You are here:

Social Interaction and Peer Mentorship at Universities in a Post-Course Future
PROCEEDINGS

, University of North Texas / University of Texas at Arlington, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

While the predictions of the death of the University are premature and mostly unfounded, one of the foundational units of learning at universities – the course – may be changing. As learning becomes more student-centered, multimedia and interaction are being leveraged in deconstructed open courses to form peer mentorship networks, also known as personal learning networks. This paper will examine how these networks could be an important foundational step in moving towards a thriving student-centered, post-course future at universities. Emerging college systems that leverage personal learning networks based on interaction and multimedia will be examined.

Citation

Crosslin, M. (2014). Social Interaction and Peer Mentorship at Universities in a Post-Course Future. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 286-289). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 16, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Boyle Single, P.B. (2010). Demystifying dissertation writing. Sterling, VI: Stylus Publishing.
  2. Columbaro, N.L. (2009). E-mentoring possibilities for online doctoral students: A literature review. Adult Learning. 20(3-4), 9-15.
  3. Crosslin, M., Wakefield, J., Bennette, P., & Black, W. (2013, October 23). Leveraging sociocultural theory to create a mentorship program for new doctoral students. Paper presented at the IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age CELDA 2013. Fort Worth, TX.
  4. Dearnley, C. (2003). Student support in open learning: Sustaining the process. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1).
  5. Downes, S. (2007). An introduction to connective knowledge. In H. Theo (Ed.) Media, knowledge& Education-exploring new spaces, relations and dynamics in digital media ecologies. Proceedings of the international conference, Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press.
  6. Evans, M. (2004). Killing thinking: The death of the universities. New York: Continuum Books.
  7. Groom, J. (2012, May 21). DS106: The spring 2012 course evaluations [Weblog]. Retrieved from http://bavatuesdays.com/ds106-the-spring-2012-course-evaluations/ Kwan, B.S.C. (2009). Reading in preparation for writing a PhD thesis: Case studies of experiences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 180-191.
  8. Mackness, J., Mak, S., & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In Networked Learing Conference (pp. 266-275). University of Lancaster.
  9. Mann, H. (1999). Vygotsky’s methodological contribution to sociocultural theory. Remedial and Special Education, 20(6), 341-350.
  10. Martindale, T., & Dowdy, M. (2010). Personal Learning Environments. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 177–193). Edmonton, Alberta: Athabasca University Press.
  11. Mullen, C.A., Fish, V.L., & Hutinger, J.L. (2010). Mentoring doctoral students through scholastic engagement: Adult learning principles in action. Journal of Future and Higher Education, 34(2), 179-197.
  12. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.