A Comparison of Different Formats for Presenting Example Problems in Basic Engineering Web-Based Learning Modules
Richard Hall, Timothy Philpot, Ralph Flori, Vikas Yellamraju, Pradeepkumar Subramanian, University of Missouri - Rolla, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-48-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
The purpose of this experiment was to compare three different formats for presenting example problems within Basic Engineering Web-Based learning modules. After seeing a lecture over the shear flow concept on-line, students in a Basic Engineering Class viewed example problems covering this topic in either a video, static text/graphic, or animation format. Students then completed a number of outcome measures. High ability students scored higher on a quiz covering the materials and rated the materials as less motivating than their low ability peers. However, there were no significant objective or subjective outcome differences as a function of presentation format, nor did ability and experimental condition interact. A number of possible explanations for these findings are discussed.
Hall, R., Philpot, T., Flori, R., Yellamraju, V. & Subramanian, P. (2003). A Comparison of Different Formats for Presenting Example Problems in Basic Engineering Web-Based Learning Modules. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2003--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1011-1014). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 31, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/13933/.
© 2003 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
- Atkinson, R.K. (2002). Optimizing Learning from Examples Using Animated Pedagogical Agents. Journal of Educational Psychology 94 (2): 416-427.
- Dillon, A. (2002, October). Hypermedia and Instruction-Why Theory and Design Pass Another By! Paper presented at UMR Instructional Software Development Center Seminar Series, Rolla, MO.
- Dillon, A. And Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review o f Educational Research 68 : 322-349.
- Hall, R.H. (2001). Web-based training site design principles: A literature review and synthesis. In Web-based tra in ing. B. Khan (Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Educational Technology Publications: 165-172.
- Landauer, T. (1995). The Trouble with Computers. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
- Lanza, A. And Roselli, T. (1991). Effects of the hypertextual approach versus the structured approach on active and passive learners. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 18 : 48-50.
- Mayer, R.E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right q ues t ions? Educational Psychologist 32 : 119.
- Mayer, R.E., Heiser, J. And Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more materials results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 : 187-198.
- Moreno, R. And Mayer, R.E. (1999). Cognitive Principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology 91 : 358-368.
- Tergan, S. (1997). Conceptual and methodological shortcomings in hypertext design and research. Journal of Educational Computing Research 16 : 209-235.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References