You are here:

Online tutoring procedure for research project supervision: management, organization and key elements

, , University of the Balearic Islands, Department of Applied Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, Spain

NAERJ Volume 4, Number 2, ISSN 2254-7339 Publisher: University of Alicante


Research project tutoring appears as a crucial element for teaching; it is a planned action based on the relationship between a tutor and a student. This paper presents the findings of a design and development research which has as its main aim to create an organization system for the tutoring of online research projects. That system seeks to facilitate the tutoring and supervision task with trainee researchers, providing guidance for its management and instruments for its implementation. The main conclusions arising from this research derive from considering the need to offer a solution to the problem of distance research project supervision and has materialized in organization and sequencing through a model about the variables that influence the research project tutoring problem.


Dardes Mesquida, A. & Pérez, A. (2015). Online tutoring procedure for research project supervision: management, organization and key elements. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 4(2), 123-132. University of Alicante. Retrieved February 18, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Amundsen, C., & McAlpine, L. (2009). “Learning supervision”: trial by fire. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 331-342.
  2. Blass, E., Jasman, A., & Levy, R. (2012). Supervisor reflections on developing doctoralness in practice-based doctoral students. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 31-41.
  3. Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1988). Effective Teaching in Higher Education. London: Methuen.
  4. Correa, J.M., & De Pablos, J. (2009). Nuevas Tecnologías e Innovación Educativa. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 14(1), 133-145. r, A., Pérez, A., & Salinas, J. (2012). El mapa conceptual como instrumento de investigación: construcción y representación de un modelo de tutoría virtual. In A.J. Cañas, J.D. Novak, & J. Vanhear (Eds.), CMC2012. Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Concept Mapping. (pp. 180–187). Malta. Retrieved from
  5. DelaCruz, J. (2009). En busca de hábitos científicos: La tutoría en un doctorado en educación. In X Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa (pp. 1-11).
  6. Gardner, S.K. (2009). The Development of Doctoral Students: Phases of Challenge and Support. ASHE Higher Education Report, 34(6), 1-127.
  7. Holley, K.A., & Lee, M. (2012). The challenges of designing and implementing a doctoral student mentoring program. Innovative Higher Education, 37(3), 243253.
  8. Lee, A.M. (2007). Developing effective supervisors: concepts of research supervision. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(4), 680-693. Retrieved from
  9. Lee, A.M. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267-281.
  10. Lee, A., & Green, B. (2009). Supervision as metaphor. Studies in Higher Education, 34(6), 615-630.
  11. Mainhard, T., vander Rijst, R., van Tartwijk, J., & Wubbels, T. (2009). A model for the supervisor-doctoral student relationship. Higher Education, 58(3), 359373.
  12. McKenney, S., & Visscher-Voerman, I. (2013). Formal education of curriculum and instructional designers. Educational Designer. Journal of the International Society for Design and Development in Education, 2(6). Retrieved from
  13. Overall, N.C., Deane, K.L., & Peterson, E.R. (2011). Higher Education Research& Development Promoting doctoral students’ research self-efficacy: combining academic guidance with autonomy support. Higher Education Research& Development, 30(6), 791-805.
  14. Sánchez, C., & Castellanos, A. (2013). Las competencias profesionales del tutor virtual ante las tecnologias eme rgentes de la sociedad del conocimiento. EDUTEC. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 44. Retrieved from DASHDASH
  15. Shacham, M., & Od-Cohen, Y. (2009). Rethinking PhD learning incorporating communities of practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 279-292.
  16. Strang, K.D. (2009). Measuring online learning approach and mentoring preferences of international doctorate students. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(4), 245-257. Doi:10.1016/J.ijeR.2009.11.002131
  17. Tapia, E., Rivera, E., & Piantzi, L. (2013). Estudio exploratorio de creencias acerca de la redacción y supervisión de tesis. RIDE. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 10. Retrieved from
  18. Tejedor, F.J., García-Valcárcel, A., & Prada, S. (2009). Medida de act itudes del profesorado universitario hacia la integración de las TIC. Comunicar, 33(XVII), 115-124.
  19. Van den Akker, J. (2013). Curricular Development Research as Specimen of Educational Design Research. In T. Plomp& N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research (pp. 53-70). Enschede the Netherlands: SLO. Netherlands institute

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact