You are here:

Any Time, Any Place, Any Pace? Exploring Virtual Students Perceptions of Mobile Learning

, Sacred Heart University, United States ; , Wayne State University, United States ; , Southern Utah University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


Over the past decade, the number of K-12 students engaged in online learning has increased from 50,000 to more than two million. Students have also gained increased access to mobile devices throughout recent years, and educators have actively looked for ways to capitalize on this trend. A group of students enrolled in an advanced history course, offered by a statewide, supplemental virtual school in the Midwest were studied over the course of four weeks, an app that works on mobile devices, and offers an emulated version that runs on a computer. Findings in this small-scale exploratory study showed that despite the fact that existing literature indicated students’ perceptions were positive toward mobile technologies, these students’ perceptions were negative. While the isolated implementation of the project may have affected these perceptions, there is also indication that the success of the project, in terms of perception, may depend also on students’ access to mobile devices.


Barbour, M., Quinn Grzebyk, T. & Eye, J. (2014). Any Time, Any Place, Any Pace? Exploring Virtual Students Perceptions of Mobile Learning. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1515-1520). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Alobiedat, A. (2012). Faculty and student perception towards the appropriate and inappropriate use of mobile phones in the classroom at the University of Granada. International Journal of Instructional Media, 39(1), 7–16.
  2. Bradley, C., Haynes, R., Cook, J., Boyle, T., & Smith, C. (2009). In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 9-24). Edmonton: AU Press.
  3. Brown, L. (2008). Using mobile learning to teach reading to ninth-grade students (Ph.D.). Capella University, United States--Minnesota. Retrieved from 8C/13?accountid=14925
  4. Clark, T. (2001). Virtual schools: Trends and issues. A study of virtual schools in the United States. San Francisco, CA: Western Regional Educational Laboratories. Retrieved from Druin, A. (2009). Mobile technology for children: designing for interaction and learning. Burlington: Elsevier Science.
  5. Huang, J.-H., Lin, Y.-R., & Chuang, S.T. (2007). Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: A perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. The Electronic Library, 25(5), 585–598.
  6. Kiboss, J.K. (2012). Effects of special e-learning program on hearing-impaired learners’ achievement and perceptions of basic geometry in lower primary mathematics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 31–59.
  7. Lenhart, A. (2012). Teens, smartphones& Texting. In Washington, DC, Pew Internet& American Life Project. Retrieved from Looi, C.K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). 1:1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: a study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 269–287. Doi:10.1111/J.1365-2729.2010.00390.x
  8. Messinger, J. (2011). M-learning: An exploration of the attitudes and perceptions of high school students versus teachers regarding the current and future use of mobile devices for learning (Ed.D.). Pepperdine University, United States-California. Retrieved from 8C/11?accountid=14925
  9. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A source book for new methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  10. Nelson, L.L. (2012). The student voice: A study of learning experiences enriched by mobile technologies (Ed.D.). Western Illinois University, United States--Illinois. Retrieved from A8C/67?accountid=14925
  11. Pachler, N. (2010). Mobile learning. Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from Url=
  12. Pollara, P., & Broussard, K.K. (2011). Student perceptions of mobile learning: a review of current research. In Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (Vol. 2011, pp. 1643–1650). Retrieved from Rau, P.L.P., Gao, Q., & Wu, L.M. (2008). Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers& Education, 50(1), 1–22.
  13. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  14. Ting, Y.L. (2012). The pitfalls of mobile devices in learning: a different view and implications for pedagogical design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2), 119–134. Doi:10.2190/EC.46.2.a
  15. Traxler, J. (2009). Current state of mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 9-24). Edmonton: AU Press.
  16. Wang, S., & Heffernan, N. (2010). Ethical issues in computer-assisted language learning: perceptions of teachers and learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 796–813.
  17. Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2012). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning: An annual review of state-level policy and practice. Evergreen, CO: Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved from
  18. Yang, S. (2012). Exploring college students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of mobile learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 148–154.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact