You are here:

Hub or Silo? Expanding the LMS with Innovative Web Tools
PROCEEDINGS

, Texas Christian University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The typical use of Learning Management System (LMS) technology in the college classroom includes posting grades, administering assessments, and facilitating asynchronous discussions. When used this way, the LMS serves as a silo with all course-related resources locked up and available only to students in the course while they are enrolled. While the current generation of college students will use these features of the LMS to the extent they help them accomplish course goals, this use of technology is disconnected from students’ personal technology use outside of class. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the use of LMS as a hub, where instructors leverage those social tools familiar to the students by seamlessly embedding them into the LMS. This provides students with ubiquitous access to course materials both inside and outside the LMS environment, and allows them to blend these resources into their existing digital networks.

Citation

Alexander, C. (2014). Hub or Silo? Expanding the LMS with Innovative Web Tools. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 209-213). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 16, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Alias, N.A., & Zainuddin, A.M. (2005). Innovation for better teaching and learning: adopting the learning management system. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(2), 27-40.
  2. Ansorge, C.J., & Bendus, O. (2003). The pedagogical impact of course management systems on faculty, students, and institution. In R. Bruning, C.A. Horn, & L.M. PytlikZillig (Eds.), Web-based learning: What do we know (169-190). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
  3. Bowen, J.A. (2012). Teaching naked: How moving technology out of your college classroom will improve student learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education& Management, 11(1), 19-36.
  5. Cox, T.C., & Williams, A. (2011). Virtual office hours. In K.P. King& T.D. Cox (Eds.), The professor’s guide to taming technology: Leveraging digital media, Web 2.0, and more for learning (135-150). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
  6. Elgort, I. (2005, December). E-learning adoption: Bridging the chasm. In Proceedings of ASCILITE (pp. 181-185).
  7. Hiltz, S.R., & Turoff, M. (2005). Education goes digital: The evolution of online learning and the revolution in higher education. Communications of the ACM,48(10), 59-64.
  8. Kolowich, S. (2012). Getting their money’s worth. Inside Higher Ed., March. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/03/21/traditional-colleges-aim-boost-lms-usage. Li, L., & Pitts, J.P. (2009). Does It Really Matter? Using Virtual Office Hours to Enhance Student-Faculty Interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 175-185.
  9. Parker, K., Lenhart, A., & Moore, K. (2011). The digital revolution and higher education. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/PIPOnline-Learning.pdf.
  10. Pempek, T.A., Yermolayeva, Y.A., & Calvert, S.L. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227-238.
  11. Rovai, A.P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 77-88.
  12. Smith, A., Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2011). College students and technology. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/College-students-andtechnology/Report.aspx
  13. Thomas, H. (2010). Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis’placement of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 502-511.
  14. Watson, G. & Sottile, J. (2010). Cheating in the Digital Age: Do Students Cheat More in Online Courses?. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(1),. Retrieved October 16, 2013 from http://www.editlib.org/p/76542. Willging, P.A., & Johnson, S.D. (2004). Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4), 105-118.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.