You are here:

Blended Learning from the Perspective of Parents and Students PROCEEDINGS

, Grand Valley State University, United States ; , Sacred Heart University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This study examined the perceptions of parents and students enrolled in their first blended learning class. Online surveys at the end of the experience were administered. Both the students and parents were initially excited about the experience, but the parents had some reservations about their child’s ability to perform. Students admitted to falling behind in the course, but noted that the process served as a good learning experience for the future. Both parents and students complained about the lack of communication from the teachers of the course. Overall, the parents and students were grateful for the experience, and hoped that the course (which was a two-year course) would continue to be offered in a blended format in the future.

Citation

Siko, J. & Barbour, M. (2014). Blended Learning from the Perspective of Parents and Students. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1556-1560). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 20, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Black, E.W. (2009). An evaluation of familial involvements’ influence on student achievement in K–12 virtual schooling. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
  2. Chandra, V., & Fisher, D.L. (2009). Students’ perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 12(1), 31–44.
  3. Christensen, C., Johnson, W.B., & Horn, M. (2010). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  4. Geçer, A. (2013). Lecturer-student communication in blended learning environments. Educational Sciences: Theory& Practice, 13(1), 362–367. Hoover-Dempsey, K., V., & Sandler, H.M. (2005). Final performance report for OERI Grant #R305T010673: The social context of parental involvement: A path to enhanced achievement: Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  5. Hasler-Waters, L., & Leong, P. (2011). New Roles for the Teacher and Learning Coach in Blended Learning for K-12. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (Vol. 2011, No. 1, pp. 2716-2725).
  6. Parkes, S., Zaka, P., & Davis, N. (2011). The first blended or hybrid online course in a New Zealand secondary school: A case study. Computers in New Zealand Schools: Learning, Teaching, Technology, 23(1), 1-30.
  7. Pratt, K., & Trewern, A. (2011). New Zealand students’ perceptions of blended learning. In Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (Vol. 2011, pp. 663–668).
  8. Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning: Profiles of emerging models. San Mateo, CA: The Innosight Institute. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/publications/the-rise-of-k-12-blended-learning-profiles-ofemerging-models/
  9. Staker, H., & Horn, M.B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. San Mateo, CA: The Innosight Institute. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/?publications=classifying-k-12-blended-learning-2 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research, 273-285.
  10. Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2011). Keeping pace with K–12 online learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Evergreen, CO: Evergreen Education Group.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.