You are here:

In Search of Localization Criteria for Learning Solutions: Examining the localization needs of Finnish learning solutions in the United Arab Emirates PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Jyväskylä, Finland ; , Zayed University, United Arab Emirates ; , the United Arab Emirates, United Arab Emirates

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Tampere, Finland ISBN 978-1-939797-08-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


Despite the acknowledged necessity for localizing learning solutions developed in one cultural context to satisfy the requirements of another, the question of how to achieve this in practice has remained elusive. Although some answers have been provided to illuminate technical localization processes, only in recent years more attention has been given to important educational and socio-cultural factors. In this paper, we will describe on-going research efforts related to creating a localization framework for defining country specific localization criteria. The preliminary framework was developed from a literature review and subsequently refined through international research collaboration. In addition to presenting the initial framework to be tested by examining learning solutions through expert evaluations, this paper discusses initial findings along with highlighting the potential localization needs identified when localizing Finnish learning solutions in the United Arab Emirates.


Mäkelä, T., Kankaanranta, M., Young, B. & Alshannag, Q. (2014). In Search of Localization Criteria for Learning Solutions: Examining the localization needs of Finnish learning solutions in the United Arab Emirates. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 2596-2603). Tampere, Finland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 17, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Aggarwal, A., & Makkonen, P. (2009). Critical success factors for successful globalized e-learning. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 6(1), (pp. 92– 109).
  2. Beni Laabassi, H. (2003). E-Learning globalization in multilingual and multicultural environment. Department Computer Engineering. Ecole Mohammadia del Ingénieur. Rabat, Morocco.
  3. Dagiene, V. & Zilinskiene, I. (2008). Localization of learning objects in mathematics. Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  4. Fisher, D.L. & Waldrip, B.G. (1999). Cultural Factors of Science Classroom Learning Environments, TeacherStudent Interactions and Student Outcomes, Research in Science& Technological Education, 17:1 (pp. 83-96).
  5. Finnish National Board of Education (2004). National core curriculum for basic education 2004. Vammala, Vammalan Kirjapaino oy.
  6. Henderson, L. (1996). Instructional Design of Interactive Multimedia: A cultural critique, Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(4), (pp. 85-104).
  7. Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural Differences in Teaching and Learning, International Journal of Intercultural Relations10 (pp. 301-320).
  8. Hofstede, G. (2014). Countries. Retrieved on 18.03.2014 from
  9. International Bureau of Education (2014). World Data on Education. UNESCO-IBE. Retrieved on 18.03.2014 from
  10. Kankaanranta, M. & Mäkelä, T. (2014). Valuation of Emerging Learning Solutions. Proceedings in World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (EdMedia) 2014, Tampere 23.-27.6.2014 (in press).
  11. Kersten, G.E., Kersten, M.A., & Rakowski, W.M. (2002). Software and culture: beyond internationalization of the interface, Journal of Global Information Management, InterNeg Report INR01/02.
  12. Law, N., Kankaanranta, M. & Chow, A. (2005). Technology-supported education innovations in Finland and Hong Kong: A tale of two systems. Human Technology, 1 (2) (pp. 176-201).
  13. Minkov, M. & Hofstede, G. (2011). The evolution of Hofstede’s doctrine. Cross cultural management: An International Journal 18 (1) (pp. 10-20).
  14. Munro-Smith, N. (2002). A Tale of Two Cities: computer mediated teaching and learning in Melbourne and Singapore. In Winds of change in the sea of learning: proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the ASCILITE: 8-11 December 2002.
  15. Mushtaha, A. & De Troyer, O. (2007). Cross-Cultural Understanding of Content and Interface in the Context of ELearning Systems, Usability and Internationalization, Part I, HCII 2007, LNCS 4559, (pp. 164-173).
  16. Nikolopoulou, K. (2007). Early Childhood Educational Software: Specific Features and Issues of Localization, Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(2), (pp 173-179).
  17. OECD (2013). Pisa 2012 Results in Focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know.
  18. Richter, T. & Pawlowski, J.M. (2007, October). The need for standardization of context metadata for e-Learning environments, Proceeding of e-ASEM Conference, Seoul, Korea.
  19. Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, B. & Quellmalz, E E. (2012). New assessment and environments for knowledge building. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht: Springer.
  20. Signorini, P., Wiesemes, R. & Murphy, R. (2009). Developing Alternative Frameworks for Exploring Intercultural Learning: a critique of Hofstede’s cultural difference model, Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), (pp. 253-264).

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Developing an evaluation framework for identifying globally shared and locally specific requirements for the design and use of educational technology

    Tiina Mäkelä, University of Jyväskylä, Finland

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (Mar 02, 2015) pp. 1220–1226

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact