You are here:

Prevailing Lexical-stylistic Features in Emirati Language Learners’ Digital Discourse | Caractéristiques lexicales stylistiques dominantes dans le discours numérique des apprenants en langue émirienne ARTICLE

CJLT Volume 41, Number 2, ISSN 1499-6677 e-ISSN 1499-6677 Publisher: Canadian Network for Innovation in Education


Predicting the future path of the digital classroom discourse is twofold. Today’s language classroom is undergoing an irreversible revolution and one of the most powerful drivers of this transformation is ICT. Digital classroom not only exposes the learners to grammatical language of linguistics, but rather the everyday life of the language in use (Thurlow and Mroczek, 2011). The aim of this study was to explore the nature of free digital discourse in a digital language classroom and capture lexical-stylistic features used in students’ online conversations through Blackboard-learn discussion board. To identify common or unique features of digital discourse in a paperless language classroom and to show how they affect students’ speech behaviors, mixed method case study was used. Aujourd’hui, l’enseignement des langues est entraîné dans une hyperbole irréversible, et les TIC sont l’un des moteurs les plus puissants de cette transformation. Les salles de classe numériques exposent les apprenants non seulement à la grammaire linguistique, mais aussi à la vie quotidienne de la langue en usage (Thurlow et Mroczek, 2011). Le but de cette étude était d’explorer la nature du discours numérique gratuit sur iPad dans une salle de classe numérique pour l’apprentissage linguistique et de capter les caractéristiques lexicales stylistiques utilisées dans les communications en ligne des apprenants adolescents en langue émirienne. Cette approche mixte par étude de cas a mis en œuvre un cadre théorique de détection des sentiments sur une plateforme d’apprentissage sur tableau noir pour cerner les caractéristiques communes ou uniques du discours numérique dans une salle de classe dématérialisée et démontrer comment elles affectent les comportements linguistiques des élèves de langue maternelle émirienne.


Grigoryan, T. (2015). Prevailing Lexical-stylistic Features in Emirati Language Learners’ Digital Discourse | Caractéristiques lexicales stylistiques dominantes dans le discours numérique des apprenants en langue émirienne. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 41(2),. Canadian Network for Innovation in Education. Retrieved October 22, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Adesanmi, T. (2012). Linguistic creativity in computer-mediated communication: Examples from selected African chats. In R. Taiwo & I. Chiluwa (Eds.), Computer-mediated discourse in Africa (pp. 141-156). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
  2. Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  3. Butler, C. (1985). Computers in linguistics. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell Inc.
  4. Cazden, C.B. (2001). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  5. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2001). Research methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  6. Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. London, England: Oxford University Press.
  7. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Hong Kong, China: Polity Press.
  8. Garrison A., Remley D., Thomas P. & Wierzewski E. (2011). Conventional faces: Emoticons in instant messaging discourse. Computers and Composition, 28(1), 112-125.
  9. Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  10. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York, NY: Routledge.
  11. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London, England: Sage Publications.
  12. Marsh, J. & Millard, E. (2000). Literacy and popular culture. London, England: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
  13. Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implement. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley& Sons.
  14. Monaco, J. (2000). How to read a film: The world of movies, media, and multimedia. London, England: Oxford University Press.
  15. Murthy, D. (2013). Twitter: Social communication in the digital age. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
  16. O'Connell, T., Grantham, J., Wong, W., Workman, K., & Wang, A. (2010). Dint u say that: Digital discourse, digital natives and gameplay. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 3(1), 1-35. Retrieved from
  17. Palfrey, J. & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital. Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  18. Prensky, M. (2012). From digital natives to digital wisdom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  19. Rosenthal, S. & McKeown, K. (2013). Sentiment detection of subjective phrases in social media. Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, 2(7), 478–482.
  20. Schmied, J. (2012). Social digital discourse: New challenges for corpus and sociolinguistics. Topics in Linguistics, 10, 43-56. Retrieved from
  21. Taiwo, R. (2012). Discursive forms and functions of flaming in Nigerian online forums. In R. Taiwo & I. Chiluwa (Eds.), Computer-mediated discourse in Africa (pp. 87-102).
  22. Thomas, M. (2011). Deconstructing digital natives. Young people, technology and the new literacies. New York, NY: Routledge.
  23. Thurlow, C. (2004). Computer mediated communication social interaction and the Internet. London, England: Sage Publications.
  24. Thurlow, C. & Mroczek, K. (2011). Digital discourse. Language in the new media. London, England: Oxford University Press.
  25. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Washington, DC: Sage Publications.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact

Also Read

Related Collections