Education, 57(2), 1705-1715.
  6. Cheung, A.C., & Slavin, R.E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A metanalysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88113.
  7. Di Serio, A., Ibáñez, M.B., & Kloos, C.D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers& Education, 68, 586-596.
  8. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.
  9. Dünser, A., Walker, L., Horner, H., & Bentall, D. (2012, November). Creating interactive physics education books with augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (pp. 107-114). ACM.
  10. Greeno, J.G. (1997). On Claims That Answer the Wrong Questions. Educational Researcher, 26, 5-17.
  11. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T.P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K.C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., Human, P., Olivier, A, Human, P. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning
  12. Keller, J.M. (1987). IMMS: Instructional materials motivation survey. Florida State University.
  13. Keller, J.M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer.
  14. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Lee, H.S., & Lee, J.W. (2008). Mathematical education game based on augmented reality. In Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment(pp. 442450).
  16. Putnam, R.T., & Borko, H. (2000). What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say about Research on Teacher Learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15.
  17. Purcell, K., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). How teachers are using technology at home and in their classrooms. Washington, DC: Pew Research
  18. Sollervall, H. (2012). Collaboratie mathematical inquiry with augmented reality. Research and Practices in Technology Enhanced Learning, 7, 153-173.
  19. Wu, H.K., Lee, S.W.Y., Chang, H.Y., & Liang, J.C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers& Education, 62, 41-49.
  20. Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers& Education, 68, 570-585.
  21. Zbiek, R.M., Heid, M.K., Blume, G.W., & Dick, T.P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education. In Lester, F.K. (Ed), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (pp. 1169 –

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

Also Read

Related Collections