You are here:

Evaluating the Nature Tour Mobile Learning Application PROCEEDINGS

, University of Jyväskylä, Finland

AACE Award

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Tampere, Finland ISBN 978-1-939797-08-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


This paper will focus and explain the evaluation process of the Nature Tour mobile application on a Finnish basic education setting. The idea of the mobile application is to help recording and comparing nature observations and arouse children's interest of nature. The feasibility and learning experiences were evaluated through a framework which includes the core characteristics of mobile learning. The data were collected with teacher and student surveys. The results of the study showed that the pedagogical practices have a strong influence on the mobile learning activity, mobile learning process, as well as mobile learning experience. The clear pedagogical goal made the mobile learning activity more organized and helped the teacher to guide the students to observe nature more goal oriented. The students were motivated, engaged and were concentrating on the task.


Rikala, J. (2014). Evaluating the Nature Tour Mobile Learning Application. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1675-1683). Tampere, Finland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 20, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Chen, W., Tan, N., Looi, C.-K., Zhang, B.H., and Seow, P. (2008). Handheld computers as cognitive tools: technology-enhanced environmental learning. In, Research and Practice in Technology Enabled Learning (pp. 231-252), vol. 3, no.3.
  2. Cheung, W.S., and Hew, K.F. (2009). A review of research methodologies used in studies on mobile handheld devices in K-12 and higher education settings. In, Australasian Journal o Educational Technology (pp. 153-183), 25(2).
  3. Finnish National Board of Education. (2008). Education in Finland. Retrieved from Finnish National Board of Education. (2011). The Curriculum. Retrieved from
  4. Finnish National Board of Education. (2012). Basic Education. Retrieved from Finnish National Board of Education. (2013). Oppimisympäristöhankkeet. Retrieved from
  5. Gillham, B. (2010). Case study research methods. London: Continuum International Publishing.
  6. Hwang, G.-J., Shi, Y.-R., and Chu, H.-C. (2011). A concept map approach to develop collaborative mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. In, British Journal of Educational Technology (pp. 778-789), vol. 42, no. 5.
  7. Huizemga, J., Hordijk, R., and Lubsen, A. (2008). The world as learning environment: playful and creative use of GPS and mobile technology in education.
  8. Kankaanranta, M., Neittaanmäki, P., and Nousiainen, T. (Eds) (2013). Arjen mobiilipalvelut-hankkeen oppimisen ja hyvinvoinnin ratkaisut. [Mobile solutions for learning and well-being]. Univeristy of Jyväskylä.
  9. Kankaanranta, M., Palonen, T., Kejonen, T., and Ärje, J. (2011). In, M. Kankaanranta (Ed.), Opetusteknologia koulun arjessa (pp. 47-76). Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto, Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos.
  10. Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K. And Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. In, Research in Learning Technology, 20.
  11. Koole, M.L. (2009). A Model for Framing Mobile Learning, In Mohamed, A. (ed.) Mobile Learning: Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training (pp. 25-50). Edmonton, AB, CAN: Athabasca Univeristy Press.
  12. Mercer, N. And Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: a sociocultural approach. London New York: Routledge.
  13. Osawa, N., Noda, K., Tsukagoshi, S., Noma, Y., Ando, A., Shinuya, T., and Kondo, K. (2007). Outdoor Education Support System with Location Awareness Using RFID and Symbology Tags. In, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia (pp. 411-428), vol. 16(4).
  14. Ozdamli, F. (2012). Pedagogical framework of m-learning. In, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, (pp. 927-931), volume
  15. 31.Parsons, D., Ryu, H., & Cranshaw, M. (2007). A Design Requirements Framework for Mobile Learning Environments. In, Journal of Computers, (pp. 1-8), vol 2, no 4.
  16. Priest, S. (1986). Redefinging Outdoor Education: A Matter of Many Relationships. In, Journal of Environmental Education, (pp. 13-15) vol 17 no 3.
  17. Rikala, J, & Kankaanranta, M. (2014). The Nature Tour Mobile Learning Application-Implementing the mobile application in Finnish early childhood settings. In, Proceedings of the 6th International Coference on Computer Supported Education, (pp. 171-178), vol 3.
  18. Silander, P. (2012). Mobiilioppimisen malleja ja menetelmiä. Retrieved from Shih, J.-L., Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., and Kinshuk. (2011). An investigation of attitudes of students and teachers about participating in a context-aware ubiquitous learning activity. In, British Journal of Educational Technology (pp. 373-394), vol.
  19. Tan, T.-H., Liu, T.-Y., and Chang, C.-C. (2007). Development and Evaluation of an RFID-based Ubiquitous Learning Environment for Outdoor Learning. In, Interactive Learning Environments (pp.253-269), vol. 15, no. 3.
  20. Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, Discussing and Evaluating Mobile Learning: the moving finger writes and having writ.... In, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 8, No 2. Retrieved from
  21. Traxler, J. (2009). Current State of Mobile Learning. In A. Mohamed (Ed.) Mobile Learning: Transforming the delivery of Education and Training (99. 9-24), Athabasca University Press, Edmonton, Canada.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact