You are here:

Scenario-Based Approach for Teaching Parental Involvement to Preservice Teachers
PROCEEDINGS

, USF St.Petersburg, United States ; , , Georgia Southern University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Many preservice teachers find the theories and concepts they learn in university classrooms too abstract to help address parental involvement issues they encounter in schools. This study describes the use of a technology-based case/scenario approach to preparation of preservice and inservice teachers for dealing with parents.

Citation

Unal, Z., Unal, A. & Bodur, Y. (2015). Scenario-Based Approach for Teaching Parental Involvement to Preservice Teachers. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2614-2621). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 4, 2023 from .

© 2015 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Ames, C. (1995), Teachers' School-to-Home Communications and Parental Involvement: The Role of Parent Perceptions and Beliefs (Report No. 28), East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, College of Education, Centre on Families, Communities, Schools and Children's Learning.
  2. Bauch, J.P. (1989). The Transparent School Model: New Technology for parental involvement. Educational Leadership, 32-34.
  3. Bloomfield L. And Magney, A. (2009). Does Facilitator Expertise Matter? A Perspective from Scenario-Based Learning Question. Focus on Health Professional Education: A multi-disciplinary Journal 10(3), 12.
  4. Chavkin, N.F., & Williams, D.L. (1988). Critical issues in the teaching training for parent involvement. Educational Horizons, 66, 87-89.
  5. Chi, M.T., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R.J. Stemberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. De Kanter, A., Ginsberg, A.L., & Milne, A.M. (1987). Parent involvement strategies: A new emphasis on traditional parent roles. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  7. Epstein, J. & Dauber, S. (1991). School programs and teacher practices of parent involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. Elementary School Journal, 91, 291-305.
  8. Foster, J., & Loven, R. (1992). The need and direction for parent involvement in the 90s: Undergraduate perspectives and expectations. Action in Teacher Education. 14(3), 13-18.
  9. Hancock, R. (1998). Building Home School Liaison into Classroom Practice: a need to understand the nature of a teacher’s working day. British Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 379-381.
  10. Harrington, H.L., Quinn-Leering, K. & Hodson, L. (1996). Written Case Analyses and Critical Reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12 (1), 25-37.
  11. Henderson, A.T., & Berla, N. (1994). A new generation of evidence: The family is critical to student achievement. Washington, DC: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
  12. Jonassen, D.H. (2004). Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide. Pfeiffer, CA: John Wiley& Sons Inc.
  13. Keith, T.Z., & Keith, P.B. (1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement? Structural analysis of national data. School Psychology Review, 22 (3), 474-496.
  14. Lazar, A. & Slostad, F. (1999). How to overcome obstacles to parent-teacher partnerships. ClearingHouse, 72(4), 206-210.
  15. Lazar, A., Broderick, P., Mastrilli, T., & Slostad, F. (1999). Educating teachers for parent involvement, Contemporary Education, 70(3), 5-10.
  16. Liontos, L.B. (1992). At-risk families and schools becoming partners. Eugene: University of Oregon, ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
  17. McQueen, C.D. (2002). Preservice teachers' beliefs about and experiences with parents and parent involvement. The University of Texas at Austin.
  18. Meacham, J.A., & Emont, N.M. (1989). The interpersonal basis of everyday problem solving. In J.D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications. New York, NY: Praeger.
  19. Merseth, K.K. (1991). Case studies and teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 17(1), 53-62.
  20. Merseth, K.K. (1990). The early history of case-based instruction: Insights for teacher education today. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 2433-2439.
  21. Midkiff, R., & Lawler-Prince, D. (1992). Preparing tomorrow's teachers: Meeting the challenge of diverse family structures. Action in Teacher Education, 14(3), 1-5
  22. Shin, N., Jonassen, H.D., & McGee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (1), 7-27.
  23. Stevenson, D.L., & Baker, E.P. (1987). The family-school relation and the child’s school performance. Child Development, 58, 1348-1357.
  24. Taylor, S. (1999). Technology as a tool to increase parent involvement in education. Retrieved from: http://www.amicusforchildren.org/papers.htm
  25. Tichenor, M.S. (1997). Teacher education and parent involvement: Reflections from Pre-service teachers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24(4), 233-239.
  26. Tunny, T, Papinczak, T. And Young, L. (2010). Student perceptions of PBL tutor performance: A longitudinal cohort study, Focus on Health Professional Education: A multi-disciplinary journal. 11(3), 74–84.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections