You are here:

Resource Discovery: Heavy and Light Metadata Approaches PROCEEDINGS

, The Open University, United Kingdom

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Lugano, Switzerland ISBN 978-1-880094-53-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

This paper characterises two approaches to the use of metadata for resource discovery. The first, the Heavy approach, emphasises the quality of the metadata. The second, the Light approach, emphasises obtaining the largest number of resources, using software techniques to compensate for the reduced metadata quality. The approaches are illustrated with a series of case studies: library catalogues, the web, and educational resources. In designing a system, the choice of approach will depend on the particular requirements. Light metadata approaches scale better as the number of resources in the system increases.

Citation

Clow, D. (2004). Resource Discovery: Heavy and Light Metadata Approaches. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2004--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 469-475). Lugano, Switzerland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 15, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Amazon (2003). Available online at http://www.amazon.com.Visite D 18 December 2003.
  2. Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards (CETIS) (2001). CETIS Reference: Metadata. Available online at http://www.cetis.ac.uk/encyclopedia/entries/20010905154527 . Visited 18 December 2003.
  3. Craven, P. (2003). Google's PageRank Explained: And how to make the most of i t . Available online at http://www.webworkshop.net/pagerank.html. Visited 18 December 2003.
  4. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2003). Available online at http://dublincore.org.Visite D 18 December 2003. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) (N.D.). ERIC Thesaurus. Available online at http://www.ericfacility.net/extra/pub/thessearch.cfm. Visited 18 December 2003.
  5. Gilliland-Swetland, A. J. (2000). Introduction to metadata: Setting the Stage. Available online at http://www.getty.edu/research/conductin G_research/standards/intrometadata/2_articles/index.html . Visited 18 December 2003.
  6. Graham, G. (2003). UK Learning Object Metadata Core. Draft 0.1, July 2003. Available online at http://www.cetis.ac.uk/profiles/uklomcore/uklomcore_v0p1.doc. Visited 18 December 2003.
  7. IMS Global Learning Consortium. (2003). Available online at http://www.imsglobal.org.Visite D 18 December 2003. Knowledge Network (2003). Available online at http://kn.open.ac.uk/public/. Visited 18 December 2003. Kuhn, M. (2001). A Summary of the International Standard Date and Time Notation. Available online at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html . Visited 18 December 2003.
  8. Library of Congress. (2003). Library of Congress Frequently Asked Questions: Cataloging at the Library of Congress. Available online at http://www.loc.gov/faq/catfaq.html . Visited 18 December 2003.
  9. MASIE Center. (2003). Making Sense of Learning Specifications and Standards: A Decision Maker's Guide to their adoption . 2n d Edn. Available online at http://www.masie.com/standards/s3_2nd_edition.pdf. Visited 18 December 2003. Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming more components on to digital circuits. Electronics, 38(8). Available online at ftp://download.intel.com/research/silicon/moorespaper.pdf. Visited 18 December 2003.
  10. Open Directory Project (2003). Available online at http://dmoz.org.Visite D 18 December 2003.
  11. RDN (2003). Resource Discovery Network. Available online at http://www.rdn.ac.uk.Visite D 18 December 2003.
  12. RESL (2003). Reusable Educational Software Library. Available online at http://www.resl.ac.uk.Visite D 18 December 2003.
  13. Rogers , I. (2002). The Google Pagerank Algorithm and How It Works. Available online at http://iprcom.com/papers/pagerank/index.html . Visited 18 December 2003.
  14. Russell, R. (2003). Metadata standards fo r the description of portal users: a review. PORTAL Workpackage 6. Available online at http://www.fair -portal.hull.ac.uk/downloads/Metadata.pdf. Visited 18 December 2003.
  15. Schwartz, C. (2001). Sorting out the web: Approaches to subject access. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing. Slater, J. (2002). A guide to metadata . Available online at http://metadata.cetis.ac.uk/guides/guide.doc. Visited 18 December 2003.
  16. Snijder, R. (2001). Metadata Standards and Information Analysis: A Survey of Current Metadata Standards and the Underlying Models. Available online at http://www.geocities.com/ronaldsnijder. Visited 18 December 2003. Sullivan, D. (2003). ComScore Media Metrix Search Engine Ratings. Available online at http://searchenginewatch.com/reports/article.php/2156431 . Visited 18 December 2003.
  17. W3C (2001). W3C Semantic Web. Available online at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/. Visited 18 December 2003. W3C (2003). Resource Description Framework (RDF) . Available online at http://www.w3.org/RDF . Visited 18 December 2003.
  18. Wikipedia (2003). Moore's Law. Available online at http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law. Visited 18 December 2003.
  19. Zawodny, J. (2003). PageRank is Dead . Available online at http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/000751.html. Visited 18 December 2003.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.