The Effect of Educational Networking on Students’ Performance in Biology
Chee Nee, University of Malaya, Malaysia
TCC, ISSN 1937-1659 Publisher: TCCHawaii
Nee, C. (2014). The Effect of Educational Networking on Students’ Performance in Biology. In Proceedings of TCC 2014 (pp. 73-97). TCCHawaii. Retrieved January 16, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/149830/.
© 2014 TCCHawaii
- Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 7180.
- Annetta L.A., Minogue J., Holmes S.Y. & Cheng M.T. (2009) Investigating the impact of videogames on high school students’ engagement and learning about genetics. Computers& Education 53, 74–85.
- Astin A. (1984) Student involvement: a developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel 25, 297–308.
- Bahar, M., Johnstone, A.H., & Hansell, M.H. (1999). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), 84–86.
- Blaikie, N. (2003). Analyzing quantitative data: From description to explanation. Thousand Oaks: CA: SAGE Publishers Ltd.
- Boogart V, Robert M (2006). Uncovering the social impacts of “Facebook” on a college campus. Master’s thesis, Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology, Kansas State Uniyersity.
- Cepni S, Tas E, Kose S (2006). The effects of computer-assisted material on students’ cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Comp. Edu. 46(2): 192-205.
- Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.
- Chinnici, J.P., Yue, J.W. And Torres, K.M. (2004) Students as ‘human chromosomes’ in roleplaying mitosis and meiosis. Am. Biol. Teach. 66, 35–41
- Çimer A (2004). A study of Turkish biology teachers’ and students’ views of effective teaching in schools and teacher education. EdD Dissertation, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, U.K.
- Clark DC, Mathis PM (2000). Modeling mitosis and meiosis, a problem solving activity. The Am. Bio. Teach. 62(3): 204-206.
- Cordero RE, Szweczak CA (1994). The developmental importance of cell division. The Am. Bio. Teach. 56(3): 176-179.
- Corn, J., Pittendrigh, B.R., & Orvis, K.S. (2004). Genomics analogy model for educators (GAME): from jumping genes to alternative splicing. Journal of Biological Education, 39(1), 24-26.
- Creswell, J. (1994). Research design: Qualitative& Quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: CA, Sage Publications.
- Flores F, Tovar M, Gallegos L (2003). Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: An integrated view. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 25(2): 269-286.
- Hatcher, L. And Stepanski, E.J. (1994) A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System forUnivariate and Multivariate statistics (Cary, NC: SAS Institute).
- Hoffman, E. (2009). Evaluating social networking tools for distance learning. Presented at TCC 2009 Proceedings, Retrieved from http://etec.hawaii.edu/proceedings/2009/hoffman.pdf. Jonassen, D. (2000). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (volume ii): A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Kruger J., Epley N., Parker J. & Ng Z.-W. (2005) Egocentrism over e-email: can we communicate as well as we think? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 89, 925– 936.
- Law, N., & Lee, Y. (2004). Using an iconic modeling tool to support the learning of genetics concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 38(3), 118-141.
- Lawson, A.E., & Thompson, L.D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and biological misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 733–746.
- Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking websites and teens: an overview. Pew Internet and American life project. Retrieved 22.09.2013, from. Http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_SNS_Data_Memo_Jan_20 07.pdf.pdf
- Lewis J, Leach J, Robinson CW (2000) Chromosomes: the missing link-young people’s understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilization. J Biol Educ 34(4):189–199
- Lewis J. And Wood-Robinson C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance-do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22, 177-197.
- Lucking, R., & Manning, M.L. (1996). Instruction for low-achieving young adolescents: Addressing the challenge of a generation imperiled. Preventing School Failure, 40(2), 82–87.
- Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34, 200–210.
- Mason, R. (2006). ‘Learning technologies for adult continuing education’. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 121-133.
- Nkpa N (1997). Educational research for modern students. Enugu: Fourth Dimension.
- Novak JD, Canas A (2004). Building on new constructivist ideas and Cmaptools to create a new model for education. Proceedings of the First Int. Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain.
- Oztas H, Ozay E, Oztas F (2003). Teaching cell division to secondary school students: An investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish teachers. J. Bio. Edu. 38(1): 13-15.
- Pashley M (1994). A-level students: Their problems with gene an allele. J. Bio. Edu. 28(2): 120126.
- Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Richard, M. (1997). Selected attitudinal factors related to students’ success in high school. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 43(2–3), 165–168.
- Riemeier T, Gropengießer H (2008). On the roots of difficulties in learning about cell division: Process-based analysis of students’ conceptual development in teaching experiments. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 30(7): 923-939.
- Smith MU (1991). Teaching cell division: Student difficulties and teaching recommendations. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 21(1): 28-33.
- Smith MU, Kindfield ACH (1999). Teaching cell division: Basics and recommendations. The Am. Bio. Teach. 61(5): 366-371.
- Suter W.N. (1998). Primer of educational research. London: Allyn.
- Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Tekkaya C (2003). Remediating high schools’ misconceptions concerning diffusion and osmosis through concept mapping and conceptual change text. Res. Sci. Technol. Edu. 21(1): 516.
- Tsui, C.Y., & Treagust, D. (2003). Learning genetics with computer dragons. Journal of Biological Education, 37(2), 96-98.
- Wandersee JH, Mintzes JJ, Novak D (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan pp. 177-210.
- Wise, L., Skues, J., & Williams, B. (2011). Facebook in higher education promoted social but not academic agents. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown& B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011, 1332-1342.
- Yip DY (1998) Identification of misconceptions in naive biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology learning. Int J Sci Educ 20:461–477
- Zhao, C. & Kuh, G. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher education, 45(2), 115-138. Doi 0361-0365/04/0300-0115/0 97
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.