You are here:

Simulation as a Framework for Preservice Assessment
PROCEEDINGS

, Vermont Institutes, United States ; , Western Oregon University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Atlanta, GA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-52-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The Vermont Institutes and Teaching Research, of Western Oregon University are partners in a preservice technology initiative that uniquely prepares teachers to improve student learning. The initiative documents growth in future teachers' results-oriented abilities by using a powerful new classroom and school simulation tool (SimSchool). This session will share how SimSchool and one of its partner projects “eTIPS” serve as examples of simulations and case-based e-learning platforms that provide a framework for assessing the knowledge and skills of preservice students.

Citation

Gibson, D. & Halverson, B. (2004). Simulation as a Framework for Preservice Assessment. In R. Ferdig, C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2004--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3322-3325). Atlanta, GA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Dexter, S. (2003). The Promise of Network-based Assessment for Supporting the Development of Teachers’ Technology Integration and Implementation Skills. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education 14th International Conference, New Orleans, SITE-AACE.
  2. Gibson, D. (2003). "Network-based assessment in education." Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 3 (3). Girod, G. And M. Schalock (2002). Does TWSM work? Connecting Teaching and Learning: A Handbook for Teacher Educators on Teacher Work Sample Methodology. G. Girod. Washington DC, American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.
  3. Millman, J., Ed. (1997). Grading teachers, grading schools. Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin. Riedel, E. And D. Gibson (2004). Learning through exploration of an online school: Characteristics of preservice teachers’ searches. Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education, Atlanta, GA, SITE.
  4. Stevens, A. (1999). Tracking, curriculum differentiation, and the student experience in english (high schools, language arts), State University Of New York at Albany: 1053.
  5. Stevens, R. (1991). "Search path mapping: A versatile approach for visualizing problem-solving behavior." Academic Medicine 66(9):S72-S75.
  6. Tomlinson, C.A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.