You are here:

Zen and the Art of Portfolio Maintenance: Best Practices in Course Design for Supporting Long-lasting Portfolios
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , Michigan State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Teacher education courses that use portfolios can impact the ways in which teachers develop as professionals. Although the affordances of portfolios impact the professional development process of both pre-service and in-service teachers, courses that limit technology use and portfolio scope restrict the effect of these affordances. In this paper, we identify and describe seven best practices for the design of portfolio courses: peer feedback, authentic audience and assessment, diverse resources, learning by doing, open access, confidential spaces, and self-pacing. Examples of each of these best practices in action will also be provided.

Citation

Greenhalgh, S.P., Rosenberg, J.M., Zellner, A. & Koehler, M.J. (2014). Zen and the Art of Portfolio Maintenance: Best Practices in Course Design for Supporting Long-lasting Portfolios. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1755-1761). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 15, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Beason, L. (1993). Feedback and Revision in Writing across the Curriculum Classes. Research in the Teaching of English, 27(4), 395–422.
  2. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 3242.
  3. Dewey, J. (2007). Experience and education. New York; Simon and Schuster.
  4. DiPardo, A., & Freedman, S.W. (1988). Peer Response Groups in the Writing Classroom: Theoretic Foundations and New Direc-tions. Review of Educational Research, 58(2), 119.
  5. Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience Addressed/Audience Invoked: The Role of Audience in Composition Theory and Ped-agogy. College Composition and Communication, 35, 155.
  6. Evans, M.A., & Powell, A. (2007). Conceptual and practical issues related to the design for and sustainability of communities of practice: The case of e-portfolio use in preservice teacher training. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 16, 199-214.
  7. Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 279–290.
  8. Love, D., McKean, G., & Gathercoal, P. (2004) Portfolios to webfolios and beyond: Levels of maturation. Educause Quarterly, 27(2), 24-38. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0423.pdf Magnifico, A.M. (2010). Writing for whom? Cognition, motivation, and a writer's audience. Educational Psychologist, 45, 167184.
  9. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108, 1017-1054.
  10. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2013). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment& Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 1–21. Doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
  11. Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York, NY.
  12. Pearce, N., Weller, M., Scanlon, E., & Ashleigh, M. (2012). Digital scholarship considered: How new technologies could transform academic work. In Education, 16(1), 33-44. Retrieved from http://ineducation.ca/ineducation/article/view/44/509 Pecheone, R.L., Pigg, M.J., Chung, R.R., & Souviney, R.J. (2005). Performance assessment and electronic portfolios: Their effect on teacher learning and education. The ClearingHouse, 78, 164-176.
  13. Reynolds, A. (2009). Why every student needs critical friends. Educational Leadership, 67(3), 54-57. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov09/vol67/num03/Why-Every-Student-Needs-CriticalFriends.aspx
  14. Russell, M., Kleiman, G., Carey, R., & Douglas, J. (2009). Comparing self-paced and cohort-based online courses for teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41, 443-466. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ844275.pdf Ryan, R., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11392867
  15. Shepard, A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
  16. Trent, J., & Shroff, R.H. (2013). Technology, identity, and community: The role of electronic teaching portfolios in becoming a teacher. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 22, 3-20. Doi:10.1080/1475939X.2012.720416
  17. Veletsianos, G. & Kimmons, R. (2012). Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 166-189. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1313/2343 Wolf, K. (1991). The schoolteacher's portfolio: Issues in design, implementation, and evaluation. The Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 129136.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.