A Case Study of Scholars’ Open and Sharing Practices ARTICLE
George Veletsianos, Royal Roads University
Open Praxis Volume 7, Number 3, ISSN 1369-9997 e-ISSN 1369-9997 Publisher: International Council for Open and Distance Education
Although the open scholarship movement has successfully captured the attention and interest of higher education stakeholders, researchers currently lack an understanding of the degree to which open scholarship is enacted in institutions that lack institutional support for openness. I help fill this gap in the literature by presenting a descriptive case study that illustrates the variety of open and sharing practices enacted by faculty members at a North American university. Open and sharing practices enacted at this institution revolve around publishing manuscripts in open ways, participating on social media, creating and using open educational resources, and engaging with open teaching. This examination finds that certain open practices are favored over others. Results also show that even though faculty members often share scholarly materials online for free, they frequently do so without associated open licenses (i.e. without engaging in open practices). These findings suggest that individual motivators may significantly affect the practice of openness, but that environmental factors (e.g., institutional contexts) and technological elements (e.g., YouTube’s default settings) may also shape open practices in unanticipated ways.
Veletsianos, G. (2015). A Case Study of Scholars’ Open and Sharing Practices. Open Praxis, 7(3), 199-209. International Council for Open and Distance Education. Retrieved October 22, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/151725/.
- Allen, I. & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/Openingthecurriculum2014.pdf
- Anderson, T. & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.
- Brown, J., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–41. http://oerresearchhub.org/about-2/reports
- Deimann, M. & Farrow, R. (2013). Rethinking OER and their use: Open education as Bildung. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 14(3), 344–360.
- Dutton, W. (2013) The social shaping of digital research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), 177–195. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.774171Ehlers,U.-D.(2011).Extendingthe territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1–10. Retrieved from http://journals.akoaotearoa.ac.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/view/64
- Eich, E. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25(1), 3–6.
- Esposito, A. (2013). Neither digital or open. Just researchers. Views on digital/open scholarship practices in an Italian university. First Monday, 18(1). Http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.3881Eysenbach,G.(2006).Citationadvantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e157.
- Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T. & Harnad, S. (2010). Selfselected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636.
- Hayden, E.C. (2011, August 9). Open research casts doubt on arsenic life. Nature News. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1137/2130
- Hutchings, P. & Shulman, L. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: new elaborations, new developments. Change, 31(5), 10–15.
- Kesan, J.P. & Shah, R.C. (2006). Setting software defaults: Perspectives from law, computer science and behavioral economics. Notre Dame Law Review, 82(2), 583–634.
- Knox, J. (2013). The limitations of access alone: moving towards open processes in education technology. Open Praxis, 5(1), 21–29. Http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.36Iiyoshi,T.& Kumar, M.V. (2008). Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- 208George VeletsianosMemorandum Of Understanding (2014). Memorandum of Understanding on Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from http://www.gov.sk.ca/adx/aspx/adxGetMedia.aspx?mediaId=f3d342c4ab61-44a4-9f96-71ceb7810a5d & PN=Shared
- Mulder, F. (2013). The logic of national policies and strategies for open educational resources. The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 14(2), 96–105. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1536/2505 Murphy, A. (2013). Open educational practices in higher education: institutional adoption and challenges. Distance Education, 34(2), 201–217. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.793
- 641Nature Publishing Group. (2013). Reporting Checklist For Life Sciences Articles. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/checklist.pdf NSERC (2014). Draft Tri-Agency Open Access Policy. Retrieved on May 5, 2014 from http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/NSERC-CRSNG/policies-politiques/Tri-OA-Policy-Politique-LATrois_eng.asp
- Nikoi, S. & Armellini, A. (2012). The OER mix in higher education: purpose, process, product, and policy. Distance Education, 33(2), 165–184. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.697439Oliver,M.(2013).Learningtechnology: Theorising the tools we study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 31–43. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8535.2011.01283.x
- Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.
- Tuomi, I. (2013). Open Educational Resources and the Transformation of Education. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 58–78. Http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12019
- 209UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of opencourseware for higher education in developing countries: Final report. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001285/128515e.pdf
- Vincent-Lamarre, P., Boivin, J., Gargouri, Y., Larivière, V. & Harnad, S. (2014). Estimating Open Access Mandate Effectiveness: I. The MELIBEA Score. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1410.2926.
- Weller, M. (2014). Battle for Open: How openness won and why it doesn’t feel like victory. London, UK: Ubiquity Press. Http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bamWillinsky,J.(2006).Theaccess principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Yuan, L., MacNeill, S. & Kraan, W. (2008). Open educational resources–Opportunities and challenges for higher education. Center for Educational Technology, Interoperability and Standards (CETIS) briefing paper. Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/OER_Briefing_Paper_CETIS.pdf
- Zawacki-Richter, O., Anderson, T. & Tuncay, N. (2010). The growing impact of open access distance education journals: a bibliometric analysis. The Journal of Distance Education/Revue De L’Éducation à Distance, 24(3). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/ View/661/1210
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.
Christine Greenhow, Holly Marich & K. Bret Staudt Willet, Michigan State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 856–861
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.