You are here:

Elderly People Using Tablets: Unexpected Issues Highlighted in an Intergenerational Activity PROCEEDINGS

, University of Paris-Nord Labex ICCA, France ; , Sorbonne-Nouvelle University Paris 3, France

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


According to many studies, older people may have low self-efficacy and high technology anxiety. The authors have conducted several workshops in order to study intergenerational cooperation in the use of touch tablets to design and play a video game. Beyond physical and mental deteriorations, these activities have highlighted unexpected difficulties based on implicit knowledge differences between children and the elderly. The purpose of this article is to make explicit some of these differences. In this way, these differences may be avoided more easily in future attempts to develop the use of high technology devices by elderly adults.


Hock-Koon, S. & Mansilla, J.C. (2015). Elderly People Using Tablets: Unexpected Issues Highlighted in an Intergenerational Activity. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1092-1097). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 13, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Bonder, B., & Wagner, M. (2001). Functional Performance in Older Adults. F.A. Davis Company.
  2. Chung, J.E., Park, N., Wang, H., Fulk, J., & McLaughlin, M. (2010). Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1674–1684.
  3. Czaja, S.J., Charness, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S.N., Rogers, W.A., & Sharit, J. (2006). Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings From the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352.
  4. Gee, J.P. (2003). What VideoGames Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin. Hock-Koon, S. (2012a). Affordances of Elliptical Learning in Arcade VideoGames. In Proceedings of DiGRA Nordic 2012 Conference. Tampere, Finlande. Retrieved from Hock-Koon, S. (2012b). Learning in Arcade VideoGames: Elliptical Mechanisms and Transferability to Education. In Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Vol. 2012, pp. 2542–
  6. Mansilla, J.C.F. (2012). Le Cinedit-Les Mercredis de Chaplin. Retrieved from V=AOrOo1v1ilg&feature=youtube_gdata_player
  7. Mcgrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. PROCEEDINGS OF GRAPHICS INTERFACE 2000, 179–186.
  8. Norman, D. (2011). Affordances and Design. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from
  9. O’Brien, M.A., Rogers, W.A., & Fisk, A.D. (2012). Understanding Age and Technology Experience Differences in Use of Prior Knowledge for Everyday Technology Interactions. ACM Trans. Access. Comput., 4(2), 9:1–9:27.
  10. Small, G., & Vorgan, G. (2008). IBrain: Surviving the Technological Alteration of the Modern Mind. New York: William Morrow.
  11. Van Eck, R. (2006). Using games to promote girls’ positive attitudes toward technology. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 2(3). Retrieved from

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact