You are here:

Analytics to literacies: The development of a learning analytics framework for multiliteracies assessment
ARTICLE

, University of South Australia ; , University of Texas, Arlington

IRRODL Volume 15, Number 4, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

The rapid advances in information and communication technologies, coupled with increased access to information and the formation of global communities, have resulted in interest among researchers and academics to revise educational practice to move beyond traditional ‘literacy’ skills towards an enhanced set of “multiliteracies” or “new media literacies”. Measuring the literacy of a population, in the light of its linkage to individual and community wealth and wellbeing, is essential to determining the impact of compulsory education. The opportunity now is to develop tools to assess individual and societal attainment of these new literacies. Drawing on the work of Jenkins and colleagues (2006) and notions of a participatory culture, this paper proposes a conceptual framework for how learning analytics can assist in measuring individual achievement of multiliteracies and how this evaluative process can be scaled to provide an institutional perspective of the educational progress in fostering these fundamental skills.

Citation

Dawson, S. & Siemens, G. (2014). Analytics to literacies: The development of a learning analytics framework for multiliteracies assessment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(4),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved March 5, 2021 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies. Australia: Curriculum Press.
  2. Arnold, K.E. (2010). Signals: Applying academic analytics. EDUCAUSE Quarterly Magazine, 33(1). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMaga ZineVolum/SignalsApplyingAcademicAnalyti/199385
  3. Balfanz, R., Bridgeland, J.M., Moore, L.A., & Fox, J.H. (2010). Building a grad nation: Progress and challenge in ending the high school dropout epidemic. Retrieved from http://www.americaspromise.org/Our-Work/Grad-Nation/Building-aGrad-Nation.aspx.
  4. Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., & Means, B. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, 1-57.
  5. Biswas, G., Jeong, H., Kinnebrew, J., Sulcer, B., & Roscoe, R. (2010). Measuring selfregulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment. Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning (RPTEL), 5(2), 123-152.
  6. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151-167.
  7. Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
  8. Brown, I., Lockyer, L., & Caputi, P. (2010). Multiliteracies and assessment practice. In D.R. Cole& D.R. Pullen (Eds.), Multiliteracies in motion: Current theory and practice (pp. 191-206). New York: Routledge.
  9. Brown, J.S., & Adler, A.P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16-32.
  10. Buckingham Shum, S., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social learning analytics. Educational Technology& Society, 15(3), 3-26.
  11. Burt, R. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. The American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399.
  12. Campbell, J., DeBlois, P.B., & Oblinger, D. (2007). Academic analytics: A new tool for a new era. EDUCAUSE Review, 42(4), 42-57.
  13. Contractor, N.S., Monge, P.R., & Leonardi, P.M. (2011). Multidimensional networks and the dynamics of sociomateriality: Bringing technology inside the network. International Journal of Communication, 5, 682-720.
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2006). Foreward: Developing creativity. In N. Jackson, M. Oliver, M. Shaw& J. Wisdom (Eds.), Developing creativity in higher education: An imaginative curriculum (pp. Xviii-xx). London: Routledge.
  15. Dator, J. (2005). Universities without "quality" and quality without "universities". On the Horizon, 13(4), 199-215.
  16. Dawson, S. (2006). Relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 153162.
  17. Dawson, S. (2010). 'Seeing' the learning community: An exploration of the development of a resource for monitoring online student networking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 736–752.
  18. Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Joksimovic, S. (2014). Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (LAK '14), Indianapolis, USA. Vol 15 | No 4 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Sept./14 300
  19. De Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Magoulas, G., & Poulovassilis, A. (2010). Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 69-85.
  20. De Laat, M. (2002). Network and content analysis in an online community discourse. Paper presented at the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Boulder, Colorado.
  21. De Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R.J. (2006). Analysing student engagement with learning and tutoring activities in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 2(4), 394-412.
  22. De Liddo, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Quinto, I., Bachler, M., & Cannavacciuolo, L. (2011). Discourse-centric learning analytics. Paper presented at the
  23. Edwards, R. (1997). Changing places? Flexibility, lifelong learning and a learning society. London: Routledge.
  24. Fournier, H., Kop, R., & Sitlia, H. (2011). The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge Banff, Alberta, Canada.
  25. Fritz, J. (2011). Classroom walls that talk: Using online course activity data of successful students to raise self-awareness of underperforming peers. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 89-97.
  26. Garrison, D.R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18-33.
  27. Gee, J.P. (2009). Reflections on reading Cope and Kalantzis' "Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning". Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4, 196-204.
  28. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning spaces. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1130-1161.
  29. Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Building social networks via computer networks: Creating and sustaining distributed learning communities. In K.A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 159-190). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Haythornthwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-Learning theory and practice. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  31. Huijser, H. (2006). Refocusing multiliteracies for the net generation. International Journal of Pedagogies& Learning, 2(1), 22-34.
  32. Jackson, N. (2006). Imagining a different world. In N. Jackson, M. Oliver, M. Shaw& J. Wisdom (Eds.), Developing creativity in higher education: An imaginative curriculum. London: Routledge.
  33. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robinson, A.J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation.
  34. Judd, T., & Kennedy, G. (2011). Measurement and evidence of computer-based task switching and multitasking by ‘Net Generation’ students. Computers& Education, 56(3), 625-631. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2010.10.004
  35. Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., & Harvey, A. (2003). Assessing multiliteracies and the new basics. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy& Practice, 10(1), 15-26.
  36. Kalman, J. (2008). Beyond definition: Central concepts for understanding literacy. International Review of Education, 54(5/6), 532-538.
  37. Kennedy, G., & Judd, T. (2004). Making sense of audit trail data. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 18-32.
  38. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
  39. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge in the classroom. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Vol 15 | No 4 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Sept./14 302
  40. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  41. Leadbeater, C., & Wong, A. (2009). Learning from the extremes: Strategies for radical social innovation(http://www.cisco.com/web/about/citizenship/socioeconomic/docs/LearningfromExtremes_WhitePaper.pdf). Cisco.
  42. Literat, I. (2014). Measuring new media literacies: Towards the development of a comprehensive assessment tool. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 6(1), 1527.
  43. Lockyer, L., Heathcote, E., & Dawson, S. (2013). Informing pedagogical action: Aligning learning analytics with learning design. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1439-1459.
  44. Macfadyen, L., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers& Education, 54(2), 588599.
  45. Macfadyen, L., & Dawson, S. (2012). Numbers are not enough. Why e-Learning analytics failed to inform an institutional strategic plan. Educational Technology& Society, 15(3), 149-163.
  46. McKinsey Global Institute. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/Insights/MGI/Research/Technology_and_Innovati On/Big_data_The_next_frontier_for_innovation.
  47. McWilliam, E., & Dawson, S. (2008). Pedagogical practice after the Information Age. In S. Inayatullah, I. Milojevic & S. Bussey (Eds.), Alternative educational futures: Pedagogies for emergent worlds (Vol. 130-144). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  48. Ministry of Education. (1998). Learning to think, thinking to learn: Towards thinking schools, learning nation. Singapore: Ministry of Education. Moreno-Ger, Pablo, Burgos, Daniel, Martínez-Ortiz, Iván, Sierra, José Luis, & Fernández-Manjón, Baltasar. (2008). Educational game design for online education. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2530-2540.
  49. Norris, D., Baer, L., Leonard, J., Pugliese, L., & Lefrere, P. (2008). Action analytics: Measuring and improving performance that matters in higher education. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 42-67.
  50. Pardo, A., & Kloos, C.D. (2011). Stepping out of the box: Towards analytics outside the learning management system. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
  51. Pozzi, F., Manca, S., Persico, D., & Sarti, L. (2007). A general framework for tracking and analysing learning processes in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(2), 169-179.
  52. Rose, C., Wang, Y., Cui, Y., Arguella, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 237-272.
  53. Siemens, G. (2005). A learning theory for the digital age. Instructional Technology and Distance Education, 2(1), 3-10.
  54. Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics the emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380-1400.
  55. Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30-40.
  56. U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Washington, D.C.
  57. UNESCO Education Sector. (2004). The plurality of literacy and its implications for policies and programs: Position paper. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001362/136246e.pdf.
  58. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press. Vol 15 | No 4 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Sept./14 304
  59. Watson, J., & Gemin, B. (2008). Using online learning for at-risk students and credit recovery. Washington, DC: International Council for K-12 Online Learning.
  60. Winne, P.H., & Hadwin, A.F. (2013). NStudy: Tracing and supporting self-regulated learning in the Internet. In R. Azevedo& V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 293-308).

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links